Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Christina A Studebaker

Biographic Data

ID4127248
NAMEChristina A Studebaker
GIVEN NAMESChristina A
FAMILY NAMEStudebaker
SIGNATURESTUDEBAKER C A
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS3
TOTAL CITATIONS11
AUTHOR COUNT3
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1997
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2002
H-INDEX2
  • The effects of Daubert on the adissibility of expert testimony in state and federal criminal cases

    Jennifer Groscup, Jennifer L Groscup et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2002•Cited by: 2

  • The effects of Daubert on the admissibility of expert testimony in state and federal criminal cases

    Jennifer Groscup, Jennifer L Groscup et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2002•Cited by: 6•References: 1

    Appellate opinions were evaluated on variables related to expert admissibility to assess the effects of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in criminal cases. Analysis reveals changes in appellate courts’ consideration of Frye v. United States, the 4 Daubert criteria, and several Federal Rules of Evidence. The importance of Frye and the general acceptance criterion decreased over time, and the importance of the Daubert criteria increased…

  • Pretrial publicity: The media, the law, and common sense

    Christina A Studebaker, Steven D Penrod et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1997•Cited by: 3

    As media coverage becomes more extensive and accessible, it is likely to become more difficult to find jurors who have not been exposed to relevant pretrial publicity. Courts' assessments of the likelihood that pretrial publicity has resulted in prejudice against a defendant and of jurors' ability to disregard any prejudice are often based on judicial common sense and often reflect a misappraisal or misunderstanding of the capabilities and weakne…

  • The effects of Daubert on the admissibility of expert testimony in state and federal criminal cases

    Jennifer Groscup, Jennifer L Groscup et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2002•Cited by: 6•References: 1

    Appellate opinions were evaluated on variables related to expert admissibility to assess the effects of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in criminal cases. Analysis reveals changes in appellate courts’ consideration of Frye v. United States, the 4 Daubert criteria, and several Federal Rules of Evidence. The importance of Frye and the general acceptance criterion decreased over time, and the importance of the Daubert criteria increased…

  • Pretrial publicity: The media, the law, and common sense

    Christina A Studebaker, Steven D Penrod et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1997•Cited by: 3

    As media coverage becomes more extensive and accessible, it is likely to become more difficult to find jurors who have not been exposed to relevant pretrial publicity. Courts' assessments of the likelihood that pretrial publicity has resulted in prejudice against a defendant and of jurors' ability to disregard any prejudice are often based on judicial common sense and often reflect a misappraisal or misunderstanding of the capabilities and weakne…

  • The effects of Daubert on the adissibility of expert testimony in state and federal criminal cases

    Jennifer Groscup, Jennifer L Groscup et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2002•Cited by: 2

  • Pretrial publicity: The media, the law, and common sense

    Christina A Studebaker, Steven D Penrod et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•1997•Cited by: 3

    As media coverage becomes more extensive and accessible, it is likely to become more difficult to find jurors who have not been exposed to relevant pretrial publicity. Courts' assessments of the likelihood that pretrial publicity has resulted in prejudice against a defendant and of jurors' ability to disregard any prejudice are often based on judicial common sense and often reflect a misappraisal or misunderstanding of the capabilities and weakne…

  • The effects of Daubert on the adissibility of expert testimony in state and federal criminal cases

    Jennifer Groscup, Jennifer L Groscup et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2002•Cited by: 2

  • The effects of Daubert on the admissibility of expert testimony in state and federal criminal cases

    Jennifer Groscup, Jennifer L Groscup et al.•ARTICLE•Psychology Public Policy and Law•2002•Cited by: 6•References: 1

    Appellate opinions were evaluated on variables related to expert admissibility to assess the effects of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in criminal cases. Analysis reveals changes in appellate courts’ consideration of Frye v. United States, the 4 Daubert criteria, and several Federal Rules of Evidence. The importance of Frye and the general acceptance criterion decreased over time, and the importance of the Daubert criteria increased…

Political science (3 works) · Criminology (2 works) · Federal Rules of Evidence (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Academic integrity and plagiarism (1 works) · Admissible evidence (1 works) · Algorithm (1 works) · Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae