Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Jordan Jochim

Biographic Data

ID4125044
NAMEJordan Jochim
GIVEN NAMESJordan
FAMILY NAMEJochim
SIGNATUREJOCHIM J
AFFILIATIONSCornell University
ORCID0000-0003-3253-9142
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS5
TOTAL CITATIONS26
WORKS AS AUTHOR5
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2019
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX2
  • ‘Like a Master

    Jordan Jochim•ARTICLE•History of Political Thought•2026

    Aristotle is widely identified as foundational to the understanding of tyranny as a form of political enslavement, wherein the ruled are treated ‘like a slave’ insofar as they are subjected to the arbitrary will of another. This article challenges the collapse of Aristotelian tyranny into arbitrary rule by reconstructing what it means, on Aristotle’s understanding, for tyrants to rule ‘like a master’. Aristotle suggests that tyrants and slave mas…

  • Ruling Bodies

    Jordan Jochim•ARTICLE•Polis The Journal for Ancient…•2025

  • From Tyrannicide to Revolution

    Open Access•Jordan Jochim•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•2020•References: 31

    Treatments of collective action in political science, classical Greek history, and democratic theory often focus on the episodic and public-facing dimensions of dissent. This article turns to Aristotle for an account of solidaristic political action whose scale and tempo is sometimes obscured by such engagements. Revisiting The Athenian Constitution ’s account of the tyrannicides of 514 BCE and the democratic revolution of 508/7 BCE, I argue for …

  • Aristotle, Tyranny, and the Small-Souled Subject

    Open Access•Jordan Jochim•ARTICLE•Political Theory•2020•Cited by: 3

    Political theorists converge in identifying modern techniques of domination as habit-formative and psychologically invasive, in contrast to earlier, more blatantly coercive forms of repression. Putting Aristotle on tyranny in conversation with Michel Foucault on subject formation, this article argues for continuity across the pre- and postmodern divide. Through a close reading of the “three heads of tyranny” in Politics 5.11 (1314a13-29)—those be…

  • The monarchy of fear

    Open Access•Jordan Jochim•ARTICLE•Contemporary Political Theory•2019•Cited by: 23

  • The monarchy of fear

    Open Access•Jordan Jochim•ARTICLE•Contemporary Political Theory•2019•Cited by: 23

  • Aristotle, Tyranny, and the Small-Souled Subject

    Open Access•Jordan Jochim•ARTICLE•Political Theory•2020•Cited by: 3

    Political theorists converge in identifying modern techniques of domination as habit-formative and psychologically invasive, in contrast to earlier, more blatantly coercive forms of repression. Putting Aristotle on tyranny in conversation with Michel Foucault on subject formation, this article argues for continuity across the pre- and postmodern divide. Through a close reading of the “three heads of tyranny” in Politics 5.11 (1314a13-29)—those be…

  • The monarchy of fear

    Open Access•Jordan Jochim•ARTICLE•Contemporary Political Theory•2019•Cited by: 23

  • From Tyrannicide to Revolution

    Open Access•Jordan Jochim•ARTICLE•American Political Science Review•2020•References: 31

    Treatments of collective action in political science, classical Greek history, and democratic theory often focus on the episodic and public-facing dimensions of dissent. This article turns to Aristotle for an account of solidaristic political action whose scale and tempo is sometimes obscured by such engagements. Revisiting The Athenian Constitution ’s account of the tyrannicides of 514 BCE and the democratic revolution of 508/7 BCE, I argue for …

  • Aristotle, Tyranny, and the Small-Souled Subject

    Open Access•Jordan Jochim•ARTICLE•Political Theory•2020•Cited by: 3

    Political theorists converge in identifying modern techniques of domination as habit-formative and psychologically invasive, in contrast to earlier, more blatantly coercive forms of repression. Putting Aristotle on tyranny in conversation with Michel Foucault on subject formation, this article argues for continuity across the pre- and postmodern divide. Through a close reading of the “three heads of tyranny” in Politics 5.11 (1314a13-29)—those be…

  • Ruling Bodies

    Jordan Jochim•ARTICLE•Polis The Journal for Ancient…•2025

  • ‘Like a Master

    Jordan Jochim•ARTICLE•History of Political Thought•2026

    Aristotle is widely identified as foundational to the understanding of tyranny as a form of political enslavement, wherein the ruled are treated ‘like a slave’ insofar as they are subjected to the arbitrary will of another. This article challenges the collapse of Aristotelian tyranny into arbitrary rule by reconstructing what it means, on Aristotle’s understanding, for tyrants to rule ‘like a master’. Aristotle suggests that tyrants and slave mas…

Politics (4 works) · Law (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Political philosophy (2 works) · Religion and Society Interactions (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae