Lidwine B Mokkink
Datos Biográficos
| ID | 4219015 |
|---|---|
| NOMBRE | Lidwine B Mokkink |
| NOMBRES | Lidwine B |
| APELLIDO | Mokkink |
| FIRMA | MOKKINK L B |
| AFILIACIONES | Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-6489-2827 |
| VERIFICADO | Sí |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 16 |
| TOTAL DE CITAS | 28 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 16 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMER AÑO DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2010 |
| AÑO MÁS RECIENTE DE PUBLICACIÓN | 2025 |
| ÍNDICE H | 1 |
Cosmin reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient‐reported outcome measures
Explanation & Elaboration document of the Cosmin Reporting Guideline 2.0 for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures
Systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
Templates complementing the PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024 reporting guidance can be used to standardize and enhance the clarity and usefulness of OMI systematic reviews focusing on PROMs. They comprise a comprehensive set of tools to effectively report OMI systematic reviews, in service of end-users who are selecting OMIs
Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs)
PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024 consists of two checklists (full reports; abstracts), their corresponding explanation and elaboration documents detailing the rationale and examples for each item, and a data flow diagram. PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024 can improve the reporting of systematic reviews of OMIs, fostering their reproducibility and allowing end-users to appraise the quality of OMIs and select the most appropriate OMI for a specific applicatio…
Cosmin guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0
The quality of systematic reviews of PROMs can be improved by using this updated version of the COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of PROMs. Improved quality will lead to better PROM selection and increased standardization of PROM use
Important Topics for Fostering Research Integrity by Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations
To foster research integrity (RI), it is necessary to address the institutional and system-of-science factors that influence researchers’ behavior. Consequently, research performing and research funding organizations (RPOs and RFOs) could develop comprehensive RI policies outlining the concrete steps they will take to foster RI. So far, there is no consensus on which topics are important to address in RI policies. Therefore, we conducted a three …
Cosmin reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures
Preregistering Qualitative Research
Preregistrations-records made a priori about study designs and analysis plans and placed in open repositories-are thought to strengthen the credibility and transparency of research. Different authors have put forth arguments in favor of introducing this practice in qualitative research and made suggestions for what to include in a qualitative preregistration form. The goal of this study was to gauge and understand what parts of preregistration te…
Cosmin guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures
The COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of PROMs includes methodology to combine the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties with the quality of the PROM itself (i.e., its measurement properties). This enables reviewers to draw transparent conclusions and making evidence-based recommendations on the quality of PROMs, and supports the evidence-based selection of PROMs for use in research and in clinical practice
Cosmin Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
The COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist was developed exclusively for use in systematic reviews of PROMs to distinguish this application from other purposes of assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties, such as guidance for designing or reporting a study on the measurement properties
Measurement properties of the Client-centered Care Questionnaire (CCCQ)
Validation of a Dutch version of the Neurological Fatigue Index (NFI-MS) for patients with multiple sclerosis in the Netherlands
Measurement in Medicine
The success of the Apgar score demonstrates the astounding power of an appropriate clinical instrument. This down-to-earth book provides practical advice, underpinned by theoretical principles, on developing and evaluating measurement instruments in all fields of medicine. It equips you to choose the most appropriate instrument for specific purposes. The book covers measurement theories, methods and criteria for evaluating and selecting instrumen…
Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties
Based on experience in testing this scoring system on 46 articles, the COSMIN checklist with the proposed scoring system seems to be a useful tool for assessing the methodological quality of studies included in systematic reviews of measurement properties
The Cosmin study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes
The Cosmin checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments
The resulting COSMIN checklist could be useful when selecting a measurement instrument, peer-reviewing a manuscript, designing or reporting a study on measurement properties, or for educational purposes
Preregistering Qualitative Research
Preregistrations-records made a priori about study designs and analysis plans and placed in open repositories-are thought to strengthen the credibility and transparency of research. Different authors have put forth arguments in favor of introducing this practice in qualitative research and made suggestions for what to include in a qualitative preregistration form. The goal of this study was to gauge and understand what parts of preregistration te…
The Cosmin study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes
The Cosmin checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments
The resulting COSMIN checklist could be useful when selecting a measurement instrument, peer-reviewing a manuscript, designing or reporting a study on measurement properties, or for educational purposes
Measurement in Medicine
The success of the Apgar score demonstrates the astounding power of an appropriate clinical instrument. This down-to-earth book provides practical advice, underpinned by theoretical principles, on developing and evaluating measurement instruments in all fields of medicine. It equips you to choose the most appropriate instrument for specific purposes. The book covers measurement theories, methods and criteria for evaluating and selecting instrumen…
Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties
Based on experience in testing this scoring system on 46 articles, the COSMIN checklist with the proposed scoring system seems to be a useful tool for assessing the methodological quality of studies included in systematic reviews of measurement properties
Validation of a Dutch version of the Neurological Fatigue Index (NFI-MS) for patients with multiple sclerosis in the Netherlands
Measurement properties of the Client-centered Care Questionnaire (CCCQ)
Cosmin Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
The COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist was developed exclusively for use in systematic reviews of PROMs to distinguish this application from other purposes of assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties, such as guidance for designing or reporting a study on the measurement properties
Cosmin guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures
The COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of PROMs includes methodology to combine the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties with the quality of the PROM itself (i.e., its measurement properties). This enables reviewers to draw transparent conclusions and making evidence-based recommendations on the quality of PROMs, and supports the evidence-based selection of PROMs for use in research and in clinical practice
Preregistering Qualitative Research
Preregistrations-records made a priori about study designs and analysis plans and placed in open repositories-are thought to strengthen the credibility and transparency of research. Different authors have put forth arguments in favor of introducing this practice in qualitative research and made suggestions for what to include in a qualitative preregistration form. The goal of this study was to gauge and understand what parts of preregistration te…
Important Topics for Fostering Research Integrity by Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations
To foster research integrity (RI), it is necessary to address the institutional and system-of-science factors that influence researchers’ behavior. Consequently, research performing and research funding organizations (RPOs and RFOs) could develop comprehensive RI policies outlining the concrete steps they will take to foster RI. So far, there is no consensus on which topics are important to address in RI policies. Therefore, we conducted a three …
Cosmin reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures
Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs)
PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024 consists of two checklists (full reports; abstracts), their corresponding explanation and elaboration documents detailing the rationale and examples for each item, and a data flow diagram. PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024 can improve the reporting of systematic reviews of OMIs, fostering their reproducibility and allowing end-users to appraise the quality of OMIs and select the most appropriate OMI for a specific applicatio…
Cosmin guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0
The quality of systematic reviews of PROMs can be improved by using this updated version of the COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of PROMs. Improved quality will lead to better PROM selection and increased standardization of PROM use
Cosmin reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient‐reported outcome measures
Explanation & Elaboration document of the Cosmin Reporting Guideline 2.0 for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures
Systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)
Templates complementing the PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024 reporting guidance can be used to standardize and enhance the clarity and usefulness of OMI systematic reviews focusing on PROMs. They comprise a comprehensive set of tools to effectively report OMI systematic reviews, in service of end-users who are selecting OMIs
Medicine (13 obras) · Psychology (13 obras) · Computer Science (11 obras) · Delphi Technique in Research (11 obras) · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (10 obras) · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (8 obras) · Delphi method (6 obras) · Guideline (6 obras) · MEDLINE (6 obras) · Pathology (6 obras)