Jennifer L Groscup
Biographic Data
| ID | 4126550 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jennifer L Groscup |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jennifer L |
| FAMILY NAME | Groscup |
| SIGNATURE | GROSCUP J L |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 9 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 4 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1997 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2002 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
The effects of Daubert on the adissibility of expert testimony in state and federal criminal cases
The effects of Daubert on the admissibility of expert testimony in state and federal criminal cases
Appellate opinions were evaluated on variables related to expert admissibility to assess the effects of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in criminal cases. Analysis reveals changes in appellate courts’ consideration of Frye v. United States, the 4 Daubert criteria, and several Federal Rules of Evidence. The importance of Frye and the general acceptance criterion decreased over time, and the importance of the Daubert criteria increased…
When mistakes happen: Commonsense rules of culpability
When mistakes happen: Commonsense rules of culpability
The effects of Daubert on the admissibility of expert testimony in state and federal criminal cases
Appellate opinions were evaluated on variables related to expert admissibility to assess the effects of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in criminal cases. Analysis reveals changes in appellate courts’ consideration of Frye v. United States, the 4 Daubert criteria, and several Federal Rules of Evidence. The importance of Frye and the general acceptance criterion decreased over time, and the importance of the Daubert criteria increased…
The effects of Daubert on the adissibility of expert testimony in state and federal criminal cases
When mistakes happen: Commonsense rules of culpability
When mistakes happen: Commonsense rules of culpability
When mistakes happen: Commonsense rules of culpability
The effects of Daubert on the adissibility of expert testimony in state and federal criminal cases
The effects of Daubert on the admissibility of expert testimony in state and federal criminal cases
Appellate opinions were evaluated on variables related to expert admissibility to assess the effects of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in criminal cases. Analysis reveals changes in appellate courts’ consideration of Frye v. United States, the 4 Daubert criteria, and several Federal Rules of Evidence. The importance of Frye and the general acceptance criterion decreased over time, and the importance of the Daubert criteria increased…
Criminology (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Jury Decision Making Processes (3 works) · Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (3 works) · Culpability (2 works) · Deception detection and forensic psychology (2 works) · Federal Rules of Evidence (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Academic integrity and plagiarism (1 works) · Admissible evidence (1 works)