Theodore Eisenberg
Biographic Data
| ID | 4126760 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Theodore Eisenberg |
| GIVEN NAMES | Theodore |
| FAMILY NAME | Eisenberg |
| SIGNATURE | EISENBERG T |
| AFFILIATIONS | Cornell University |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 12 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 4 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 11 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 1 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1982 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2016 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Comparative Law and Economics
Remedies and Damages
Group decision making on appellate panels
Appellate adjudication frequently involves small group decision making. Role responsibility theory and experimental evidence suggest that high status group members may disproportionately influence other members. A judicial panel’s presiding justice and the justice who writes a case’s opinion thus may influence other justices’ votes. We compare justices’ voting patterns in cases in which they presided and wrote opinions with their voting patterns …
Methodological Issues in the Analysis of Longitudinal Data
»Vielmehr bietet [der Kommentar] auf höchstem Niveau eine substantielle Auseinandersetzung mit den Hintergründen, den Zusammenhängen, der Theorie und der Praxis des Grundgesetzes. Besseres lässt sich von einem Verfassungskommentar nicht sagen.“ Herbert Günther Staaatsanzeiger für das Land Hessen 2018 (50), 1494–1495
Variability in Punitive Damages
Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker acknowledged that empirical studies undercut criticism of punitive damages. Paradoxically, the Court simultaneously expressed concern about jury predictability based on a high and variable punitive-compensatory ratio published in an article by the present authors. The Court reduced the $2.5 billion Exxon Valdez punitive award to $500 million and stated: »the constitutional outer limit may well be 1:1.« Our empirical fi…
Evidence of the Need for Aggregate Litigation
»Vielmehr bietet [der Kommentar] auf höchstem Niveau eine substantielle Auseinandersetzung mit den Hintergründen, den Zusammenhängen, der Theorie und der Praxis des Grundgesetzes. Besseres lässt sich von einem Verfassungskommentar nicht sagen.“ Herbert Günther Staaatsanzeiger für das Land Hessen 2018 (50), 1494–1495
Reconciling Experimental Incoherence with Real-World Coherence in Punitive Damages
Theodore Eisenberg, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, Martin T. Wells, Reconciling Experimental Incoherence with Real-World Coherence in Punitive Damages, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 54, No. 6 (Jun., 2002), pp. 1239-1271
Negotiation, Lawyering, and Adjudication
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Negotiation, Lawyering, and Adjudication
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Baseline Problems in Assessing Chapter 11
Theodore Eisenberg, Baseline Problems in Assessing Chapter 11, The University of Toronto Law Journal, Vol. 43, No. 3, Special Issue on Corporate Stakeholder Debate: The Classical Theory and Its Critics (Summer, 1993), pp. 633-677
A Bankruptcy Machine That Would Go of Itself
Affective changes in socially disadvantaged children as a result of one to one tutoring
Group decision making on appellate panels
Appellate adjudication frequently involves small group decision making. Role responsibility theory and experimental evidence suggest that high status group members may disproportionately influence other members. A judicial panel’s presiding justice and the justice who writes a case’s opinion thus may influence other justices’ votes. We compare justices’ voting patterns in cases in which they presided and wrote opinions with their voting patterns …
Affective changes in socially disadvantaged children as a result of one to one tutoring
A Bankruptcy Machine That Would Go of Itself
Baseline Problems in Assessing Chapter 11
Theodore Eisenberg, Baseline Problems in Assessing Chapter 11, The University of Toronto Law Journal, Vol. 43, No. 3, Special Issue on Corporate Stakeholder Debate: The Classical Theory and Its Critics (Summer, 1993), pp. 633-677
Negotiation, Lawyering, and Adjudication
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Negotiation, Lawyering, and Adjudication
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Reconciling Experimental Incoherence with Real-World Coherence in Punitive Damages
Theodore Eisenberg, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, Martin T. Wells, Reconciling Experimental Incoherence with Real-World Coherence in Punitive Damages, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 54, No. 6 (Jun., 2002), pp. 1239-1271
Evidence of the Need for Aggregate Litigation
»Vielmehr bietet [der Kommentar] auf höchstem Niveau eine substantielle Auseinandersetzung mit den Hintergründen, den Zusammenhängen, der Theorie und der Praxis des Grundgesetzes. Besseres lässt sich von einem Verfassungskommentar nicht sagen.“ Herbert Günther Staaatsanzeiger für das Land Hessen 2018 (50), 1494–1495
Variability in Punitive Damages
Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker acknowledged that empirical studies undercut criticism of punitive damages. Paradoxically, the Court simultaneously expressed concern about jury predictability based on a high and variable punitive-compensatory ratio published in an article by the present authors. The Court reduced the $2.5 billion Exxon Valdez punitive award to $500 million and stated: »the constitutional outer limit may well be 1:1.« Our empirical fi…
Methodological Issues in the Analysis of Longitudinal Data
»Vielmehr bietet [der Kommentar] auf höchstem Niveau eine substantielle Auseinandersetzung mit den Hintergründen, den Zusammenhängen, der Theorie und der Praxis des Grundgesetzes. Besseres lässt sich von einem Verfassungskommentar nicht sagen.“ Herbert Günther Staaatsanzeiger für das Land Hessen 2018 (50), 1494–1495
Group decision making on appellate panels
Appellate adjudication frequently involves small group decision making. Role responsibility theory and experimental evidence suggest that high status group members may disproportionately influence other members. A judicial panel’s presiding justice and the justice who writes a case’s opinion thus may influence other justices’ votes. We compare justices’ voting patterns in cases in which they presided and wrote opinions with their voting patterns …
Remedies and Damages
Comparative Law and Economics
Law (8 works) · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (8 works) · Political science (8 works) · Business (5 works) · Economics (4 works) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (4 works) · Legal principles and applications (4 works) · Damages (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Legal and Constitutional Studies (3 works)