Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Nir Eisikovits

Datos Biográficos

ID4163683
NOMBRENir Eisikovits
NOMBRESNir
APELLIDOEisikovits
FIRMAEISIKOVITS N
AFILIACIONESSuffolk University
ORCID0000-0002-8521-2576
VERIFICADOSí
TOTAL DE OBRAS7
TOTAL DE CITAS2
TOTAL COMO AUTOR7
TOTAL COMO EDITOR0
PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN2004
AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN2023
ÍNDICE H1
  • How to End a War

    Open Access•Mark A Wilson, Cheyney Ryan et al.•BOOK•How to End a War•2023

    How and when should we end a war? What place should the pathways to a war's end have in war planning and decision-making? This volume treats the topic of ending war as part and parcel of how wars begin and how they are fought – a unique, complex problem, worthy of its own conversation. New essays by leading thinkers and practitioners in the fields of philosophical ethics, international relations, and military law reflect on the problem and show t…

  • Not set in stone

    Nir Eisikovits•ARTICLE•Journal of Global Ethics•2020

    I examine five arguments against removing controversial monuments. I argue that none of these arguments provides good reasons for leaving controversial monuments in place. A close examination of these arguments also points to some of our misconceptions about the nature of monuments. The arguments include the claim that removing monuments rewrites history, that removal amounts to ex-post facto moralizing, that controversial monuments are needed to…

  • The non-ideal theory of conflict management

    Nir Eisikovits•ARTICLE•Journal of Global Ethics•2017•Citada por: 1

    This essay responds to criticisms of and reflections on A Theory of Truces offered by Keith Breen, David Lyons, Colleen Murphy and Thaddeus Metz. I focus on the place of truces within just war theory, the permissibility of making truces with particularly unsavory actors, the tension between present and future considerations in truce making, and Truce Thinking as an instance of non-ideal theory

  • Truces

    Open Access•Nir Eisikovits•ARTICLE•THEORIA An International Journal…•2015

    In previous work I developed an account of truces focused on 'truce thinking' – the moral and psychological commitments made by those who seek to manage and reduce conflict rather than permanently end it. In this article I further develop that theory by placing truce thinking in conceptual context and by exploring a case study. Part 1 rehearses the main features of truce thinking. Part 2 situates it against the related concepts of political recon…

  • Proportionality and Self-Interest

    Open Access•Nir Eisikovits•ARTICLE•Human Rights Review•2009•Referencias: 6

  • Theoria Referees

    Open Access•Bruce Ackerman, Richard Aldrich et al.•ARTICLE•THEORIA An International Journal…•2006

  • Forget Forgiveness

    Open Access•Nir Eisikovits•ARTICLE•THEORIA An International Journal…•2004•Citada por: 1

    The work of South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission has generated a great deal of interest in the role of forgiveness in politics. More specifically, it has raised the question of whether forgiveness should be a constitutive part of reconciliation processes between groups. In this paper, I argue that it should not, and that it might be both more useful and more realistic to consider something like Adam Smith’s notion of ‘sympathy’ inst…

  • The non-ideal theory of conflict management

    Nir Eisikovits•ARTICLE•Journal of Global Ethics•2017•Citada por: 1

    This essay responds to criticisms of and reflections on A Theory of Truces offered by Keith Breen, David Lyons, Colleen Murphy and Thaddeus Metz. I focus on the place of truces within just war theory, the permissibility of making truces with particularly unsavory actors, the tension between present and future considerations in truce making, and Truce Thinking as an instance of non-ideal theory

  • Forget Forgiveness

    Open Access•Nir Eisikovits•ARTICLE•THEORIA An International Journal…•2004•Citada por: 1

    The work of South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission has generated a great deal of interest in the role of forgiveness in politics. More specifically, it has raised the question of whether forgiveness should be a constitutive part of reconciliation processes between groups. In this paper, I argue that it should not, and that it might be both more useful and more realistic to consider something like Adam Smith’s notion of ‘sympathy’ inst…

  • Forget Forgiveness

    Open Access•Nir Eisikovits•ARTICLE•THEORIA An International Journal…•2004•Citada por: 1

    The work of South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission has generated a great deal of interest in the role of forgiveness in politics. More specifically, it has raised the question of whether forgiveness should be a constitutive part of reconciliation processes between groups. In this paper, I argue that it should not, and that it might be both more useful and more realistic to consider something like Adam Smith’s notion of ‘sympathy’ inst…

  • Theoria Referees

    Open Access•Bruce Ackerman, Richard Aldrich et al.•ARTICLE•THEORIA An International Journal…•2006

  • Proportionality and Self-Interest

    Open Access•Nir Eisikovits•ARTICLE•Human Rights Review•2009•Referencias: 6

  • Truces

    Open Access•Nir Eisikovits•ARTICLE•THEORIA An International Journal…•2015

    In previous work I developed an account of truces focused on 'truce thinking' – the moral and psychological commitments made by those who seek to manage and reduce conflict rather than permanently end it. In this article I further develop that theory by placing truce thinking in conceptual context and by exploring a case study. Part 1 rehearses the main features of truce thinking. Part 2 situates it against the related concepts of political recon…

  • The non-ideal theory of conflict management

    Nir Eisikovits•ARTICLE•Journal of Global Ethics•2017•Citada por: 1

    This essay responds to criticisms of and reflections on A Theory of Truces offered by Keith Breen, David Lyons, Colleen Murphy and Thaddeus Metz. I focus on the place of truces within just war theory, the permissibility of making truces with particularly unsavory actors, the tension between present and future considerations in truce making, and Truce Thinking as an instance of non-ideal theory

  • Not set in stone

    Nir Eisikovits•ARTICLE•Journal of Global Ethics•2020

    I examine five arguments against removing controversial monuments. I argue that none of these arguments provides good reasons for leaving controversial monuments in place. A close examination of these arguments also points to some of our misconceptions about the nature of monuments. The arguments include the claim that removing monuments rewrites history, that removal amounts to ex-post facto moralizing, that controversial monuments are needed to…

  • How to End a War

    Open Access•Mark A Wilson, Cheyney Ryan et al.•BOOK•How to End a War•2023

    How and when should we end a war? What place should the pathways to a war's end have in war planning and decision-making? This volume treats the topic of ending war as part and parcel of how wars begin and how they are fought – a unique, complex problem, worthy of its own conversation. New essays by leading thinkers and practitioners in the fields of philosophical ethics, international relations, and military law reflect on the problem and show t…

Sociology (6 obras) · Law (5 obras) · Political science (5 obras) · Law (4 obras) · Psychology (4 obras) · War, Ethics, and Justification (4 obras) · Epistemology (3 obras) · Global Peace and Security Dynamics (3 obras) · History (3 obras) · History (3 obras)

Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae