Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Anthony Francis Natoli

Biographic Data

ID4124970
NAMEAnthony Francis Natoli
GIVEN NAMESAnthony Francis
FAMILY NAMENatoli
SIGNATURENATOLI A F
AFFILIATIONSThe University of Sydney
ORCID0000-0002-3146-5455
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS2
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR2
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2015
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX0
  • To Rule, or Not to Rule? The ‘Happy Philosopher’ Crux of Plato’s Republic

    Open Access•Anthony Francis Natoli•ARTICLE•Polis The Journal for Ancient…•2025

    In what is a novel approach to the crux, I show that the hypothetical (εἰκός – ‘likely’ or ‘probable’: 519b7) refusal of philosophers to rule Kallipolis is presented as an error of judgement on their part. By acting proactively to alert philosophers to the error he says they are likely to make, Socrates ensures they will remain committed to their role as honest rulers, who because they spend most of their time in study could never be ‘lovers of r…

  • Socrates and Money

    Anthony Francis Natoli•ARTICLE•Mnemosyne•2015•References: 1

    The controversy over the translation of Plato, Apology 30b2-4 began officially with the publication of John Burnet’s Oxford edition and commentary in 1924. The aim of the present paper is to prove that the standard translation rejected by Burnet is both preferable on linguistic grounds and is also an accurate reflection of Socrates’ philosophical position in the Apology . In the first part of the paper, I present an augmented version of the argum…

No prominent works on this page.

  • Socrates and Money

    Anthony Francis Natoli•ARTICLE•Mnemosyne•2015•References: 1

    The controversy over the translation of Plato, Apology 30b2-4 began officially with the publication of John Burnet’s Oxford edition and commentary in 1924. The aim of the present paper is to prove that the standard translation rejected by Burnet is both preferable on linguistic grounds and is also an accurate reflection of Socrates’ philosophical position in the Apology . In the first part of the paper, I present an augmented version of the argum…

  • To Rule, or Not to Rule? The ‘Happy Philosopher’ Crux of Plato’s Republic

    Open Access•Anthony Francis Natoli•ARTICLE•Polis The Journal for Ancient…•2025

    In what is a novel approach to the crux, I show that the hypothetical (εἰκός – ‘likely’ or ‘probable’: 519b7) refusal of philosophers to rule Kallipolis is presented as an error of judgement on their part. By acting proactively to alert philosophers to the error he says they are likely to make, Socrates ensures they will remain committed to their role as honest rulers, who because they spend most of their time in study could never be ‘lovers of r…

Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 works) · Aphorism (1 work) · Argument (complex analysis (1 work) · Art (1 work) · Classical Antiquity Studies (1 work) · Context (archaeology (1 work) · Epistemology (1 work) · History (1 work) · History (1 work) · Law (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae