Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Angie Pepper

Biographic Data

ID4154205
NAMEAngie Pepper
GIVEN NAMESAngie
FAMILY NAMEPepper
SIGNATUREPEPPER A
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Roehampton
ORCID0000-0002-2608-667X
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS6
WORKS AS AUTHOR6
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2014
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX1
  • Letting Beings Be

    Open Access•Angie Pepper•ARTICLE•Humanimalia•2024

    Review of: Gary Steiner, What We Owe to Nonhuman Animals: The Historical Pretensions of Reason and The Ideal of Felt Kinship. Routledge Human–Animal Studies Series. London: Routledge, 2024. x + 269 pp. £36.99 (pb), £135.00 (hb

  • Interspecies justice

    Open Access•Richard Healey, Angie Pepper•ARTICLE•Philosophical Studies•2021

  • Political Agency in Humans and Other Animals

    Open Access•Angie Pepper•ARTICLE•Contemporary Political Theory•2021•Cited by: 5•References: 32

  • Glass Panels and Peepholes

    Open Access•Angie Pepper•ARTICLE•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2020

    In this paper, I defend the claim that many sentient nonhuman animals have a right to privacy. I begin by outlining the view that the human right to privacy protects our interest in shaping different kinds of relationships with one another by giving us control over how we present ourselves to others. I then draw on empirical research to show that nonhuman animals also have this interest, which grounds a right to privacy against us. I further argu…

  • Beyond Anthropocentrism

    Open Access•Angie Pepper•ARTICLE•Global Justice Theory Practice…•2017

    All cosmopolitan approaches to global distributive justice are premised on the idea that humans are the primary units of moral concern. In this paper, I argue that neither relational nor non-relational cosmopolitans can unquestioningly assume the moral primacy of humans. Furthermore, I argue that, by their own lights, cosmopolitans must extend the scope of justice to most, if not all, nonhuman animals. To demonstrate that cosmopolitans cannot sim…

  • A feminist argument against statism

    Angie Pepper•ARTICLE•Journal of Global Ethics•2014•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    Cosmopolitanism and statism represent the two dominant liberal theoretical standpoints in the current debate on global distributive justice. In this paper, I will develop a feminist argument that recommends that statist approaches be rejected. This argument has its roots in the feminist critique of liberal theories of social justice. In Justice, Gender, and the Family Susan Moller Okin argues that many liberal egalitarian theories of justice are …

  • Political Agency in Humans and Other Animals

    Open Access•Angie Pepper•ARTICLE•Contemporary Political Theory•2021•Cited by: 5•References: 32

  • A feminist argument against statism

    Angie Pepper•ARTICLE•Journal of Global Ethics•2014•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    Cosmopolitanism and statism represent the two dominant liberal theoretical standpoints in the current debate on global distributive justice. In this paper, I will develop a feminist argument that recommends that statist approaches be rejected. This argument has its roots in the feminist critique of liberal theories of social justice. In Justice, Gender, and the Family Susan Moller Okin argues that many liberal egalitarian theories of justice are …

  • A feminist argument against statism

    Angie Pepper•ARTICLE•Journal of Global Ethics•2014•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    Cosmopolitanism and statism represent the two dominant liberal theoretical standpoints in the current debate on global distributive justice. In this paper, I will develop a feminist argument that recommends that statist approaches be rejected. This argument has its roots in the feminist critique of liberal theories of social justice. In Justice, Gender, and the Family Susan Moller Okin argues that many liberal egalitarian theories of justice are …

  • Beyond Anthropocentrism

    Open Access•Angie Pepper•ARTICLE•Global Justice Theory Practice…•2017

    All cosmopolitan approaches to global distributive justice are premised on the idea that humans are the primary units of moral concern. In this paper, I argue that neither relational nor non-relational cosmopolitans can unquestioningly assume the moral primacy of humans. Furthermore, I argue that, by their own lights, cosmopolitans must extend the scope of justice to most, if not all, nonhuman animals. To demonstrate that cosmopolitans cannot sim…

  • Glass Panels and Peepholes

    Open Access•Angie Pepper•ARTICLE•Pacific philosophical quarterly•2020

    In this paper, I defend the claim that many sentient nonhuman animals have a right to privacy. I begin by outlining the view that the human right to privacy protects our interest in shaping different kinds of relationships with one another by giving us control over how we present ourselves to others. I then draw on empirical research to show that nonhuman animals also have this interest, which grounds a right to privacy against us. I further argu…

  • Interspecies justice

    Open Access•Richard Healey, Angie Pepper•ARTICLE•Philosophical Studies•2021

  • Political Agency in Humans and Other Animals

    Open Access•Angie Pepper•ARTICLE•Contemporary Political Theory•2021•Cited by: 5•References: 32

  • Letting Beings Be

    Open Access•Angie Pepper•ARTICLE•Humanimalia•2024

    Review of: Gary Steiner, What We Owe to Nonhuman Animals: The Historical Pretensions of Reason and The Ideal of Felt Kinship. Routledge Human–Animal Studies Series. London: Routledge, 2024. x + 269 pp. £36.99 (pb), £135.00 (hb

Sociology (6 works) · Epistemology (5 works) · Law (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Political science (5 works) · Economic Justice (3 works) · Environmental ethics (3 works) · Law and economics (3 works) · Political Philosophy and Ethics (3 works) · Politics (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae