Sarah Mould
Biographic Data
| ID | 4171554 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Sarah Mould |
| GIVEN NAMES | Sarah |
| FAMILY NAME | Mould |
| SIGNATURE | MOULD S |
| AFFILIATIONS | UniSA Justice & Society, University of South Australia, Australia |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-3246-0987 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 7 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 4 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 7 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2018 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Young people are citizens now! Reconceptualising youth engagement with Australian parliaments
Legislating for human security
Conventional approaches to legislating to protect individual rights in Australia have utilised the language and discourse of international human rights law, attracting both support and criticism from key political actors and commentators. In South Australia, where no human rights legislation exists, past efforts to generate sustained public and political support for the enactment of international human rights principles into legislation have been…
Scrutinising Covid-19 laws
Australia’s parliamentary model of rights protection depends in large part on the capacity of the federal Parliament to scrutinise the law-making activities of the Executive government. Emergency law-making undertaken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic has challenged the Australian Parliament’s capacity to provide meaningful scrutiny of proposed laws, particularly identifying and addressing the impact of emergency powers on the rights of indivi…
Who’s watching the ‘eyes’? Parliamentary scrutiny of national identity matching laws
Scrutiny of the federal government’s proposed new identity matching laws by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security has revealed new insights into both the rights intrusive nature of these laws, and the potential impact and influence of this Committee as a component of Australia’s exclusively parliamentary model of rights protection. This Brief contains a short description of the nature of the proposed identity-matching reg…
A deliberative approach to post legislative scrutiny? Lessons from Australia’s ad hoc approach
The elusive concept of post legislative scrutiny (PLS) is slowly starting to capture the attention of Westminster inspired Parliaments around the world with its promise of improving the implementation and quality of law making through systematic review, with benefits of the citizen on the ground. Assumptions are made within the idea of PLS about who should be responsible for the scrutiny (the Parliament) and how it should occur in practice (often…
Parliamentary Rights Scrutiny and Counter-Terrorism Lawmaking in Australia
This paper evaluates the impact of pre and post-enactment scrutiny of Australia’s counter-terrorism laws enacted from 2001 until 2018. Parliamentary scrutiny of rights-engaging laws is particularly critical in the Australian content, as Australia relies on a parliamentary model of rights protection at the federal level. The evaluation framework employed in this Paper considers a range of evidence to provide a holistic account of the impact of leg…
The Role of Committees in Rights Protection in Federal and State Parliaments in Australia
This article offers a snapshot of how Australian parliamentary committees scrutinise Bills for their rights-compliance in circumstances where the political stakes are high and the rights impacts strong. It tests the assumption that parliamentary models of rights protection are inherently flawed when it comes to Bills directed at electorally unpopular groups such as bikies and terrorists by analysing how parliamentary committees have scrutinised r…
Scrutinising Covid-19 laws
Australia’s parliamentary model of rights protection depends in large part on the capacity of the federal Parliament to scrutinise the law-making activities of the Executive government. Emergency law-making undertaken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic has challenged the Australian Parliament’s capacity to provide meaningful scrutiny of proposed laws, particularly identifying and addressing the impact of emergency powers on the rights of indivi…
A deliberative approach to post legislative scrutiny? Lessons from Australia’s ad hoc approach
The elusive concept of post legislative scrutiny (PLS) is slowly starting to capture the attention of Westminster inspired Parliaments around the world with its promise of improving the implementation and quality of law making through systematic review, with benefits of the citizen on the ground. Assumptions are made within the idea of PLS about who should be responsible for the scrutiny (the Parliament) and how it should occur in practice (often…
The Role of Committees in Rights Protection in Federal and State Parliaments in Australia
This article offers a snapshot of how Australian parliamentary committees scrutinise Bills for their rights-compliance in circumstances where the political stakes are high and the rights impacts strong. It tests the assumption that parliamentary models of rights protection are inherently flawed when it comes to Bills directed at electorally unpopular groups such as bikies and terrorists by analysing how parliamentary committees have scrutinised r…
The Role of Committees in Rights Protection in Federal and State Parliaments in Australia
This article offers a snapshot of how Australian parliamentary committees scrutinise Bills for their rights-compliance in circumstances where the political stakes are high and the rights impacts strong. It tests the assumption that parliamentary models of rights protection are inherently flawed when it comes to Bills directed at electorally unpopular groups such as bikies and terrorists by analysing how parliamentary committees have scrutinised r…
Parliamentary Rights Scrutiny and Counter-Terrorism Lawmaking in Australia
This paper evaluates the impact of pre and post-enactment scrutiny of Australia’s counter-terrorism laws enacted from 2001 until 2018. Parliamentary scrutiny of rights-engaging laws is particularly critical in the Australian content, as Australia relies on a parliamentary model of rights protection at the federal level. The evaluation framework employed in this Paper considers a range of evidence to provide a holistic account of the impact of leg…
Scrutinising Covid-19 laws
Australia’s parliamentary model of rights protection depends in large part on the capacity of the federal Parliament to scrutinise the law-making activities of the Executive government. Emergency law-making undertaken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic has challenged the Australian Parliament’s capacity to provide meaningful scrutiny of proposed laws, particularly identifying and addressing the impact of emergency powers on the rights of indivi…
Who’s watching the ‘eyes’? Parliamentary scrutiny of national identity matching laws
Scrutiny of the federal government’s proposed new identity matching laws by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security has revealed new insights into both the rights intrusive nature of these laws, and the potential impact and influence of this Committee as a component of Australia’s exclusively parliamentary model of rights protection. This Brief contains a short description of the nature of the proposed identity-matching reg…
A deliberative approach to post legislative scrutiny? Lessons from Australia’s ad hoc approach
The elusive concept of post legislative scrutiny (PLS) is slowly starting to capture the attention of Westminster inspired Parliaments around the world with its promise of improving the implementation and quality of law making through systematic review, with benefits of the citizen on the ground. Assumptions are made within the idea of PLS about who should be responsible for the scrutiny (the Parliament) and how it should occur in practice (often…
Legislating for human security
Conventional approaches to legislating to protect individual rights in Australia have utilised the language and discourse of international human rights law, attracting both support and criticism from key political actors and commentators. In South Australia, where no human rights legislation exists, past efforts to generate sustained public and political support for the enactment of international human rights principles into legislation have been…
Young people are citizens now! Reconceptualising youth engagement with Australian parliaments
Law (6 works) · Political science (6 works) · Law (5 works) · Scrutiny (5 works) · Politics (4 works) · Public Administration (4 works) · Law and economics (3 works) · Legislature (3 works) · Ombudsman and Human Rights (3 works) · Project commissioning (3 works)