Kenneth L Manning
Biographic Data
| ID | 4115277 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Kenneth L Manning |
| GIVEN NAMES | Kenneth L |
| FAMILY NAME | Manning |
| SIGNATURE | MANNING K L |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Massachusetts Dartmouth |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 57 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 6 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2004 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| H-INDEX | 4 |
The polarization of the judiciary
The polarization of political parties in the United States is a well-documented phenomenon. This paper considers polarization of the judicial branch and relates it to the evolution of the parties. In this paper we define polarization specifically as movement from a modal distribution (of votes, attitudes, or decisions) to a bimodal distribution along a liberal-conservative spectrum over time. Using data compiled from 90,000 United States District…
Gender, Critical Mass, and Judicial Decision Making
We examine the role of gender in legal decision making by applying critical mass theory to the U.S. federal district courts. We analyze whether behavioral differences manifest themselves in the decision-making proclivities of male and female judges, contingent on the existence of a critical mass of female judges at a court point (i.e., each city in which a district court is located). Our results indicate that women jurists exhibit distinctive beh…
The Gender Influence on US District Court Decisions
The present study contributes to the literature on federal lower court decision‐making as well as the broader body of research on gender effects on elite behavior by showing how gender, as a determinant of behavior, is filtered through other sociological determinants of decisional behavior. Starting with the assumption that personal attributes influence decision‐making patterns, our argument is that gender effects are not direct; rather, they sub…
Taking It to the Next Level
We address an important aspect of judicial careers: the elevation of judges from the U.S. District Courts to the Courts of Appeals. We argue that the likelihood of a judge being elevated is a function of informational cues and signals regarding the nature of the judge and the judge's compatibility with presidential preferences. We also expect norms involving the intersection between geography and Senate politics to affect a judge's elevation chan…
A Reply to Epstein and Martin's “Does Age (Really) Matter?”
Does Age Matter? Judicial Decision Making in Age Discrimination Cases
Objective. Drawing upon research that suggests that race and gender may shape judicial views about legal issues pertaining to these attributes, this study conducts an investigation of the influence of age on judicial decision making in age discrimination cases. Methods. This research analyzed 544 age bias rulings and 1,592 decisions in racial and gender discrimination cases handed down in the federal district courts from 1984 to 1995. Descriptive…
Gender, Critical Mass, and Judicial Decision Making
We examine the role of gender in legal decision making by applying critical mass theory to the U.S. federal district courts. We analyze whether behavioral differences manifest themselves in the decision-making proclivities of male and female judges, contingent on the existence of a critical mass of female judges at a court point (i.e., each city in which a district court is located). Our results indicate that women jurists exhibit distinctive beh…
Taking It to the Next Level
We address an important aspect of judicial careers: the elevation of judges from the U.S. District Courts to the Courts of Appeals. We argue that the likelihood of a judge being elevated is a function of informational cues and signals regarding the nature of the judge and the judge's compatibility with presidential preferences. We also expect norms involving the intersection between geography and Senate politics to affect a judge's elevation chan…
The Gender Influence on US District Court Decisions
The present study contributes to the literature on federal lower court decision‐making as well as the broader body of research on gender effects on elite behavior by showing how gender, as a determinant of behavior, is filtered through other sociological determinants of decisional behavior. Starting with the assumption that personal attributes influence decision‐making patterns, our argument is that gender effects are not direct; rather, they sub…
Does Age Matter? Judicial Decision Making in Age Discrimination Cases
Objective. Drawing upon research that suggests that race and gender may shape judicial views about legal issues pertaining to these attributes, this study conducts an investigation of the influence of age on judicial decision making in age discrimination cases. Methods. This research analyzed 544 age bias rulings and 1,592 decisions in racial and gender discrimination cases handed down in the federal district courts from 1984 to 1995. Descriptive…
The polarization of the judiciary
The polarization of political parties in the United States is a well-documented phenomenon. This paper considers polarization of the judicial branch and relates it to the evolution of the parties. In this paper we define polarization specifically as movement from a modal distribution (of votes, attitudes, or decisions) to a bimodal distribution along a liberal-conservative spectrum over time. Using data compiled from 90,000 United States District…
A Reply to Epstein and Martin's “Does Age (Really) Matter?”
Does Age Matter? Judicial Decision Making in Age Discrimination Cases
Objective. Drawing upon research that suggests that race and gender may shape judicial views about legal issues pertaining to these attributes, this study conducts an investigation of the influence of age on judicial decision making in age discrimination cases. Methods. This research analyzed 544 age bias rulings and 1,592 decisions in racial and gender discrimination cases handed down in the federal district courts from 1984 to 1995. Descriptive…
Taking It to the Next Level
We address an important aspect of judicial careers: the elevation of judges from the U.S. District Courts to the Courts of Appeals. We argue that the likelihood of a judge being elevated is a function of informational cues and signals regarding the nature of the judge and the judge's compatibility with presidential preferences. We also expect norms involving the intersection between geography and Senate politics to affect a judge's elevation chan…
The Gender Influence on US District Court Decisions
The present study contributes to the literature on federal lower court decision‐making as well as the broader body of research on gender effects on elite behavior by showing how gender, as a determinant of behavior, is filtered through other sociological determinants of decisional behavior. Starting with the assumption that personal attributes influence decision‐making patterns, our argument is that gender effects are not direct; rather, they sub…
Gender, Critical Mass, and Judicial Decision Making
We examine the role of gender in legal decision making by applying critical mass theory to the U.S. federal district courts. We analyze whether behavioral differences manifest themselves in the decision-making proclivities of male and female judges, contingent on the existence of a critical mass of female judges at a court point (i.e., each city in which a district court is located). Our results indicate that women jurists exhibit distinctive beh…
The polarization of the judiciary
The polarization of political parties in the United States is a well-documented phenomenon. This paper considers polarization of the judicial branch and relates it to the evolution of the parties. In this paper we define polarization specifically as movement from a modal distribution (of votes, attitudes, or decisions) to a bimodal distribution along a liberal-conservative spectrum over time. Using data compiled from 90,000 United States District…
Judicial and Constitutional Studies (5 works) · Law (5 works) · Political science (5 works) · Law (4 works) · Sociology (4 works) · Judicial opinion (3 works) · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (3 works) · Legal and Constitutional Studies (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works)