Benedicto Acosta
Biographic Data
| ID | 4128332 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Benedicto Acosta |
| GIVEN NAMES | Benedicto |
| FAMILY NAME | Acosta |
| SIGNATURE | ACOSTA B |
| AFFILIATIONS | Universidad de Salamanca |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-0878-0657 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Scientific Article and Scientific Objectivity
This paper examines how scientific articles aim to secure scientific objectivity. It begins by reconstructing the historical and rhetorical context of the research paper as the dominant medium of scientific communication. The central claim is that the paper’s rhetorical-editorial features—IMRaD structure, clarity, suppression of subjectivity, and stylistic flattening—seek to reinforce the credibility and legitimacy of science while also functioni…
Responsibility for AI Inventions
Responsibility for the activities and products generated by artificial intelligence (AI) is a topic currently debated by scholars. However, less attention has been given to the case of inventions created by AI. Who should be held responsible for these inventions? How can we address the negative consequences arising from AI-generated inventions? In this article, we aim to highlight some unique aspects of responsibility related to this specific typ…
Impartiality at the Patent Office
Social contract is one of the most common schemes for justifying patents. According to this theory, inventors obtain a commercial exclusivity in exchange for the disclosure of the invention, with the final aim of allowing others to use that knowledge in future innovations. Under the rationale of this social contract theory of patents, if a patent system is not guided by impartiality in its decisions, the relation between disclosure of inventions …
Género y patentes
El objetivo de este artículo es exponer el estado de la cuestión sobre los estudios de género en patentes. En la introducción, se detalla el interés de esta revisión y se hacen unas breves notas sobre la naturaleza de los sistemas de patentes. A continuación, se relacionan una serie de investigaciones, sobre todo en su vertiente teórica: primero en relación con el problema de las brechas de género en patentes y, más adelante, sobre el problema de…
No prominent works on this page.
Género y patentes
El objetivo de este artículo es exponer el estado de la cuestión sobre los estudios de género en patentes. En la introducción, se detalla el interés de esta revisión y se hacen unas breves notas sobre la naturaleza de los sistemas de patentes. A continuación, se relacionan una serie de investigaciones, sobre todo en su vertiente teórica: primero en relación con el problema de las brechas de género en patentes y, más adelante, sobre el problema de…
Impartiality at the Patent Office
Social contract is one of the most common schemes for justifying patents. According to this theory, inventors obtain a commercial exclusivity in exchange for the disclosure of the invention, with the final aim of allowing others to use that knowledge in future innovations. Under the rationale of this social contract theory of patents, if a patent system is not guided by impartiality in its decisions, the relation between disclosure of inventions …
Responsibility for AI Inventions
Responsibility for the activities and products generated by artificial intelligence (AI) is a topic currently debated by scholars. However, less attention has been given to the case of inventions created by AI. Who should be held responsible for these inventions? How can we address the negative consequences arising from AI-generated inventions? In this article, we aim to highlight some unique aspects of responsibility related to this specific typ…
Scientific Article and Scientific Objectivity
This paper examines how scientific articles aim to secure scientific objectivity. It begins by reconstructing the historical and rhetorical context of the research paper as the dominant medium of scientific communication. The central claim is that the paper’s rhetorical-editorial features—IMRaD structure, clarity, suppression of subjectivity, and stylistic flattening—seek to reinforce the credibility and legitimacy of science while also functioni…
Innovation Policy and RD (2 works) · Intellectual Property and Patents (2 works) · Art (1 work) · Business (1 work) · Christian ministry (1 work) · Conflict of interest (1 work) · Corporate governance (1 work) · Corporate social responsibility (1 work) · Credibility (1 work) · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (1 work)