Dennis J Devine
Biographic Data
| ID | 4126929 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Dennis J Devine |
| GIVEN NAMES | Dennis J |
| FAMILY NAME | Devine |
| SIGNATURE | DEVINE D J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 45 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 4 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2001 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
The impact of pretrial publicity on mock juror and jury verdicts: A meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: We updated and extended a meta-analysis on pretrial publicity (PTP) conducted by Steblay et al. (1999) by reexamining the effect of negative (antidefendant) PTP on individual (juror) and deliberating group (jury) verdicts and the effect of positive (pro-defendant) PTP on individual verdicts. HYPOTHESES: We hypothesized that exposure to negative PTP would increase guilty verdicts from both jurors and juries, whereas exposure to positive…
Life or death: An examination of jury sentencing with the Capital Jury Project database
Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments
Many people believe the personal attributes of trial participants substantially impact the decisions of juries, and considerable research has examined the extent to which characteristics of jurors and defendants are associated with juror judgments of guilt. To assess this broad issue, we meta-analyzed empirical studies examining the relationship between 11 juror and defendant characteristics and individual-level judgments of guilt in criminal tri…
Jury decision making: 45 Years of Empirical Research on Deliberating Groups
This article provides a comprehensive review of the empirical research on jury decision making published between 1955 and 1999. In total, 206 distinguishable studies involving deliberating juries (actual or mock) were located and grouped into 4 categories on the basis of their focal variables: (a) procedural characteristics, (b) participant characteristics, (c) case characteristics, and (d) deliberation characteristics. Numerous factors were foun…
Jury decision making: 45 Years of Empirical Research on Deliberating Groups
This article provides a comprehensive review of the empirical research on jury decision making published between 1955 and 1999. In total, 206 distinguishable studies involving deliberating juries (actual or mock) were located and grouped into 4 categories on the basis of their focal variables: (a) procedural characteristics, (b) participant characteristics, (c) case characteristics, and (d) deliberation characteristics. Numerous factors were foun…
Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments
Many people believe the personal attributes of trial participants substantially impact the decisions of juries, and considerable research has examined the extent to which characteristics of jurors and defendants are associated with juror judgments of guilt. To assess this broad issue, we meta-analyzed empirical studies examining the relationship between 11 juror and defendant characteristics and individual-level judgments of guilt in criminal tri…
Life or death: An examination of jury sentencing with the Capital Jury Project database
Jury decision making: 45 Years of Empirical Research on Deliberating Groups
This article provides a comprehensive review of the empirical research on jury decision making published between 1955 and 1999. In total, 206 distinguishable studies involving deliberating juries (actual or mock) were located and grouped into 4 categories on the basis of their focal variables: (a) procedural characteristics, (b) participant characteristics, (c) case characteristics, and (d) deliberation characteristics. Numerous factors were foun…
Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments
Many people believe the personal attributes of trial participants substantially impact the decisions of juries, and considerable research has examined the extent to which characteristics of jurors and defendants are associated with juror judgments of guilt. To assess this broad issue, we meta-analyzed empirical studies examining the relationship between 11 juror and defendant characteristics and individual-level judgments of guilt in criminal tri…
Life or death: An examination of jury sentencing with the Capital Jury Project database
The impact of pretrial publicity on mock juror and jury verdicts: A meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: We updated and extended a meta-analysis on pretrial publicity (PTP) conducted by Steblay et al. (1999) by reexamining the effect of negative (antidefendant) PTP on individual (juror) and deliberating group (jury) verdicts and the effect of positive (pro-defendant) PTP on individual verdicts. HYPOTHESES: We hypothesized that exposure to negative PTP would increase guilty verdicts from both jurors and juries, whereas exposure to positive…
Jury Decision Making Processes (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Jury (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 works) · Artificial Intelligence in Law (1 works) · Cognitive psychology (1 works) · Computer Science (1 works)