Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Stephanie R Mallina

Biographic Data

ID4231791
NAMEStephanie R Mallina
GIVEN NAMESStephanie R
FAMILY NAMEMallina
SIGNATUREMALLINA S R
AFFILIATIONSEckerd College
ORCID0000-0003-3257-6402
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS6
TOTAL CITATIONS18
WORKS AS AUTHOR6
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2016
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2022
H-INDEX2
  • Changes in nonprejudiced motivations track shifts in the U.S. sociopolitical climate

    Open Access•Douglas L Kievit, Jennifer Lacosse et al.•ARTICLE•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2022•Cited by: 2•References: 11

    Recently, major societal events have shaped perceptions of race relations in the US. The current work argues that people’s motivations to be nonprejudiced toward Black people have changed in concert with these broader societal forces. Analyses of two independent archival datasets reveal that nonprejudiced motivations changed predictably in accordance with shifts in the social milieu over the last 15 years. In one dataset ( N = 13,395), we track m…

  • Abandon Ship or Stay on Board

    Stephanie R Mallina, E Ashby Plant et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychology•2021•References: 9

    How do people respond when their group’s power is threatened? Four studies suggest that threats to group power lead people to adhere to and invest in their group. When a personally important group’s power was threatened, people psychologically adhered to the group (Studies 1a and 1b). This adherence occurred among people who were high (but not low) in group identification (Study 2). Adherence to the group was associated with behaviors aimed at pr…

  • If You Don’t Believe in God, Do You at Least Believe in Aristotle? Evaluations of Religious Outgroup Members Hinge upon Moral Perceptions

    Stephanie R Mallina, Paul Conway•ARTICLE•International Journal for the…•2021•References: 14

    Religious people tend to believe atheists are immoral. Although some work suggests that atheists themselves agree, such findings could also reflect symmetric ingroup bias in the moral domain, where atheists likewise view religious targets as untrustworthy and immoral. We examined how American religious and atheist participants rated the morality of atheist and religious targets and assessed a potential intervention: learning that targets adhere t…

  • Subcomponents of Right-Wing Authoritarianism Differentially Predict Attitudes Toward Obeying Authorities

    Open Access•Stephanie R Mallina, Jarret T Crawford et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychological and…•2020

    Previous theory and research has suggested that right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) is a unitary construct related to attitudes regarding obedience to authority. Recently, scholars have suggested that RWA is multidimensional. To adjudicate these competing notions, we test whether the associations between RWA components and moral attitudes regarding obedience differ depending on the ideology of the authority. Across three studies and an integrative …

  • Political opposites do not attract

    Open Access•Stephanie R Mallina, Jarret T Crawford et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Social and Political…•2018•Cited by: 4•References: 17

    Past research shows that people like others who are similar to themselves, and that political partisans tend to dislike those with opposing viewpoints. Two studies examined how initial person impressions changed after discovering that the target held similar or dissimilar political beliefs. Using potential mates as targets, we found that participants liked targets less, were less romantically interested in targets, and rated targets as less attra…

  • Right-wing authoritarianism predicts prejudice equally toward “gay men and lesbians” and “homosexuals

    Jarret T Crawford, Mark J Brandt et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2016•Cited by: 12

    Two recent experiments found evidence for what we term the social category label (SCL) effect-that the relationship between right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and prejudice against gay men and lesbians can be reduced or even eliminated when the target group is labeled "gay men and lesbians" rather than "homosexuals" (Rios, 2013). Although this appears a promising approach to reduce self-reported sexual prejudice, with both theoretical implications…

  • Right-wing authoritarianism predicts prejudice equally toward “gay men and lesbians” and “homosexuals

    Jarret T Crawford, Mark J Brandt et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2016•Cited by: 12

    Two recent experiments found evidence for what we term the social category label (SCL) effect-that the relationship between right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and prejudice against gay men and lesbians can be reduced or even eliminated when the target group is labeled "gay men and lesbians" rather than "homosexuals" (Rios, 2013). Although this appears a promising approach to reduce self-reported sexual prejudice, with both theoretical implications…

  • Political opposites do not attract

    Open Access•Stephanie R Mallina, Jarret T Crawford et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Social and Political…•2018•Cited by: 4•References: 17

    Past research shows that people like others who are similar to themselves, and that political partisans tend to dislike those with opposing viewpoints. Two studies examined how initial person impressions changed after discovering that the target held similar or dissimilar political beliefs. Using potential mates as targets, we found that participants liked targets less, were less romantically interested in targets, and rated targets as less attra…

  • Changes in nonprejudiced motivations track shifts in the U.S. sociopolitical climate

    Open Access•Douglas L Kievit, Jennifer Lacosse et al.•ARTICLE•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2022•Cited by: 2•References: 11

    Recently, major societal events have shaped perceptions of race relations in the US. The current work argues that people’s motivations to be nonprejudiced toward Black people have changed in concert with these broader societal forces. Analyses of two independent archival datasets reveal that nonprejudiced motivations changed predictably in accordance with shifts in the social milieu over the last 15 years. In one dataset ( N = 13,395), we track m…

  • Right-wing authoritarianism predicts prejudice equally toward “gay men and lesbians” and “homosexuals

    Jarret T Crawford, Mark J Brandt et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Personality and Social…•2016•Cited by: 12

    Two recent experiments found evidence for what we term the social category label (SCL) effect-that the relationship between right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) and prejudice against gay men and lesbians can be reduced or even eliminated when the target group is labeled "gay men and lesbians" rather than "homosexuals" (Rios, 2013). Although this appears a promising approach to reduce self-reported sexual prejudice, with both theoretical implications…

  • Political opposites do not attract

    Open Access•Stephanie R Mallina, Jarret T Crawford et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Social and Political…•2018•Cited by: 4•References: 17

    Past research shows that people like others who are similar to themselves, and that political partisans tend to dislike those with opposing viewpoints. Two studies examined how initial person impressions changed after discovering that the target held similar or dissimilar political beliefs. Using potential mates as targets, we found that participants liked targets less, were less romantically interested in targets, and rated targets as less attra…

  • Subcomponents of Right-Wing Authoritarianism Differentially Predict Attitudes Toward Obeying Authorities

    Open Access•Stephanie R Mallina, Jarret T Crawford et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychological and…•2020

    Previous theory and research has suggested that right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) is a unitary construct related to attitudes regarding obedience to authority. Recently, scholars have suggested that RWA is multidimensional. To adjudicate these competing notions, we test whether the associations between RWA components and moral attitudes regarding obedience differ depending on the ideology of the authority. Across three studies and an integrative …

  • Abandon Ship or Stay on Board

    Stephanie R Mallina, E Ashby Plant et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychology•2021•References: 9

    How do people respond when their group’s power is threatened? Four studies suggest that threats to group power lead people to adhere to and invest in their group. When a personally important group’s power was threatened, people psychologically adhered to the group (Studies 1a and 1b). This adherence occurred among people who were high (but not low) in group identification (Study 2). Adherence to the group was associated with behaviors aimed at pr…

  • If You Don’t Believe in God, Do You at Least Believe in Aristotle? Evaluations of Religious Outgroup Members Hinge upon Moral Perceptions

    Stephanie R Mallina, Paul Conway•ARTICLE•International Journal for the…•2021•References: 14

    Religious people tend to believe atheists are immoral. Although some work suggests that atheists themselves agree, such findings could also reflect symmetric ingroup bias in the moral domain, where atheists likewise view religious targets as untrustworthy and immoral. We examined how American religious and atheist participants rated the morality of atheist and religious targets and assessed a potential intervention: learning that targets adhere t…

  • Changes in nonprejudiced motivations track shifts in the U.S. sociopolitical climate

    Open Access•Douglas L Kievit, Jennifer Lacosse et al.•ARTICLE•Group Processes & Intergroup…•2022•Cited by: 2•References: 11

    Recently, major societal events have shaped perceptions of race relations in the US. The current work argues that people’s motivations to be nonprejudiced toward Black people have changed in concert with these broader societal forces. Analyses of two independent archival datasets reveal that nonprejudiced motivations changed predictably in accordance with shifts in the social milieu over the last 15 years. In one dataset ( N = 13,395), we track m…

Psychology (6 works) · Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 works) · Cultural Differences and Values (5 works) · Social Psychology (5 works) · Politics (4 works) · Social Psychology (4 works) · Perception (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 works) · Authoritarianism (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae