Janne Flyghed
Biographic Data
| ID | 4076454 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Janne Flyghed |
| GIVEN NAMES | Janne |
| FAMILY NAME | Flyghed |
| SIGNATURE | FLYGHED J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Stockholm University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 26 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 7 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2002 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Performing unbelonging in court. Observations from a transnational corporate bribery trial—a dramaturgical approach
This article presents a study of the theatrical performance in court in a high-profile transnational corporate bribery case. Data gathered from observations in court were supplemented with interviews with the defense teams and the presiding judge. The paper’s objective is to demonstrate how the defendants performed unbelonging in court via the interactions between the different ‘teams’ in the courtroom; the defense, the prosecutors, the judges, a…
Denials and confessions. An analysis of the temporalization of neutralizations of corporate crime
In recent years two Swedish companies, Telia and Lundin Petroleum, have had to work hard to legitimate their actions as a result of allegations of criminal activity. In this paper, the corporate framings employed to deal with allegations of crime will be analysed on the basis of Stanley Cohen's (2009) theoretical work on processes of denial and neutralization techniques. More specifically, the paper focuses on the temporalization of neutralizatio…
From “We Didn’t Do It” to “We’ve Learned Our Lesson
When corporations are faced with accusations of crime, they usually find it necessary to justify their actions to the public, the media and their shareholders. Corporate self-defense, aimed at protecting a corporation’s image and legitimacy, belongs to a broader category of offenders’ denials and neutralizations. The objective of this article is to compile and discuss literature that is of value for an understanding of neutralizations of corporat…
Exclusion or culture? The rise and the ambiguity of the radicalisation debate
The years 2005–2010 saw a sudden interest in the phenomenon of radicalisation. Terrorism was treated as the end result of a process of radicalisation and, as such, a reflection of broad social changes. In the discussion surrounding this phenomenon, radicalisation has not functioned as a homogenous analytical category. We analyse leading academic and administrative texts and identify two fundamentally different perspectives. One of these perspecti…
Repliker
Kriminalitetskontroll eller mänskliga rättigheter
Normalising the Exceptional
The article addresses the tension between effectively combating crime and the protection of civil rights and individual integrity. It asks what level of infringements on civil liberties is acceptable in order to keep criminal public order disturbances within reasonable limits. These questions are of special interest when it comes to violence with political overtones. Political violence has become subject to scrutiny in Europe after the top-summit…
Normalising the Exceptional
The article addresses the tension between effectively combating crime and the protection of civil rights and individual integrity. It asks what level of infringements on civil liberties is acceptable in order to keep criminal public order disturbances within reasonable limits. These questions are of special interest when it comes to violence with political overtones. Political violence has become subject to scrutiny in Europe after the top-summit…
Exclusion or culture? The rise and the ambiguity of the radicalisation debate
The years 2005–2010 saw a sudden interest in the phenomenon of radicalisation. Terrorism was treated as the end result of a process of radicalisation and, as such, a reflection of broad social changes. In the discussion surrounding this phenomenon, radicalisation has not functioned as a homogenous analytical category. We analyse leading academic and administrative texts and identify two fundamentally different perspectives. One of these perspecti…
From “We Didn’t Do It” to “We’ve Learned Our Lesson
When corporations are faced with accusations of crime, they usually find it necessary to justify their actions to the public, the media and their shareholders. Corporate self-defense, aimed at protecting a corporation’s image and legitimacy, belongs to a broader category of offenders’ denials and neutralizations. The objective of this article is to compile and discuss literature that is of value for an understanding of neutralizations of corporat…
Normalising the Exceptional
The article addresses the tension between effectively combating crime and the protection of civil rights and individual integrity. It asks what level of infringements on civil liberties is acceptable in order to keep criminal public order disturbances within reasonable limits. These questions are of special interest when it comes to violence with political overtones. Political violence has become subject to scrutiny in Europe after the top-summit…
Kriminalitetskontroll eller mänskliga rättigheter
Repliker
Exclusion or culture? The rise and the ambiguity of the radicalisation debate
The years 2005–2010 saw a sudden interest in the phenomenon of radicalisation. Terrorism was treated as the end result of a process of radicalisation and, as such, a reflection of broad social changes. In the discussion surrounding this phenomenon, radicalisation has not functioned as a homogenous analytical category. We analyse leading academic and administrative texts and identify two fundamentally different perspectives. One of these perspecti…
Denials and confessions. An analysis of the temporalization of neutralizations of corporate crime
In recent years two Swedish companies, Telia and Lundin Petroleum, have had to work hard to legitimate their actions as a result of allegations of criminal activity. In this paper, the corporate framings employed to deal with allegations of crime will be analysed on the basis of Stanley Cohen's (2009) theoretical work on processes of denial and neutralization techniques. More specifically, the paper focuses on the temporalization of neutralizatio…
From “We Didn’t Do It” to “We’ve Learned Our Lesson
When corporations are faced with accusations of crime, they usually find it necessary to justify their actions to the public, the media and their shareholders. Corporate self-defense, aimed at protecting a corporation’s image and legitimacy, belongs to a broader category of offenders’ denials and neutralizations. The objective of this article is to compile and discuss literature that is of value for an understanding of neutralizations of corporat…
Performing unbelonging in court. Observations from a transnational corporate bribery trial—a dramaturgical approach
This article presents a study of the theatrical performance in court in a high-profile transnational corporate bribery case. Data gathered from observations in court were supplemented with interviews with the defense teams and the presiding judge. The paper’s objective is to demonstrate how the defendants performed unbelonging in court via the interactions between the different ‘teams’ in the courtroom; the defense, the prosecutors, the judges, a…
Political science (6 works) · Sociology (6 works) · Law (5 works) · Criminology (4 works) · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (3 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (3 works) · Ambiguity (2 works) · Business (2 works)