Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Holly Brasher

Biographic Data

ID4179917
NAMEHolly Brasher
GIVEN NAMESHolly
FAMILY NAMEBrasher
SIGNATUREBRASHER H
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS9
TOTAL CITATIONS113
AUTHOR COUNT9
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1999
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2013
H-INDEX5
  • Policy agendas and births and deaths of political parties

    Open Access•David Lowery, A Van Witteloostuijn et al.•ARTICLE•Party Politics•2013•Cited by: 22•References: 41

    The standard model of political party density emphasizing the interaction of social cleavages and district magnitude (M) is incomplete in accounting for number of parties in cases of high values of M in an arbitrary way. We explore an alternative model for such cases emphasizing the slack in the issue agenda available to parties with which to construct viable identities or niches they can employ to mobilize cognitively-limited voters. The model i…

  • Ps: Political Science and Politics Reviewers, 2011

    Open Access•Regina Abrami, Gary Ackerman et al.•ARTICLE•PS Political Science & Politics•2012•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    In 2011, PS: Political Science and Politics published articles covering a vast range of topics. The journal's commitment to publishing articles on pedagogy and the profession, as well as exemplary topical scholarship on a spectrum of issues, call for an equally broad stable of reviewers. PS cannot publish such diverse work without the outstanding work (and openmindedness) of our peer reviewers. The peer-review process relies on the professionalis…

  • Unpacking LogM: Toward a More General Theory of Party System Density

    Open Access•David Lowery, Simon Otje et al.•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•2010•Cited by: 22•References: 51

    The standard model of political party system density combines two traditions to explain why some countries have more political parties than others, one tradition that emphasizes social cleavages and another that emphasizes electoral institutions, especially district magnitude. Despite its considerable success, there are several reasons to be less than fully satisfied with the standard model. We examine two of these problems associated with the sc…

  • Analyzing the U.S. Senate in 2003: Similarities, Clusters, and Blocs

    Open Access•Aleks Jakulin, Wray Buntine et al.•ARTICLE•Political Analysis•2009•Cited by: 2•References: 9

    In this paper, we apply information theoretic measures to voting in the U.S. Senate in 2003. We assess the associations between pairs of senators and groups of senators based on the votes they cast. For pairs, we use similarity-based methods, including hierarchical clustering and multidimensional scaling. To identify groups of senators, we use principal component analysis. We also apply a discrete multinomial latent variable model that we have de…

  • The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform – By Marty Cohen, David Karol, Hans Noel, and John Zaller

    Open Access•Holly Brasher•ARTICLE•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2009

  • The Dynamic Character of Political Party Evaluations

    Open Access•Holly Brasher•ARTICLE•Party Politics•2009•Cited by: 21•References: 35

    Over the past 50 years, the American public has consistently been asked to compare the two major parties' ability to handle a variety of issues. The meaning of their answers is an under-studied phenomenon. In this article, I explore changes in comparative party evaluations over time and the source of those changes in attitudes towards the parties. Previous research is based on the assumption that the parties have enduring associations with partic…

  • Listening to Hearings: Legislative Hearings and Legislative Outcomes

    Open Access•Holly Brasher•ARTICLE•American Politics Research•2006•Cited by: 4•References: 28

    In this study, I consider the role of legislative hearings in the legislative process. Previous studies of legislative outcomes often omit a discussion of hearings or do not incorporate hearings in a systematic way. One obvious purpose that hearings might serve is to provide the information and expertise necessary to solve any problems with the legislation, and once acquired, this information would allow the bill to move forward. I challenge the …

  • Capitalizing on Contention: Issue Agendas in U.S. Senate Campaigns

    Holly Brasher•ARTICLE•Political Communication•2003•Cited by: 11•References: 11

    This abstract addresses the divergent views that political scientists and members of Congress have about the role of issues in congressional campaigns. The scholarly perspective is based on the assumption that issues and policy are relatively unimportant in the relationship between members and their constituents. In contrast, the political parties in Congress devote a substantial amount of time and attention to developing an effective issue agend…

  • State Lobby Registration Data: The Anomalous Case of Florida (And Minnesota Too)

    Open Access•Holly Brasher, David Lowery et al.•ARTICLE•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1999•Cited by: 30•References: 2

    Florida's lobbying community was anomalously large in 1990, a problem that threatens to undermine more general interpretations of the density of state interest systems. We use time series and cross-sectional data to better understand just what happened in Florida. Two explanations are examined, one focusing on changes in lobbying regulations, and the other based on a population ecology interpretation of Florida's battle over the sales tax on serv…

  • State Lobby Registration Data: The Anomalous Case of Florida (And Minnesota Too)

    Open Access•Holly Brasher, David Lowery et al.•ARTICLE•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1999•Cited by: 30•References: 2

    Florida's lobbying community was anomalously large in 1990, a problem that threatens to undermine more general interpretations of the density of state interest systems. We use time series and cross-sectional data to better understand just what happened in Florida. Two explanations are examined, one focusing on changes in lobbying regulations, and the other based on a population ecology interpretation of Florida's battle over the sales tax on serv…

  • Policy agendas and births and deaths of political parties

    Open Access•David Lowery, A Van Witteloostuijn et al.•ARTICLE•Party Politics•2013•Cited by: 22•References: 41

    The standard model of political party density emphasizing the interaction of social cleavages and district magnitude (M) is incomplete in accounting for number of parties in cases of high values of M in an arbitrary way. We explore an alternative model for such cases emphasizing the slack in the issue agenda available to parties with which to construct viable identities or niches they can employ to mobilize cognitively-limited voters. The model i…

  • Unpacking LogM: Toward a More General Theory of Party System Density

    Open Access•David Lowery, Simon Otje et al.•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•2010•Cited by: 22•References: 51

    The standard model of political party system density combines two traditions to explain why some countries have more political parties than others, one tradition that emphasizes social cleavages and another that emphasizes electoral institutions, especially district magnitude. Despite its considerable success, there are several reasons to be less than fully satisfied with the standard model. We examine two of these problems associated with the sc…

  • The Dynamic Character of Political Party Evaluations

    Open Access•Holly Brasher•ARTICLE•Party Politics•2009•Cited by: 21•References: 35

    Over the past 50 years, the American public has consistently been asked to compare the two major parties' ability to handle a variety of issues. The meaning of their answers is an under-studied phenomenon. In this article, I explore changes in comparative party evaluations over time and the source of those changes in attitudes towards the parties. Previous research is based on the assumption that the parties have enduring associations with partic…

  • Capitalizing on Contention: Issue Agendas in U.S. Senate Campaigns

    Holly Brasher•ARTICLE•Political Communication•2003•Cited by: 11•References: 11

    This abstract addresses the divergent views that political scientists and members of Congress have about the role of issues in congressional campaigns. The scholarly perspective is based on the assumption that issues and policy are relatively unimportant in the relationship between members and their constituents. In contrast, the political parties in Congress devote a substantial amount of time and attention to developing an effective issue agend…

  • Listening to Hearings: Legislative Hearings and Legislative Outcomes

    Open Access•Holly Brasher•ARTICLE•American Politics Research•2006•Cited by: 4•References: 28

    In this study, I consider the role of legislative hearings in the legislative process. Previous studies of legislative outcomes often omit a discussion of hearings or do not incorporate hearings in a systematic way. One obvious purpose that hearings might serve is to provide the information and expertise necessary to solve any problems with the legislation, and once acquired, this information would allow the bill to move forward. I challenge the …

  • Analyzing the U.S. Senate in 2003: Similarities, Clusters, and Blocs

    Open Access•Aleks Jakulin, Wray Buntine et al.•ARTICLE•Political Analysis•2009•Cited by: 2•References: 9

    In this paper, we apply information theoretic measures to voting in the U.S. Senate in 2003. We assess the associations between pairs of senators and groups of senators based on the votes they cast. For pairs, we use similarity-based methods, including hierarchical clustering and multidimensional scaling. To identify groups of senators, we use principal component analysis. We also apply a discrete multinomial latent variable model that we have de…

  • Ps: Political Science and Politics Reviewers, 2011

    Open Access•Regina Abrami, Gary Ackerman et al.•ARTICLE•PS Political Science & Politics•2012•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    In 2011, PS: Political Science and Politics published articles covering a vast range of topics. The journal's commitment to publishing articles on pedagogy and the profession, as well as exemplary topical scholarship on a spectrum of issues, call for an equally broad stable of reviewers. PS cannot publish such diverse work without the outstanding work (and openmindedness) of our peer reviewers. The peer-review process relies on the professionalis…

  • State Lobby Registration Data: The Anomalous Case of Florida (And Minnesota Too)

    Open Access•Holly Brasher, David Lowery et al.•ARTICLE•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1999•Cited by: 30•References: 2

    Florida's lobbying community was anomalously large in 1990, a problem that threatens to undermine more general interpretations of the density of state interest systems. We use time series and cross-sectional data to better understand just what happened in Florida. Two explanations are examined, one focusing on changes in lobbying regulations, and the other based on a population ecology interpretation of Florida's battle over the sales tax on serv…

  • Capitalizing on Contention: Issue Agendas in U.S. Senate Campaigns

    Holly Brasher•ARTICLE•Political Communication•2003•Cited by: 11•References: 11

    This abstract addresses the divergent views that political scientists and members of Congress have about the role of issues in congressional campaigns. The scholarly perspective is based on the assumption that issues and policy are relatively unimportant in the relationship between members and their constituents. In contrast, the political parties in Congress devote a substantial amount of time and attention to developing an effective issue agend…

  • Listening to Hearings: Legislative Hearings and Legislative Outcomes

    Open Access•Holly Brasher•ARTICLE•American Politics Research•2006•Cited by: 4•References: 28

    In this study, I consider the role of legislative hearings in the legislative process. Previous studies of legislative outcomes often omit a discussion of hearings or do not incorporate hearings in a systematic way. One obvious purpose that hearings might serve is to provide the information and expertise necessary to solve any problems with the legislation, and once acquired, this information would allow the bill to move forward. I challenge the …

  • Analyzing the U.S. Senate in 2003: Similarities, Clusters, and Blocs

    Open Access•Aleks Jakulin, Wray Buntine et al.•ARTICLE•Political Analysis•2009•Cited by: 2•References: 9

    In this paper, we apply information theoretic measures to voting in the U.S. Senate in 2003. We assess the associations between pairs of senators and groups of senators based on the votes they cast. For pairs, we use similarity-based methods, including hierarchical clustering and multidimensional scaling. To identify groups of senators, we use principal component analysis. We also apply a discrete multinomial latent variable model that we have de…

  • The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform – By Marty Cohen, David Karol, Hans Noel, and John Zaller

    Open Access•Holly Brasher•ARTICLE•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2009

  • The Dynamic Character of Political Party Evaluations

    Open Access•Holly Brasher•ARTICLE•Party Politics•2009•Cited by: 21•References: 35

    Over the past 50 years, the American public has consistently been asked to compare the two major parties' ability to handle a variety of issues. The meaning of their answers is an under-studied phenomenon. In this article, I explore changes in comparative party evaluations over time and the source of those changes in attitudes towards the parties. Previous research is based on the assumption that the parties have enduring associations with partic…

  • Unpacking LogM: Toward a More General Theory of Party System Density

    Open Access•David Lowery, Simon Otje et al.•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•2010•Cited by: 22•References: 51

    The standard model of political party system density combines two traditions to explain why some countries have more political parties than others, one tradition that emphasizes social cleavages and another that emphasizes electoral institutions, especially district magnitude. Despite its considerable success, there are several reasons to be less than fully satisfied with the standard model. We examine two of these problems associated with the sc…

  • Ps: Political Science and Politics Reviewers, 2011

    Open Access•Regina Abrami, Gary Ackerman et al.•ARTICLE•PS Political Science & Politics•2012•Cited by: 1•References: 3

    In 2011, PS: Political Science and Politics published articles covering a vast range of topics. The journal's commitment to publishing articles on pedagogy and the profession, as well as exemplary topical scholarship on a spectrum of issues, call for an equally broad stable of reviewers. PS cannot publish such diverse work without the outstanding work (and openmindedness) of our peer reviewers. The peer-review process relies on the professionalis…

  • Policy agendas and births and deaths of political parties

    Open Access•David Lowery, A Van Witteloostuijn et al.•ARTICLE•Party Politics•2013•Cited by: 22•References: 41

    The standard model of political party density emphasizing the interaction of social cleavages and district magnitude (M) is incomplete in accounting for number of parties in cases of high values of M in an arbitrary way. We explore an alternative model for such cases emphasizing the slack in the issue agenda available to parties with which to construct viable identities or niches they can employ to mobilize cognitively-limited voters. The model i…

Political science (9 works) · Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 works) · Law (7 works) · Law (7 works) · Politics (7 works) · Computer Science (6 works) · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (6 works) · Sociology (5 works) · Public Administration (4 works) · Public Administration (3 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae