Stephen Latour
Biographic Data
| ID | 4232756 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Stephen Latour |
| GIVEN NAMES | Stephen |
| FAMILY NAME | Latour |
| SIGNATURE | LATOUR S |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 66 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1974 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1978 |
| H-INDEX | 4 |
Preference for modes of dispute resolution as a function of process and decision control
Determinations of participant and observer satisfaction with adversary and inquisitorial modes of adjudication
Some Determinants of Preference for Modes of Conflict Resolution
This experimental study manipulated presence or absence of temporal urgency, presence or absence of a judgmental standard, and the correspondence or noncorrespondence of outcomes among disputants in a factorial design to assess their effects on preferences for five dispute-resolution procedures arranged along a continuum of decreasing third-party intervention: autocratic decision-making, arbitration, a moot, mediation, and bargaining. Arbitration…
Procedural Justice as Fairness
Some Determinants of Preference for Modes of Conflict Resolution
This experimental study manipulated presence or absence of temporal urgency, presence or absence of a judgmental standard, and the correspondence or noncorrespondence of outcomes among disputants in a factorial design to assess their effects on preferences for five dispute-resolution procedures arranged along a continuum of decreasing third-party intervention: autocratic decision-making, arbitration, a moot, mediation, and bargaining. Arbitration…
Preference for modes of dispute resolution as a function of process and decision control
Determinations of participant and observer satisfaction with adversary and inquisitorial modes of adjudication
Procedural Justice as Fairness
Procedural Justice as Fairness
Some Determinants of Preference for Modes of Conflict Resolution
This experimental study manipulated presence or absence of temporal urgency, presence or absence of a judgmental standard, and the correspondence or noncorrespondence of outcomes among disputants in a factorial design to assess their effects on preferences for five dispute-resolution procedures arranged along a continuum of decreasing third-party intervention: autocratic decision-making, arbitration, a moot, mediation, and bargaining. Arbitration…
Preference for modes of dispute resolution as a function of process and decision control
Determinations of participant and observer satisfaction with adversary and inquisitorial modes of adjudication
Law (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Political science (4 works) · Psychology (4 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Economics (2 works) · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems (2 works) · Microeconomics (2 works) · Preference (2 works)