Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Peter G Caryl

Biographic Data

ID4126524
NAMEPeter G Caryl
GIVEN NAMESPeter G
FAMILY NAMECaryl
SIGNATURECARYL P G
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Edinburgh
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS3
TOTAL CITATIONS0
WORKS AS AUTHOR3
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1999
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2000
H-INDEX0
  • Testing versus understanding human intelligence

    Ian J Deary, Elizabeth J Austin et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2000•References: 5

    Intelligence may be studied in 2 distinct ways, using a psychometric or a biological approach. The psychometric approach is focused on the assessment of a person's level of mental ability and documents individual differences between people in mental abilities. Biological studies seek those brain functions that cause individual differences in human mental abilities. The lack of overlap between these approaches means that it is unclear what the sco…

  • Testing versus understanding human intelligence

    Ian J Deary, Elizabeth J Austin et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2000•References: 21

  • Psychology examiners re-examined

    Peter G Caryl•ARTICLE•Studies in Higher Education•1999

    Reliability and consistency of examination marking were examined across 5 years of a large second year psychology course (approximately 4800 examination answers). The analysis uses single-marked answers to assess variation in marker reliability and identify factors that influence this. Overall reliability of the examination ranged from 0.75 to 0.87. Reliability of marking was similar to that reported with double-marking and marks for specific que…

No prominent works on this page.

  • Psychology examiners re-examined

    Peter G Caryl•ARTICLE•Studies in Higher Education•1999

    Reliability and consistency of examination marking were examined across 5 years of a large second year psychology course (approximately 4800 examination answers). The analysis uses single-marked answers to assess variation in marker reliability and identify factors that influence this. Overall reliability of the examination ranged from 0.75 to 0.87. Reliability of marking was similar to that reported with double-marking and marks for specific que…

  • Testing versus understanding human intelligence

    Ian J Deary, Elizabeth J Austin et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2000•References: 5

    Intelligence may be studied in 2 distinct ways, using a psychometric or a biological approach. The psychometric approach is focused on the assessment of a person's level of mental ability and documents individual differences between people in mental abilities. Biological studies seek those brain functions that cause individual differences in human mental abilities. The lack of overlap between these approaches means that it is unclear what the sco…

  • Testing versus understanding human intelligence

    Ian J Deary, Elizabeth J Austin et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2000•References: 21

Psychology (3 works) · Cognitive Abilities and Testing (2 works) · Developmental psychology (2 works) · Human intelligence (2 works) · Artificial Intelligence (1 work) · Clinical Psychology (1 work) · Clinical Psychology (1 work) · Cognition (1 work) · Cognitive psychology (1 work) · Cognitive Science and Mapping (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae