Lars Lindblom
Biographic Data
| ID | 4163735 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Lars Lindblom |
| GIVEN NAMES | Lars |
| FAMILY NAME | Lindblom |
| SIGNATURE | LINDBLOM L |
| AFFILIATIONS | Linköping University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-9240-7400 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 9 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 9 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2007 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Justification of principles for healthcare priority setting
How should scarce healthcare resources be distributed? This is a contentious issue that became especially pressing during the pandemic. It is often emphasised that studies exploring public views about this question provide valuable input to the issue of healthcare priority setting. While there has been a vast number of such studies it is rarely articulated, more specifically, what the results from these studies would mean for the justification of…
Parental Imprisonment and Children's Right Not to be Separated from Their Parents
It is widely known that criminal punishment, especially imprisonment, has negative effects for innocent persons, most notably the families of prisoners. This is an issue attracting increasing attention from penal theorists and philosophers. Adding to this literature, this article examines the extent to which incarceration of a parent is consistent with fundamental rights that are often ascribed to children. In particular, we focus on children's r…
Justice and Exploitation in Cohen’s Account of Socialism
The Social Injustice of Parental Imprisonment
Children of prisoners are often negatively affected by their parents’ incarceration, which raises issues of justice. A common view is that the many negative effects associated with parental imprisonment are unjust, simply because children of prisoners are impermissibly harmed or unjustly punished by their parents’ incarceration. We argue that proposals of this kind have problems with accounting for cases where it is intuitive that prison might cr…
Childhood, education and distribuendum gaps
The state can act in ways that cause injustice between children, but the standard opportunity accounts of the distribuendum fail to explain how this can be the case. Such accounts have a problem of distribuendum gaps. First, they fail to identify the locus of injustice between children, as they must explain such injustice in terms of inequalities between adults. Second, they have an inability to identify cases of injustice where adulthood is not …
Goods, Principles, and Values in the Brighouse, Ladd, Loeb and Swift Framework for Educational Policy-Making
This article presents the promising framework for educational decision makers developed by Brighouse, Ladd, Loeb, and Swift (BLLS). The framework consists of an account of the educational goods, distributional principles and independent values at stake in education, and a method for making policy decisions on the basis of these and solid social science. I present three criticisms of this approach. The first says that the derivation of educational…
The Structure of a Rawlsian Theory of Just Work
Consent, contestability and employer authority
Cet article discute l’argument selon lequel l’autorité de l’employeur se légitime par le consentement des employés. Si l’analyse économique contemporaine des contrats de travail est correcte, alors nous devons, pour expliquer l’existence de contrats de travail, faire l’hypothèse que les parties qui le signent essaient de réduire leur incertitude ou leur ignorance en prévision de décisions à prendre. C’est pourquoi les parties sont d’accord pour s…
Dissolving the Moral Dilemma of Whistleblowing
Goods, Principles, and Values in the Brighouse, Ladd, Loeb and Swift Framework for Educational Policy-Making
This article presents the promising framework for educational decision makers developed by Brighouse, Ladd, Loeb, and Swift (BLLS). The framework consists of an account of the educational goods, distributional principles and independent values at stake in education, and a method for making policy decisions on the basis of these and solid social science. I present three criticisms of this approach. The first says that the derivation of educational…
Dissolving the Moral Dilemma of Whistleblowing
Consent, contestability and employer authority
Cet article discute l’argument selon lequel l’autorité de l’employeur se légitime par le consentement des employés. Si l’analyse économique contemporaine des contrats de travail est correcte, alors nous devons, pour expliquer l’existence de contrats de travail, faire l’hypothèse que les parties qui le signent essaient de réduire leur incertitude ou leur ignorance en prévision de décisions à prendre. C’est pourquoi les parties sont d’accord pour s…
The Structure of a Rawlsian Theory of Just Work
Goods, Principles, and Values in the Brighouse, Ladd, Loeb and Swift Framework for Educational Policy-Making
This article presents the promising framework for educational decision makers developed by Brighouse, Ladd, Loeb, and Swift (BLLS). The framework consists of an account of the educational goods, distributional principles and independent values at stake in education, and a method for making policy decisions on the basis of these and solid social science. I present three criticisms of this approach. The first says that the derivation of educational…
Childhood, education and distribuendum gaps
The state can act in ways that cause injustice between children, but the standard opportunity accounts of the distribuendum fail to explain how this can be the case. Such accounts have a problem of distribuendum gaps. First, they fail to identify the locus of injustice between children, as they must explain such injustice in terms of inequalities between adults. Second, they have an inability to identify cases of injustice where adulthood is not …
The Social Injustice of Parental Imprisonment
Children of prisoners are often negatively affected by their parents’ incarceration, which raises issues of justice. A common view is that the many negative effects associated with parental imprisonment are unjust, simply because children of prisoners are impermissibly harmed or unjustly punished by their parents’ incarceration. We argue that proposals of this kind have problems with accounting for cases where it is intuitive that prison might cr…
Justice and Exploitation in Cohen’s Account of Socialism
Justification of principles for healthcare priority setting
How should scarce healthcare resources be distributed? This is a contentious issue that became especially pressing during the pandemic. It is often emphasised that studies exploring public views about this question provide valuable input to the issue of healthcare priority setting. While there has been a vast number of such studies it is rarely articulated, more specifically, what the results from these studies would mean for the justification of…
Parental Imprisonment and Children's Right Not to be Separated from Their Parents
It is widely known that criminal punishment, especially imprisonment, has negative effects for innocent persons, most notably the families of prisoners. This is an issue attracting increasing attention from penal theorists and philosophers. Adding to this literature, this article examines the extent to which incarceration of a parent is consistent with fundamental rights that are often ascribed to children. In particular, we focus on children's r…
Political science (8 works) · Sociology (8 works) · Law (7 works) · Political Philosophy and Ethics (6 works) · Epistemology (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Economics (4 works) · Law and economics (4 works) · Positive economics (4 works) · Psychology (4 works)