Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Igor Hanzel

Biographic Data

ID4213337
NAMEIgor Hanzel
GIVEN NAMESIgor
FAMILY NAMEHanzel
SIGNATUREHANZEL I
AFFILIATIONSDepartment of Logic & Philosophy of Science Philosophical Faculty Comenius University Gondova 2 Bratislava, 818 01 Slovak Republic
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS1
WORKS AS AUTHOR6
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2006
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2018
H-INDEX1
  • Ilyenkov and language

    Open Access•Igor Hanzel•ARTICLE•Studies in East European Thought•2018•References: 2

  • The Inherent Type of Scienific Law, The Idealized Types of Scientific Law

    Igor Hanzel•CHAPTER•Idealization XIV•2016

  • Marx's Methods of Theory Construction

    Igor Hanzel•ARTICLE•International Critical Thought•2015•References: 3

    The paper reconstructs the conceptual methods used in the construction of volume 1 of Capital (Marx Citation1976a) as well as in the manuscripts of its books 2 and 3, published in section 2 of the MEGA (Marx/Engels Gesamtausgabe 2). Drawing on them it identifies the key components of the conceptual methods Marx employed in Capital. It starts with a delineation of the methodological implications of Hegel's (2010) Science of Logic for Marx. Next it…

  • Beyond Blumer and Symbolic Interactionism

    Open Access•Igor Hanzel•ARTICLE•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2011•References: 16

    The article analysis the views approaching quantitative and qualitative methods in social sciences as separable or irreconcilable. First, we characterize these views and show how they deal with this divide and how they view the aspects of the latter. Next, we identify the works of Herbert Blumer as the basis of that divide and subject them to an analysis. Finally, by means of categories like quantity, quality, and measure, we show that the qualit…

  • Mistranslations of “Schein” and “Erscheinung”

    Open Access•Igor Hanzel•ARTICLE•Science & Society•2010•Cited by: 1

    The argument of Marx's Capital , Volume I, chapter 1, has a complex structure, which can best be understood if three dimensions are distinguished: the epistemic, sociological, and politico-economic. Concerning the epistemic dimension, Marx's views are often misunderstood due to neglect of the differentiation between the categories appearance and manifestation , as can be seen in the works of C. J. Arthur and P. Murray. Ben Fowkes’ English transla…

  • Alfred Schütz and Edmund Husserl

    Igor Hanzel•ARTICLE•Human Affairs•2006

  • Mistranslations of “Schein” and “Erscheinung”

    Open Access•Igor Hanzel•ARTICLE•Science & Society•2010•Cited by: 1

    The argument of Marx's Capital , Volume I, chapter 1, has a complex structure, which can best be understood if three dimensions are distinguished: the epistemic, sociological, and politico-economic. Concerning the epistemic dimension, Marx's views are often misunderstood due to neglect of the differentiation between the categories appearance and manifestation , as can be seen in the works of C. J. Arthur and P. Murray. Ben Fowkes’ English transla…

  • Alfred Schütz and Edmund Husserl

    Igor Hanzel•ARTICLE•Human Affairs•2006

  • Mistranslations of “Schein” and “Erscheinung”

    Open Access•Igor Hanzel•ARTICLE•Science & Society•2010•Cited by: 1

    The argument of Marx's Capital , Volume I, chapter 1, has a complex structure, which can best be understood if three dimensions are distinguished: the epistemic, sociological, and politico-economic. Concerning the epistemic dimension, Marx's views are often misunderstood due to neglect of the differentiation between the categories appearance and manifestation , as can be seen in the works of C. J. Arthur and P. Murray. Ben Fowkes’ English transla…

  • Beyond Blumer and Symbolic Interactionism

    Open Access•Igor Hanzel•ARTICLE•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2011•References: 16

    The article analysis the views approaching quantitative and qualitative methods in social sciences as separable or irreconcilable. First, we characterize these views and show how they deal with this divide and how they view the aspects of the latter. Next, we identify the works of Herbert Blumer as the basis of that divide and subject them to an analysis. Finally, by means of categories like quantity, quality, and measure, we show that the qualit…

  • Marx's Methods of Theory Construction

    Igor Hanzel•ARTICLE•International Critical Thought•2015•References: 3

    The paper reconstructs the conceptual methods used in the construction of volume 1 of Capital (Marx Citation1976a) as well as in the manuscripts of its books 2 and 3, published in section 2 of the MEGA (Marx/Engels Gesamtausgabe 2). Drawing on them it identifies the key components of the conceptual methods Marx employed in Capital. It starts with a delineation of the methodological implications of Hegel's (2010) Science of Logic for Marx. Next it…

  • The Inherent Type of Scienific Law, The Idealized Types of Scientific Law

    Igor Hanzel•CHAPTER•Idealization XIV•2016

  • Ilyenkov and language

    Open Access•Igor Hanzel•ARTICLE•Studies in East European Thought•2018•References: 2

Epistemology (5 works) · Philosophy (5 works) · Sociology (5 works) · Computer Science (3 works) · Critical Theory and Philosophy (3 works) · Hegelianism (3 works) · History (3 works) · Philosophy (3 works) · Capital (architecture (2 works) · Economics (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae