Frederick Liu
Biographic Data
| ID | 4122825 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Frederick Liu |
| GIVEN NAMES | Frederick |
| FAMILY NAME | Liu |
| SIGNATURE | LIU F |
| AFFILIATIONS | Princeton University |
| ORCID | 0009-0001-7468-8288 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 1 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 5 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 1 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2005 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2005 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
The Federal Marriage Amendment and the Strange Evolution of the Conservative Case against Gay Marriage
The idea for a Federal Marriage Amendment (FMA) did not suddenly dawn upon Senate Republicans in the summer of 2004, when debate on the amendment began in earnest on the floor of the U.S. Senate. Despite the passage of the federal Defense of Marriage Act in 1996, conservatives have long worried about what they believe are the threats to traditional heterosexual marriage posed by the courts. Their fears peaked in 2003, when the courts struck twice…
The Federal Marriage Amendment and the Strange Evolution of the Conservative Case against Gay Marriage
The idea for a Federal Marriage Amendment (FMA) did not suddenly dawn upon Senate Republicans in the summer of 2004, when debate on the amendment began in earnest on the floor of the U.S. Senate. Despite the passage of the federal Defense of Marriage Act in 1996, conservatives have long worried about what they believe are the threats to traditional heterosexual marriage posed by the courts. Their fears peaked in 2003, when the courts struck twice…
The Federal Marriage Amendment and the Strange Evolution of the Conservative Case against Gay Marriage
The idea for a Federal Marriage Amendment (FMA) did not suddenly dawn upon Senate Republicans in the summer of 2004, when debate on the amendment began in earnest on the floor of the U.S. Senate. Despite the passage of the federal Defense of Marriage Act in 1996, conservatives have long worried about what they believe are the threats to traditional heterosexual marriage posed by the courts. Their fears peaked in 2003, when the courts struck twice…
Gay rights (1 works) · Homosexuality (1 works) · Law (1 works) · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (1 works) · Political science (1 works) · Politics (1 works) · Reproductive Health and Technologies (1 works) · Sodomy (1 works) · Substantive due process (1 works) · Supreme court (1 works)