Jesse W Campbell
Biographic Data
| ID | 4127843 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jesse W Campbell |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jesse W |
| FAMILY NAME | Campbell |
| SIGNATURE | CAMPBELL J W |
| AFFILIATIONS | Incheon National University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-0376-5362 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 9 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 18 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 9 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2013 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Policy implementation as social justice: A realist review of administrative burden research
Administrative burden’s impact on distributive justice is well documented, but its effects on the procedural and interactional dimensions of social justice are less understood. Through a realist review of 104 articles, we identify eight mechanisms – administrative neutrality, marketization, devolution, means testing, benefit conditionality, service personalization, service digitization, and frontline discretion – that shape social justice outcome…
Institutional Independence, Credible Commitment, and Anti-corruption Reform Failure in Developing Contexts: Three Illustrative Examples from Indonesia
Marketization and Public Service Motivation: Cross-Country Evidence of a Deleterious Effect
The introduction of market-based competition into the public service delivery process may incentivize desirable bureaucratic behaviors but may also have unintended effects. Using a sample of public servants from 48 countries and cross-country estimates of public service marketization, this study provides evidence of a competition-based erosion of public service motivation (PSM). Second, using three different estimates of external market competiti…
The ontology, origin, and impact of divisive public sector rules: A meta‐narrative review of the red tape and administrative burden literatures
A rule is divisive when its legitimacy is contested and divisive rules are an enduring theme of public administration research. For over three decades, this research has been shaped by red tape theory, which conceptualizes divisive rules as those which consume an organization's resources but fail to advance its goals. Recently, however, the administrative burden framework, which prioritizes the impact of divisive rules on citizens and links their…
Red Tape, Rule Legitimacy, and Public Service Motivation: Experimental Evidence From Korean Citizens
While legitimacy plays a key role in determining if a public sector rule or process objectively qualifies as red tape, it is unclear if legitimacy shapes subjective red tape judgments. We use a sample of South Korean citizens and a vignette-based survey experiment describing applying for a small business COVID-19 relief fund to test the relevance of rule legitimacy for perceived red tape. We find that obtaining a favorable outcome (receiving the …
Buying the honor of thieves? Performance pay, political patronage, and corruption
Dataveillant Collectivism and the Coronavirus in Korea: Values, Biases, and Socio-Cultural Foundations of Containment Efforts
COVID-19 is as much a social as a biological problem and securing mass compliance with public health directives is a necessary condition of suppressing the pandemic. South Korea's containment has been characterized by high levels of such compliance We contend that Korea's neo-Confucian traditions, ongoing exposure to diverse existential threats, and technology-driven development inform a set of biases and social practices that facilitate positive…
Citizen Preference and Resource Allocation: The Case for Participatory Budgeting in Seoul
This article seeks to measure the extent to which the service priorities of citizens of Seoul, South Korea, are reflected in corresponding resource allocations in the city's budget, despite there being virtually no participation by citizens in the budget creation process. We find a less than perfect congruence between budget allocations and citizen preferences at both the city and district level. Given these results, we discuss the potential for …
Revisiting Confucian Bureaucracy: Roots of the Korean Government's Culture and Competitiveness
This paper looks at Korea's Chosun dynasty bureaucracy and the Neo‐Confucian principles that formed the basis of its governing philosophy. We argue that Korea's traditional bureaucracy had a number of modern characteristics, including a system of formal and informal checks on the powers of the sovereign and a decision‐making system that encouraged deliberation among highly qualified civil servants. On the basis of this exposition, we also argue t…
Citizen Preference and Resource Allocation: The Case for Participatory Budgeting in Seoul
This article seeks to measure the extent to which the service priorities of citizens of Seoul, South Korea, are reflected in corresponding resource allocations in the city's budget, despite there being virtually no participation by citizens in the budget creation process. We find a less than perfect congruence between budget allocations and citizen preferences at both the city and district level. Given these results, we discuss the potential for …
Dataveillant Collectivism and the Coronavirus in Korea: Values, Biases, and Socio-Cultural Foundations of Containment Efforts
COVID-19 is as much a social as a biological problem and securing mass compliance with public health directives is a necessary condition of suppressing the pandemic. South Korea's containment has been characterized by high levels of such compliance We contend that Korea's neo-Confucian traditions, ongoing exposure to diverse existential threats, and technology-driven development inform a set of biases and social practices that facilitate positive…
Red Tape, Rule Legitimacy, and Public Service Motivation: Experimental Evidence From Korean Citizens
While legitimacy plays a key role in determining if a public sector rule or process objectively qualifies as red tape, it is unclear if legitimacy shapes subjective red tape judgments. We use a sample of South Korean citizens and a vignette-based survey experiment describing applying for a small business COVID-19 relief fund to test the relevance of rule legitimacy for perceived red tape. We find that obtaining a favorable outcome (receiving the …
Buying the honor of thieves? Performance pay, political patronage, and corruption
Revisiting Confucian Bureaucracy: Roots of the Korean Government's Culture and Competitiveness
This paper looks at Korea's Chosun dynasty bureaucracy and the Neo‐Confucian principles that formed the basis of its governing philosophy. We argue that Korea's traditional bureaucracy had a number of modern characteristics, including a system of formal and informal checks on the powers of the sovereign and a decision‐making system that encouraged deliberation among highly qualified civil servants. On the basis of this exposition, we also argue t…
Citizen Preference and Resource Allocation: The Case for Participatory Budgeting in Seoul
This article seeks to measure the extent to which the service priorities of citizens of Seoul, South Korea, are reflected in corresponding resource allocations in the city's budget, despite there being virtually no participation by citizens in the budget creation process. We find a less than perfect congruence between budget allocations and citizen preferences at both the city and district level. Given these results, we discuss the potential for …
Buying the honor of thieves? Performance pay, political patronage, and corruption
Dataveillant Collectivism and the Coronavirus in Korea: Values, Biases, and Socio-Cultural Foundations of Containment Efforts
COVID-19 is as much a social as a biological problem and securing mass compliance with public health directives is a necessary condition of suppressing the pandemic. South Korea's containment has been characterized by high levels of such compliance We contend that Korea's neo-Confucian traditions, ongoing exposure to diverse existential threats, and technology-driven development inform a set of biases and social practices that facilitate positive…
Red Tape, Rule Legitimacy, and Public Service Motivation: Experimental Evidence From Korean Citizens
While legitimacy plays a key role in determining if a public sector rule or process objectively qualifies as red tape, it is unclear if legitimacy shapes subjective red tape judgments. We use a sample of South Korean citizens and a vignette-based survey experiment describing applying for a small business COVID-19 relief fund to test the relevance of rule legitimacy for perceived red tape. We find that obtaining a favorable outcome (receiving the …
Marketization and Public Service Motivation: Cross-Country Evidence of a Deleterious Effect
The introduction of market-based competition into the public service delivery process may incentivize desirable bureaucratic behaviors but may also have unintended effects. Using a sample of public servants from 48 countries and cross-country estimates of public service marketization, this study provides evidence of a competition-based erosion of public service motivation (PSM). Second, using three different estimates of external market competiti…
The ontology, origin, and impact of divisive public sector rules: A meta‐narrative review of the red tape and administrative burden literatures
A rule is divisive when its legitimacy is contested and divisive rules are an enduring theme of public administration research. For over three decades, this research has been shaped by red tape theory, which conceptualizes divisive rules as those which consume an organization's resources but fail to advance its goals. Recently, however, the administrative burden framework, which prioritizes the impact of divisive rules on citizens and links their…
Institutional Independence, Credible Commitment, and Anti-corruption Reform Failure in Developing Contexts: Three Illustrative Examples from Indonesia
Policy implementation as social justice: A realist review of administrative burden research
Administrative burden’s impact on distributive justice is well documented, but its effects on the procedural and interactional dimensions of social justice are less understood. Through a realist review of 104 articles, we identify eight mechanisms – administrative neutrality, marketization, devolution, means testing, benefit conditionality, service personalization, service digitization, and frontline discretion – that shape social justice outcome…
Political science (9 works) · Economics (6 works) · Law (6 works) · Politics (5 works) · Public Policy and Administration Research (5 works) · Sociology (5 works) · Business (4 works) · Marketing (4 works) · Public economics (4 works) · Public relations (4 works)