Lucile Eznack
Biographic Data
| ID | 4134666 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Lucile Eznack |
| GIVEN NAMES | Lucile |
| FAMILY NAME | Eznack |
| SIGNATURE | EZNACK L |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Geneva |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 12 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2011 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2013 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
The Mood Was Grave
Recent developments in international relations and international security scholarship emphasize the need to consider emotions in explaining interstate behaviour. Less work has been done exploring the difference between emotions – or emotional reactions – and the longer-term affective dispositions they can trigger, affecting foreign and security policy. Affective dispositions towards objects, it is argued here, provoke different emotional reaction…
Crises in the Atlantic Alliance
Through a theoretical and empirical examination of the 1956 Suez Crisis, the 1966 NATO crisis, and the 2003 Iraq crisis, Eznack explores the connections between affect and emotion, the occurrence of c
Crises as Signals of Strength
Affect exists among close allies and influences their actions and reactions vis-à-vis each other. These countries’ perceptions of, and affective attachment to, the specialness of their relationships explains why, in certain circumstances, big clashes occur among them. In this sense, affect explains why crises among close allies are more signals of strength than weakness: the passionate nature of such crises—as opposed to more routine or recurrent…
Crises as Signals of Strength
Affect exists among close allies and influences their actions and reactions vis-à-vis each other. These countries’ perceptions of, and affective attachment to, the specialness of their relationships explains why, in certain circumstances, big clashes occur among them. In this sense, affect explains why crises among close allies are more signals of strength than weakness: the passionate nature of such crises—as opposed to more routine or recurrent…
The Mood Was Grave
Recent developments in international relations and international security scholarship emphasize the need to consider emotions in explaining interstate behaviour. Less work has been done exploring the difference between emotions – or emotional reactions – and the longer-term affective dispositions they can trigger, affecting foreign and security policy. Affective dispositions towards objects, it is argued here, provoke different emotional reaction…
Crises as Signals of Strength
Affect exists among close allies and influences their actions and reactions vis-à-vis each other. These countries’ perceptions of, and affective attachment to, the specialness of their relationships explains why, in certain circumstances, big clashes occur among them. In this sense, affect explains why crises among close allies are more signals of strength than weakness: the passionate nature of such crises—as opposed to more routine or recurrent…
Crises in the Atlantic Alliance
Through a theoretical and empirical examination of the 1956 Suez Crisis, the 1966 NATO crisis, and the 2003 Iraq crisis, Eznack explores the connections between affect and emotion, the occurrence of c
The Mood Was Grave
Recent developments in international relations and international security scholarship emphasize the need to consider emotions in explaining interstate behaviour. Less work has been done exploring the difference between emotions – or emotional reactions – and the longer-term affective dispositions they can trigger, affecting foreign and security policy. Affective dispositions towards objects, it is argued here, provoke different emotional reaction…
International Relations and Foreign Policy (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Psychology (3 works) · Affect (linguistics) (2 works) · Economics (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Alliance (1 work) · Anger (1 work) · Argument (complex analysis (1 work) · Argument (complex analysis) (1 work)