Juliana Chueri
Biographic Data
| ID | 4015501 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Juliana Chueri |
| GIVEN NAMES | Juliana |
| FAMILY NAME | Chueri |
| SIGNATURE | CHUERI J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-7629-6731 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 17 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 97 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 17 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 5 |
Who deserves protection? Deservingness, intergroup contact, and public support for gig workers’ rights
The rapid expansion of platform-mediated gig work has intensified debates over whether gig workers should receive social and employment rights comparable to those of standard employees. Yet, despite its high political salience, we know little about how citizens evaluate gig workers’ entitlement to such protections. Gig work, especially in ride hailing and food delivery, is often precarious, with a lack of control at work, weaker contribution reco…
AI, the Future of Work, and the Politics of the Welfare State
Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) pose a profound challenge to the world of work. While the precise consequences remain uncertain, there is growing consensus that we are entering an era marked by widespread labor market insecurities. Existing welfare states are ill-equipped to manage such disruptions: most social benefits remain grounded in work-based eligibility and emphasize rapid reintegration into the labor market. Meanwhile, train…
Populist right-wing voting: The (conditional) role of implicit bias
When Do Parties Lie? Misinformation and Radical-Right Populism Across 26 Countries
The spread of misinformation has emerged as a global concern. Academic attention has recently shifted to emphasize the role of political elites as drivers of misinformation. Yet, little is known of the relationship between party politics and the spread of misinformation—in part due to a dearth of cross-national empirical data needed for comparative study. This article examines which parties are more likely to spread misinformation, by drawing on …
How welfare states influence online platform work in Europe
Digital labor platforms are reshaping global labor markets by enabling the transnational contracting of service workers. While the dominant perspective emphasizes market forces, predicting that lower-wage countries will dominate the supply side, this view overlooks the institutional context in which platform labor emerges. This paper advances the argument that national welfare institutions are key to shaping participation in the platform economy.…
Re-evaluating the welfare preferences of radical-right voters: Evidence From a Vignette Experiment
Research on the welfare stances of populist radical-right parties (PRRPs) categorises them as ‘welfare chauvinists’ and ‘producerists’, supporting generous benefits exclusively for ‘hard-working’ nationals. However, it remains unclear whether their voters’ welfare preferences align with these positions. The argument advanced in this paper is that a comprehensive understanding of PRRP voters’ welfare preferences requires the examination of how so…
What Drives Opposition to Social Rights for Immigrants? Clarifying the Role of Psychological Predispositions
Why do people oppose granting social rights to immigrants? Previous research indicates that psychological predispositions such as authoritarianism or ethnocentrism are strong drivers, but our understanding of their roles is still incomplete. This is in part because studies have not yet systematically tested different psychological variables against other, but also in part because some other potentially important predispositions such as implicit b…
Welfare Chauvinism among Voters and Political Parties: Exploring Preferences for Restricting EU Migrants' Access to Social Assistance in Switzerland
The access of EU migrants to social assistance is highly politicised in Switzerland. However, we know little about parties' and voters' positions on this issue across the ideological spectrum. Using quantitative methods, this article examines whether there is congruence between voters' preferences on EU migrants' access to social assistance and those of political parties. It also examines whether citizens' voting choices are influenced by the deg…
Who deserves student finance? Results from a survey experiment in six advanced capitalist economies
Did Russia’s invasion of Ukraine unite Europe? Cohesion and divisions of the European Parliament on Twitter
The EU has been on track toward growing disunity along geographical and political lines, expressed in growing anti-EU sentiments and the rise of Euroskeptic forces.However, Russia's invasion of Ukraine seems to have functioned as a source of unity -revitalizing the European project by creating alliances in response to an external threat.However, as the war drags on, it begs the question of how brittle its new-found unity may be.This study thus se…
Political groups over national parties: Measuring the Europeanization of the political arena through MEPs’ Twitter interactions
The question of the democratic character of the European Union (EU) has been a center-point of decades of political research. An important critique suggests that the development of the European political arena is still incomplete, with European parliamentarians primarily orienting themselves to national issues and politicians, implying a problematic mismatch between the political arena and their policy jurisdiction. Research has however been limi…
Welfare solidarity in multi-ethnic societies: Can Social Investment Reduce the Anti-Immigrant Bias
Migration flows have diversified western societies, challenging the political viability of inclusive welfare states. This is very clear in research on perceptions of deservingness to social benefits, which consistently shows that immigrants are considered as less deserving of collective help than natives. At the same time, welfare states are being reoriented towards social investment, putting more emphasis on services that strengthen human capita…
It’s Conditional: Improving the Measurement of Populism
This article seeks to advance the literature by improving the measurement of populism in content analyses. Following the conceptualization of the ideational approach, we argue that populist key elements (such as people-centrism and anti-elitism) need to co-occur for a political actor to be considered a populist. Strikingly enough, this conditional requirement only plays a marginal role in empirical analyses thus far. When it comes to the aggregat…
Closing the gap: How Descriptive and Substantive Representation Affect Women’s Vote for Populist Radical Right Parties
Although populist radical right-wing parties (PRRPs) are regarded as male-dominated, many have in recent years expanded their female electorate and reduced their electoral gender gap. Studies explain this trend as the result of a conscious strategy to target female voters through representation. This strategy is applied in both the descriptive and substantial realms, as PRRPs appoint female leaders and adopt relatively more progressive stances on…
What distinguishes radical right welfare chauvinism? Excluding different migrant groups from the welfare state
Literature posits that mainstream right-wing parties have adopted restrictive positions on immigrants’ entitlements to social rights to avoid losing votes to populist radical right-wing parties (PRRPs). Although studies recognize that this co-option is only partial, we know little about the remaining differences between PRRPs’ and mainstream right-wing parties’ welfare chauvinism strategies. This article fills this knowledge gap by comparing how …
An emerging populist welfare paradigm? How populist radical right‐wing parties are reshaping the welfare state
Populist radical right‐wing parties (PRRPs) in Western Europe have almost without exception shifted their position on distributive issues, abandoning their earlier support for a minimal welfare state in favor of higher social spending. Recent studies suggest that PRRPs' distributive preferences go beyond the clash between simply expanding or retrenching welfare; instead, they defend a specific welfare state that focuses on consumption policies fo…
Social policy outcomes of government participation by radical right parties
The literature has pointed to a change in radical right-wing parties’ (RRWPs) position regarding the welfare state. Those parties have abandoned the neoliberal approach on distributive issues and have become defenders of social expenditure for deserving groups. Nevertheless, as RRWPs have joined with right-wing mainstream parties to form governments, their distributive policy position might cause conflict in a coalition. This study, therefore, ad…
Social policy outcomes of government participation by radical right parties
The literature has pointed to a change in radical right-wing parties’ (RRWPs) position regarding the welfare state. Those parties have abandoned the neoliberal approach on distributive issues and have become defenders of social expenditure for deserving groups. Nevertheless, as RRWPs have joined with right-wing mainstream parties to form governments, their distributive policy position might cause conflict in a coalition. This study, therefore, ad…
An emerging populist welfare paradigm? How populist radical right‐wing parties are reshaping the welfare state
Populist radical right‐wing parties (PRRPs) in Western Europe have almost without exception shifted their position on distributive issues, abandoning their earlier support for a minimal welfare state in favor of higher social spending. Recent studies suggest that PRRPs' distributive preferences go beyond the clash between simply expanding or retrenching welfare; instead, they defend a specific welfare state that focuses on consumption policies fo…
Closing the gap: How Descriptive and Substantive Representation Affect Women’s Vote for Populist Radical Right Parties
Although populist radical right-wing parties (PRRPs) are regarded as male-dominated, many have in recent years expanded their female electorate and reduced their electoral gender gap. Studies explain this trend as the result of a conscious strategy to target female voters through representation. This strategy is applied in both the descriptive and substantial realms, as PRRPs appoint female leaders and adopt relatively more progressive stances on…
When Do Parties Lie? Misinformation and Radical-Right Populism Across 26 Countries
The spread of misinformation has emerged as a global concern. Academic attention has recently shifted to emphasize the role of political elites as drivers of misinformation. Yet, little is known of the relationship between party politics and the spread of misinformation—in part due to a dearth of cross-national empirical data needed for comparative study. This article examines which parties are more likely to spread misinformation, by drawing on …
What distinguishes radical right welfare chauvinism? Excluding different migrant groups from the welfare state
Literature posits that mainstream right-wing parties have adopted restrictive positions on immigrants’ entitlements to social rights to avoid losing votes to populist radical right-wing parties (PRRPs). Although studies recognize that this co-option is only partial, we know little about the remaining differences between PRRPs’ and mainstream right-wing parties’ welfare chauvinism strategies. This article fills this knowledge gap by comparing how …
Re-evaluating the welfare preferences of radical-right voters: Evidence From a Vignette Experiment
Research on the welfare stances of populist radical-right parties (PRRPs) categorises them as ‘welfare chauvinists’ and ‘producerists’, supporting generous benefits exclusively for ‘hard-working’ nationals. However, it remains unclear whether their voters’ welfare preferences align with these positions. The argument advanced in this paper is that a comprehensive understanding of PRRP voters’ welfare preferences requires the examination of how so…
Welfare solidarity in multi-ethnic societies: Can Social Investment Reduce the Anti-Immigrant Bias
Migration flows have diversified western societies, challenging the political viability of inclusive welfare states. This is very clear in research on perceptions of deservingness to social benefits, which consistently shows that immigrants are considered as less deserving of collective help than natives. At the same time, welfare states are being reoriented towards social investment, putting more emphasis on services that strengthen human capita…
Did Russia’s invasion of Ukraine unite Europe? Cohesion and divisions of the European Parliament on Twitter
The EU has been on track toward growing disunity along geographical and political lines, expressed in growing anti-EU sentiments and the rise of Euroskeptic forces.However, Russia's invasion of Ukraine seems to have functioned as a source of unity -revitalizing the European project by creating alliances in response to an external threat.However, as the war drags on, it begs the question of how brittle its new-found unity may be.This study thus se…
What Drives Opposition to Social Rights for Immigrants? Clarifying the Role of Psychological Predispositions
Why do people oppose granting social rights to immigrants? Previous research indicates that psychological predispositions such as authoritarianism or ethnocentrism are strong drivers, but our understanding of their roles is still incomplete. This is in part because studies have not yet systematically tested different psychological variables against other, but also in part because some other potentially important predispositions such as implicit b…
Welfare Chauvinism among Voters and Political Parties: Exploring Preferences for Restricting EU Migrants' Access to Social Assistance in Switzerland
The access of EU migrants to social assistance is highly politicised in Switzerland. However, we know little about parties' and voters' positions on this issue across the ideological spectrum. Using quantitative methods, this article examines whether there is congruence between voters' preferences on EU migrants' access to social assistance and those of political parties. It also examines whether citizens' voting choices are influenced by the deg…
Political groups over national parties: Measuring the Europeanization of the political arena through MEPs’ Twitter interactions
The question of the democratic character of the European Union (EU) has been a center-point of decades of political research. An important critique suggests that the development of the European political arena is still incomplete, with European parliamentarians primarily orienting themselves to national issues and politicians, implying a problematic mismatch between the political arena and their policy jurisdiction. Research has however been limi…
It’s Conditional: Improving the Measurement of Populism
This article seeks to advance the literature by improving the measurement of populism in content analyses. Following the conceptualization of the ideational approach, we argue that populist key elements (such as people-centrism and anti-elitism) need to co-occur for a political actor to be considered a populist. Strikingly enough, this conditional requirement only plays a marginal role in empirical analyses thus far. When it comes to the aggregat…
Social policy outcomes of government participation by radical right parties
The literature has pointed to a change in radical right-wing parties’ (RRWPs) position regarding the welfare state. Those parties have abandoned the neoliberal approach on distributive issues and have become defenders of social expenditure for deserving groups. Nevertheless, as RRWPs have joined with right-wing mainstream parties to form governments, their distributive policy position might cause conflict in a coalition. This study, therefore, ad…
What distinguishes radical right welfare chauvinism? Excluding different migrant groups from the welfare state
Literature posits that mainstream right-wing parties have adopted restrictive positions on immigrants’ entitlements to social rights to avoid losing votes to populist radical right-wing parties (PRRPs). Although studies recognize that this co-option is only partial, we know little about the remaining differences between PRRPs’ and mainstream right-wing parties’ welfare chauvinism strategies. This article fills this knowledge gap by comparing how …
An emerging populist welfare paradigm? How populist radical right‐wing parties are reshaping the welfare state
Populist radical right‐wing parties (PRRPs) in Western Europe have almost without exception shifted their position on distributive issues, abandoning their earlier support for a minimal welfare state in favor of higher social spending. Recent studies suggest that PRRPs' distributive preferences go beyond the clash between simply expanding or retrenching welfare; instead, they defend a specific welfare state that focuses on consumption policies fo…
Closing the gap: How Descriptive and Substantive Representation Affect Women’s Vote for Populist Radical Right Parties
Although populist radical right-wing parties (PRRPs) are regarded as male-dominated, many have in recent years expanded their female electorate and reduced their electoral gender gap. Studies explain this trend as the result of a conscious strategy to target female voters through representation. This strategy is applied in both the descriptive and substantial realms, as PRRPs appoint female leaders and adopt relatively more progressive stances on…
Did Russia’s invasion of Ukraine unite Europe? Cohesion and divisions of the European Parliament on Twitter
The EU has been on track toward growing disunity along geographical and political lines, expressed in growing anti-EU sentiments and the rise of Euroskeptic forces.However, Russia's invasion of Ukraine seems to have functioned as a source of unity -revitalizing the European project by creating alliances in response to an external threat.However, as the war drags on, it begs the question of how brittle its new-found unity may be.This study thus se…
Political groups over national parties: Measuring the Europeanization of the political arena through MEPs’ Twitter interactions
The question of the democratic character of the European Union (EU) has been a center-point of decades of political research. An important critique suggests that the development of the European political arena is still incomplete, with European parliamentarians primarily orienting themselves to national issues and politicians, implying a problematic mismatch between the political arena and their policy jurisdiction. Research has however been limi…
Welfare solidarity in multi-ethnic societies: Can Social Investment Reduce the Anti-Immigrant Bias
Migration flows have diversified western societies, challenging the political viability of inclusive welfare states. This is very clear in research on perceptions of deservingness to social benefits, which consistently shows that immigrants are considered as less deserving of collective help than natives. At the same time, welfare states are being reoriented towards social investment, putting more emphasis on services that strengthen human capita…
It’s Conditional: Improving the Measurement of Populism
This article seeks to advance the literature by improving the measurement of populism in content analyses. Following the conceptualization of the ideational approach, we argue that populist key elements (such as people-centrism and anti-elitism) need to co-occur for a political actor to be considered a populist. Strikingly enough, this conditional requirement only plays a marginal role in empirical analyses thus far. When it comes to the aggregat…
How welfare states influence online platform work in Europe
Digital labor platforms are reshaping global labor markets by enabling the transnational contracting of service workers. While the dominant perspective emphasizes market forces, predicting that lower-wage countries will dominate the supply side, this view overlooks the institutional context in which platform labor emerges. This paper advances the argument that national welfare institutions are key to shaping participation in the platform economy.…
Re-evaluating the welfare preferences of radical-right voters: Evidence From a Vignette Experiment
Research on the welfare stances of populist radical-right parties (PRRPs) categorises them as ‘welfare chauvinists’ and ‘producerists’, supporting generous benefits exclusively for ‘hard-working’ nationals. However, it remains unclear whether their voters’ welfare preferences align with these positions. The argument advanced in this paper is that a comprehensive understanding of PRRP voters’ welfare preferences requires the examination of how so…
What Drives Opposition to Social Rights for Immigrants? Clarifying the Role of Psychological Predispositions
Why do people oppose granting social rights to immigrants? Previous research indicates that psychological predispositions such as authoritarianism or ethnocentrism are strong drivers, but our understanding of their roles is still incomplete. This is in part because studies have not yet systematically tested different psychological variables against other, but also in part because some other potentially important predispositions such as implicit b…
Welfare Chauvinism among Voters and Political Parties: Exploring Preferences for Restricting EU Migrants' Access to Social Assistance in Switzerland
The access of EU migrants to social assistance is highly politicised in Switzerland. However, we know little about parties' and voters' positions on this issue across the ideological spectrum. Using quantitative methods, this article examines whether there is congruence between voters' preferences on EU migrants' access to social assistance and those of political parties. It also examines whether citizens' voting choices are influenced by the deg…
Who deserves student finance? Results from a survey experiment in six advanced capitalist economies
Who deserves protection? Deservingness, intergroup contact, and public support for gig workers’ rights
The rapid expansion of platform-mediated gig work has intensified debates over whether gig workers should receive social and employment rights comparable to those of standard employees. Yet, despite its high political salience, we know little about how citizens evaluate gig workers’ entitlement to such protections. Gig work, especially in ride hailing and food delivery, is often precarious, with a lack of control at work, weaker contribution reco…
AI, the Future of Work, and the Politics of the Welfare State
Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) pose a profound challenge to the world of work. While the precise consequences remain uncertain, there is growing consensus that we are entering an era marked by widespread labor market insecurities. Existing welfare states are ill-equipped to manage such disruptions: most social benefits remain grounded in work-based eligibility and emphasize rapid reintegration into the labor market. Meanwhile, train…
Populist right-wing voting: The (conditional) role of implicit bias
When Do Parties Lie? Misinformation and Radical-Right Populism Across 26 Countries
The spread of misinformation has emerged as a global concern. Academic attention has recently shifted to emphasize the role of political elites as drivers of misinformation. Yet, little is known of the relationship between party politics and the spread of misinformation—in part due to a dearth of cross-national empirical data needed for comparative study. This article examines which parties are more likely to spread misinformation, by drawing on …
Politics (14 works) · Political science (13 works) · Law (12 works) · Law (12 works) · Economics (10 works) · Sociology (10 works) · Welfare (9 works) · Political economy (8 works) · Populism, Right-Wing Movements (8 works) · Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 works)