Troy E Smith
Biographic Data
| ID | 4194162 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Troy E Smith |
| GIVEN NAMES | Troy E |
| FAMILY NAME | Smith |
| SIGNATURE | SMITH T E |
| AFFILIATIONS | Brigham Young University–Hawaii |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-6057-0713 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 8 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2000 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2017 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
A Compound Republic—If You Can Keep It
This article examines Martha Derthick’s view of the American federal system as developed primarily in her book Keeping the Compound Republic, focusing on the system’s enduring features and evolution in the twentieth century and considering the value of the compound republic and what is necessary to sustain it. Derthick’s understanding of federalism, which was shaped in important ways by her mentor Edward C. Banfield, favors a pragmatic blending a…
Governing the American State
As the Civil War drew to a close, Senator Charles Sumner's attempt to “crush out the last lingering relics of the States’ Rights dogma” with the Raritan Railroad Bill was opposed by President Abraham Lincoln who saw it as an effort to “change this government from its original form, and [make] it a strong centralized power” (Burlingame 2000, 171). Former President James Madison had earlier opposed Senator Daniel Webster's efforts to define the Ame…
Responses to Rubin and Feeley
Journal Article Responses to Rubin and Feeley Get access Samuel H. Beer Samuel H. Beer **Harvard University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Volume 38, Issue 2, Spring 2008, Pages 192–210, https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjn005 Published: 11 February 2008
Divided Publius
Alexander Hamilton and James Madison agreed in the Federalist that the Constitution authorizes both political and judicial processes to define and safeguard the boundaries of federalism, but disagreed on public opinion's role in a republic and how to cultivate public sentiment for the Constitution. Hamilton preferred resolving intergovernmental disputes via political and public processes because public endorsement would legitimize broad national …
Presidential Power vs. Congressional Time
This study tests whether major policy shifts require several years of congressional deliberation before passage even during periods of crisis and disorganization in the minority political party. By examining the passage of major legislation during the Civil War, this study found that legislative history is a relevant and limiting factor in the passage of presidential and congressional agendas even during periods of crisis and disorganization in t…
Divided Publius
Alexander Hamilton and James Madison agreed in the Federalist that the Constitution authorizes both political and judicial processes to define and safeguard the boundaries of federalism, but disagreed on public opinion's role in a republic and how to cultivate public sentiment for the Constitution. Hamilton preferred resolving intergovernmental disputes via political and public processes because public endorsement would legitimize broad national …
Responses to Rubin and Feeley
Journal Article Responses to Rubin and Feeley Get access Samuel H. Beer Samuel H. Beer **Harvard University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Volume 38, Issue 2, Spring 2008, Pages 192–210, https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjn005 Published: 11 February 2008
Presidential Power vs. Congressional Time
This study tests whether major policy shifts require several years of congressional deliberation before passage even during periods of crisis and disorganization in the minority political party. By examining the passage of major legislation during the Civil War, this study found that legislative history is a relevant and limiting factor in the passage of presidential and congressional agendas even during periods of crisis and disorganization in t…
Governing the American State
As the Civil War drew to a close, Senator Charles Sumner's attempt to “crush out the last lingering relics of the States’ Rights dogma” with the Raritan Railroad Bill was opposed by President Abraham Lincoln who saw it as an effort to “change this government from its original form, and [make] it a strong centralized power” (Burlingame 2000, 171). Former President James Madison had earlier opposed Senator Daniel Webster's efforts to define the Ame…
Responses to Rubin and Feeley
Journal Article Responses to Rubin and Feeley Get access Samuel H. Beer Samuel H. Beer **Harvard University Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Volume 38, Issue 2, Spring 2008, Pages 192–210, https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjn005 Published: 11 February 2008
Divided Publius
Alexander Hamilton and James Madison agreed in the Federalist that the Constitution authorizes both political and judicial processes to define and safeguard the boundaries of federalism, but disagreed on public opinion's role in a republic and how to cultivate public sentiment for the Constitution. Hamilton preferred resolving intergovernmental disputes via political and public processes because public endorsement would legitimize broad national …
A Compound Republic—If You Can Keep It
This article examines Martha Derthick’s view of the American federal system as developed primarily in her book Keeping the Compound Republic, focusing on the system’s enduring features and evolution in the twentieth century and considering the value of the compound republic and what is necessary to sustain it. Derthick’s understanding of federalism, which was shaped in important ways by her mentor Edward C. Banfield, favors a pragmatic blending a…
American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Politics (4 works) · Public Administration (4 works) · Federalism (3 works) · Sociology (3 works) · Constitution (2 works) · Government (linguistics) (2 works) · Law (2 works)