Joris Graff
Biographic Data
| ID | 4163699 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Joris Graff |
| GIVEN NAMES | Joris |
| FAMILY NAME | Graff |
| SIGNATURE | GRAFF J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Utrecht University |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-5946-2056 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 0 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 2 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2022 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 0 |
Moral sensitivity and the limits of artificial moral agents
Machine ethics is the field that strives to develop ‘artificial moral agents’ (AMAs), artificial systems that can autonomously make moral decisions. Some authors have questioned the feasibility of machine ethics, by questioning whether artificial systems can possess moral competence, or the capacity to reach morally right decisions in various situations. This paper explores this question by drawing on the work of several moral philosophers (McDow…
Debating as a Deliberative Instrument in Educational Practice
In recent decades, deliberation about public issues has become a central theme in citizenship education. In line with an increasing philosophical and political appreciation of the importance of deliberation within democracy, schools, as training grounds for democratic citizenship, should foster high-level deliberative skills. However, when this insight is translated into practical formats, these formats suffer from a number of shortcomings. Speci…
No prominent works on this page.
Debating as a Deliberative Instrument in Educational Practice
In recent decades, deliberation about public issues has become a central theme in citizenship education. In line with an increasing philosophical and political appreciation of the importance of deliberation within democracy, schools, as training grounds for democratic citizenship, should foster high-level deliberative skills. However, when this insight is translated into practical formats, these formats suffer from a number of shortcomings. Speci…
Moral sensitivity and the limits of artificial moral agents
Machine ethics is the field that strives to develop ‘artificial moral agents’ (AMAs), artificial systems that can autonomously make moral decisions. Some authors have questioned the feasibility of machine ethics, by questioning whether artificial systems can possess moral competence, or the capacity to reach morally right decisions in various situations. This paper explores this question by drawing on the work of several moral philosophers (McDow…
Sociology (2 works) · Citizenship (1 work) · Compromise (1 work) · Computer Science (1 work) · Deliberation (1 work) · Deliberative democracy (1 work) · Democracy (1 work) · Engineering (1 work) · Engineering ethics (1 work) · Epistemology (1 work)