Sarah Teitt
Biographic Data
| ID | 4064896 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Sarah Teitt |
| GIVEN NAMES | Sarah |
| FAMILY NAME | Teitt |
| SIGNATURE | TEITT S |
| AFFILIATIONS | The University of Queensland |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-8348-831X |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 11 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 26 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 10 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 1 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2009 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Israel, Gaza, and the Unrealised Promise of the Responsibility to Protect
This article critically examines the Responsibility to Protect ( r2p ) in light of the war in Gaza, arguing that while the failure of the UN Security Council to act reflects deep geopolitical dysfunction and selective application of r2p , the norm remains relevant. Through analysis of legal, institutional, and diplomatic responses to atrocities in Gaza, the article highlights under-recognized (though undeniably inadequate) ways r2p continues to s…
R2P in Uncertainty: A Response to Hobson
Legitimacy and centrality under threat: The case for an Asean response to human rights violations against the Rohingya
The progression of genocide cases against Myanmar through the international justice system highlights the absence of an Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) response to the Rohingya crisis. This article argues that ASEAN's lack of intervention is undermining its legitimacy, and hence, centrality. The article begins by demonstrating that ASEAN's principles of noninterference and consensus have in the past been flexibly interpreted, and …
China–North Korea Relations: Between Development and Security
The Rohingya Crisis: Can Asean Salvage Its Credibility
In spite of ASEAN’s perceived inertia, there appears to be domestic pressure in key member states for a more activist approach
Contested Intervention: China, India, and the Responsibility to Protect
This article examines institutional patterns of leadership and followership in the UN Security Council with respect to the Responsibility to Protect principle. In a departure from existing literature on leadership and followership in international relations, which has hitherto been framed within a realist analysis, the article presents a constructivist account of leadership that sheds light on the strategies and scope of conditions for mobilizing…
Women, Peace and Security as an Asean priority
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Secretariat and its member states have repeatedly professed their commitment to the protection and advancement of women's economic and human rights. Such commitments have included the Declaration of the Advancement of Women in the ASEAN Region in 1988, the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women in the ASEAN Region in 2004, and the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration in 2012, as well …
Bridging the gap: Early warning, gender and the responsibility to protect
Women, Peace and Security (WPS) scholars and practitioners have expressed reservations about the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) principle because of its popular use as a synonym for armed humanitarian intervention. On the other hand, R2P’s early failure to engage with and advance WPS efforts such as United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolution 1325 (2000) has seen the perpetuation of limited roles ascribed to women in implementing the R2P p…
Engendering the Responsibility to Protect: Women and the Prevention of Mass Atrocities
This article explores the relationship between the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and the pursuit of the so-called ‘Women, Peace and Security’ (WPS) agenda at the UN. We ask whether the two agendas should continue to be pursued separately or whether each can make a useful contribution to the other. We argue that while the history of R2P has not included language that deliberately evokes the protection of women and the promotion of gender in prev…
The Responsibility to Protect and China's Peacekeeping Policy
When the term ‘responsibility to protect’ (R2P) was introduced in 2001, it was conceived as signifying a framework primarily aimed at legitimizing the use of force against states to protect populations from egregious abuse. China initially condemned the principle, then later endorsed R2P at the 2005 World Summit and reaffirmed its endorsement in the UN Security Council. This article examines the shift in China's position, which seems to run count…
Assessing Polemics, Principles and Practices: China and the Responsibility to Protect
This article offers an overview of subtle yet significant shifts in Beijing's stance on non-interference and evolving standards of responsible and responsive international engagement in humanitarian crises to highlight China's firm, but cautious, support for the responsibility to protect (R2P). Although it is reticent to apply sanctions and objects to nonconsensual force, China has clearly and consistently affirmed the R2P principle and issued co…
Women, Peace and Security as an Asean priority
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Secretariat and its member states have repeatedly professed their commitment to the protection and advancement of women's economic and human rights. Such commitments have included the Declaration of the Advancement of Women in the ASEAN Region in 1988, the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women in the ASEAN Region in 2004, and the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration in 2012, as well …
The Responsibility to Protect and China's Peacekeeping Policy
When the term ‘responsibility to protect’ (R2P) was introduced in 2001, it was conceived as signifying a framework primarily aimed at legitimizing the use of force against states to protect populations from egregious abuse. China initially condemned the principle, then later endorsed R2P at the 2005 World Summit and reaffirmed its endorsement in the UN Security Council. This article examines the shift in China's position, which seems to run count…
The Rohingya Crisis: Can Asean Salvage Its Credibility
In spite of ASEAN’s perceived inertia, there appears to be domestic pressure in key member states for a more activist approach
Contested Intervention: China, India, and the Responsibility to Protect
This article examines institutional patterns of leadership and followership in the UN Security Council with respect to the Responsibility to Protect principle. In a departure from existing literature on leadership and followership in international relations, which has hitherto been framed within a realist analysis, the article presents a constructivist account of leadership that sheds light on the strategies and scope of conditions for mobilizing…
Assessing Polemics, Principles and Practices: China and the Responsibility to Protect
This article offers an overview of subtle yet significant shifts in Beijing's stance on non-interference and evolving standards of responsible and responsive international engagement in humanitarian crises to highlight China's firm, but cautious, support for the responsibility to protect (R2P). Although it is reticent to apply sanctions and objects to nonconsensual force, China has clearly and consistently affirmed the R2P principle and issued co…
Engendering the Responsibility to Protect: Women and the Prevention of Mass Atrocities
This article explores the relationship between the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and the pursuit of the so-called ‘Women, Peace and Security’ (WPS) agenda at the UN. We ask whether the two agendas should continue to be pursued separately or whether each can make a useful contribution to the other. We argue that while the history of R2P has not included language that deliberately evokes the protection of women and the promotion of gender in prev…
Assessing Polemics, Principles and Practices: China and the Responsibility to Protect
This article offers an overview of subtle yet significant shifts in Beijing's stance on non-interference and evolving standards of responsible and responsive international engagement in humanitarian crises to highlight China's firm, but cautious, support for the responsibility to protect (R2P). Although it is reticent to apply sanctions and objects to nonconsensual force, China has clearly and consistently affirmed the R2P principle and issued co…
The Responsibility to Protect and China's Peacekeeping Policy
When the term ‘responsibility to protect’ (R2P) was introduced in 2001, it was conceived as signifying a framework primarily aimed at legitimizing the use of force against states to protect populations from egregious abuse. China initially condemned the principle, then later endorsed R2P at the 2005 World Summit and reaffirmed its endorsement in the UN Security Council. This article examines the shift in China's position, which seems to run count…
Engendering the Responsibility to Protect: Women and the Prevention of Mass Atrocities
This article explores the relationship between the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) and the pursuit of the so-called ‘Women, Peace and Security’ (WPS) agenda at the UN. We ask whether the two agendas should continue to be pursued separately or whether each can make a useful contribution to the other. We argue that while the history of R2P has not included language that deliberately evokes the protection of women and the promotion of gender in prev…
Women, Peace and Security as an Asean priority
The Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Secretariat and its member states have repeatedly professed their commitment to the protection and advancement of women's economic and human rights. Such commitments have included the Declaration of the Advancement of Women in the ASEAN Region in 1988, the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women in the ASEAN Region in 2004, and the ASEAN Human Rights Declaration in 2012, as well …
Bridging the gap: Early warning, gender and the responsibility to protect
Women, Peace and Security (WPS) scholars and practitioners have expressed reservations about the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) principle because of its popular use as a synonym for armed humanitarian intervention. On the other hand, R2P’s early failure to engage with and advance WPS efforts such as United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolution 1325 (2000) has seen the perpetuation of limited roles ascribed to women in implementing the R2P p…
Contested Intervention: China, India, and the Responsibility to Protect
This article examines institutional patterns of leadership and followership in the UN Security Council with respect to the Responsibility to Protect principle. In a departure from existing literature on leadership and followership in international relations, which has hitherto been framed within a realist analysis, the article presents a constructivist account of leadership that sheds light on the strategies and scope of conditions for mobilizing…
China–North Korea Relations: Between Development and Security
The Rohingya Crisis: Can Asean Salvage Its Credibility
In spite of ASEAN’s perceived inertia, there appears to be domestic pressure in key member states for a more activist approach
Legitimacy and centrality under threat: The case for an Asean response to human rights violations against the Rohingya
The progression of genocide cases against Myanmar through the international justice system highlights the absence of an Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN) response to the Rohingya crisis. This article argues that ASEAN's lack of intervention is undermining its legitimacy, and hence, centrality. The article begins by demonstrating that ASEAN's principles of noninterference and consensus have in the past been flexibly interpreted, and …
R2P in Uncertainty: A Response to Hobson
Israel, Gaza, and the Unrealised Promise of the Responsibility to Protect
This article critically examines the Responsibility to Protect ( r2p ) in light of the war in Gaza, arguing that while the failure of the UN Security Council to act reflects deep geopolitical dysfunction and selective application of r2p , the norm remains relevant. Through analysis of legal, institutional, and diplomatic responses to atrocities in Gaza, the article highlights under-recognized (though undeniably inadequate) ways r2p continues to s…
Political science (10 works) · Law (9 works) · Global Peace and Security Dynamics (8 works) · Law (8 works) · Responsibility to Protect (7 works) · Human rights (6 works) · International law (5 works) · Politics (5 works) · China (4 works) · International Development and Aid (4 works)