Larry R Kimball
Biographic Data
| ID | 4053451 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Larry R Kimball |
| GIVEN NAMES | Larry R |
| FAMILY NAME | Kimball |
| SIGNATURE | KIMBALL L R |
| AFFILIATIONS | Appalachian State University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-3331-2305 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 46 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1989 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
A Multi-instrument Study of Microwear Polishes on Mousterian Tools from Weasel Cave ( Myshtulagty Lagat ), Russia
The functions of flaked stone tools are usually determined by the observation of microwear polishes with the incident-light microscope with magnifications of 50–400× – known as the Keeley Method. In our study into the function of Mousterian flint tools from Weasel Cave, we employ the atomic force microscope (AFM) and the optical interferometer, in addition to the light microscope and the SEM. The advantage of the AFM and the interferometer are th…
Early Hunter-Gatherer Tool Use and Animal Exploitation
Results of protein residue and lithic microwear analyses are reported for Paleoindian and Early Archaic stone tools from a Carolina bay sand rim on the Aiken Plateau of South Carolina, USA. Protein residue analysis is performed using crossover Immunoelectrophoresis (CIEP), and indicates positive results for Bovidae, Cervidae, Galliformes, and Meleagris gallopavo. These results are complemented by a larger immunological study of 135 diagnostic haf…
The Biltmore Mound and Hopewellian Mound Use in the Southern Appalachians
Biltmore Mound, located on the Swannanoa River in Asheville, North Carolina, was constructed over a Connestee phase habitation, the earliest evidence dating to about A.D. 300. Mound construction began sometime between A.D. 400 and 550, with the second to last mound stage constructed about A.D. 580–600. Because of the diverse contexts and the excellent preservation of faunal remains, we are able to provide some insights into Connestee ritualism at…
An Introduction to Methodological and Substantive Contributions of Microwear Analysis
"An Introduction to Methodological and Substantive Contributions of Microwear Analysis." Lithic Technology, 19(2), pp. 81–82
Microwear Analysis in the Maya Lowlands
Microwear, or use-wear, analysis has been infrequently applied to the lithic assemblages of complex societies, and even in those instances the results often have been of limited utility. Perhaps the main reason for this is a lack of a theoretical context into which the largely empirical data of microwear analysis can be integrated. This paper describes the results of a microwear analysis of Late Classic Period lithic materials from the central Pe…
Microwear Analysis in the Maya Lowlands
Microwear, or use-wear, analysis has been infrequently applied to the lithic assemblages of complex societies, and even in those instances the results often have been of limited utility. Perhaps the main reason for this is a lack of a theoretical context into which the largely empirical data of microwear analysis can be integrated. This paper describes the results of a microwear analysis of Late Classic Period lithic materials from the central Pe…
The Biltmore Mound and Hopewellian Mound Use in the Southern Appalachians
Biltmore Mound, located on the Swannanoa River in Asheville, North Carolina, was constructed over a Connestee phase habitation, the earliest evidence dating to about A.D. 300. Mound construction began sometime between A.D. 400 and 550, with the second to last mound stage constructed about A.D. 580–600. Because of the diverse contexts and the excellent preservation of faunal remains, we are able to provide some insights into Connestee ritualism at…
A Multi-instrument Study of Microwear Polishes on Mousterian Tools from Weasel Cave ( Myshtulagty Lagat ), Russia
The functions of flaked stone tools are usually determined by the observation of microwear polishes with the incident-light microscope with magnifications of 50–400× – known as the Keeley Method. In our study into the function of Mousterian flint tools from Weasel Cave, we employ the atomic force microscope (AFM) and the optical interferometer, in addition to the light microscope and the SEM. The advantage of the AFM and the interferometer are th…
Early Hunter-Gatherer Tool Use and Animal Exploitation
Results of protein residue and lithic microwear analyses are reported for Paleoindian and Early Archaic stone tools from a Carolina bay sand rim on the Aiken Plateau of South Carolina, USA. Protein residue analysis is performed using crossover Immunoelectrophoresis (CIEP), and indicates positive results for Bovidae, Cervidae, Galliformes, and Meleagris gallopavo. These results are complemented by a larger immunological study of 135 diagnostic haf…
An Introduction to Methodological and Substantive Contributions of Microwear Analysis
"An Introduction to Methodological and Substantive Contributions of Microwear Analysis." Lithic Technology, 19(2), pp. 81–82
Microwear Analysis in the Maya Lowlands
Microwear, or use-wear, analysis has been infrequently applied to the lithic assemblages of complex societies, and even in those instances the results often have been of limited utility. Perhaps the main reason for this is a lack of a theoretical context into which the largely empirical data of microwear analysis can be integrated. This paper describes the results of a microwear analysis of Late Classic Period lithic materials from the central Pe…
An Introduction to Methodological and Substantive Contributions of Microwear Analysis
"An Introduction to Methodological and Substantive Contributions of Microwear Analysis." Lithic Technology, 19(2), pp. 81–82
The Biltmore Mound and Hopewellian Mound Use in the Southern Appalachians
Biltmore Mound, located on the Swannanoa River in Asheville, North Carolina, was constructed over a Connestee phase habitation, the earliest evidence dating to about A.D. 300. Mound construction began sometime between A.D. 400 and 550, with the second to last mound stage constructed about A.D. 580–600. Because of the diverse contexts and the excellent preservation of faunal remains, we are able to provide some insights into Connestee ritualism at…
Early Hunter-Gatherer Tool Use and Animal Exploitation
Results of protein residue and lithic microwear analyses are reported for Paleoindian and Early Archaic stone tools from a Carolina bay sand rim on the Aiken Plateau of South Carolina, USA. Protein residue analysis is performed using crossover Immunoelectrophoresis (CIEP), and indicates positive results for Bovidae, Cervidae, Galliformes, and Meleagris gallopavo. These results are complemented by a larger immunological study of 135 diagnostic haf…
A Multi-instrument Study of Microwear Polishes on Mousterian Tools from Weasel Cave ( Myshtulagty Lagat ), Russia
The functions of flaked stone tools are usually determined by the observation of microwear polishes with the incident-light microscope with magnifications of 50–400× – known as the Keeley Method. In our study into the function of Mousterian flint tools from Weasel Cave, we employ the atomic force microscope (AFM) and the optical interferometer, in addition to the light microscope and the SEM. The advantage of the AFM and the interferometer are th…
Archaeology (5 works) · Geography (5 works) · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (4 works) · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (4 works) · Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (3 works) · Geology (3 works) · Context (archaeology (2 works) · Acheulean (1 work) · Antler (1 work) · Archaeology and Rock Art Studies (1 work)