Christopher J Bryan
Biographic Data
| ID | 4232872 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Christopher J Bryan |
| GIVEN NAMES | Christopher J |
| FAMILY NAME | Bryan |
| SIGNATURE | BRYAN C J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; and |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 28 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 5 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2009 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2015 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Seeing the other side
Cheating at the end to avoid regret
How do people behave when they face a finite series of opportunities to cheat with little or no risk of detection? In 4 experiments and a small meta-analysis, we analyzed over 25,000 cheating opportunities faced by over 2,500 people. The results suggested that the odds of cheating are almost 3 times higher at the end of a series than earlier. Participants could cheat in 1 of 2 ways: They could lie about the outcome of a private coin flip to get a…
Motivating voter turnout by invoking the self
Three randomized experiments found that subtle linguistic cues have the power to increase voting and related behavior. The phrasing of survey items was varied to frame voting either as the enactment of a personal identity (e.g., “being a voter”) or as simply a behavior (e.g., “voting”). As predicted, the personal-identity phrasing significantly increased interest in registering to vote (experiment 1) and, in two statewide elections in the United …
Naïve realism and capturing the “wisdom of dyads”
Political mindset: Effects of schema priming on liberal-conservative political positions
Political mindset: Effects of schema priming on liberal-conservative political positions
Seeing the other side
Naïve realism and capturing the “wisdom of dyads”
Cheating at the end to avoid regret
How do people behave when they face a finite series of opportunities to cheat with little or no risk of detection? In 4 experiments and a small meta-analysis, we analyzed over 25,000 cheating opportunities faced by over 2,500 people. The results suggested that the odds of cheating are almost 3 times higher at the end of a series than earlier. Participants could cheat in 1 of 2 ways: They could lie about the outcome of a private coin flip to get a…
Political mindset: Effects of schema priming on liberal-conservative political positions
Motivating voter turnout by invoking the self
Three randomized experiments found that subtle linguistic cues have the power to increase voting and related behavior. The phrasing of survey items was varied to frame voting either as the enactment of a personal identity (e.g., “being a voter”) or as simply a behavior (e.g., “voting”). As predicted, the personal-identity phrasing significantly increased interest in registering to vote (experiment 1) and, in two statewide elections in the United …
Naïve realism and capturing the “wisdom of dyads”
Seeing the other side
Cheating at the end to avoid regret
How do people behave when they face a finite series of opportunities to cheat with little or no risk of detection? In 4 experiments and a small meta-analysis, we analyzed over 25,000 cheating opportunities faced by over 2,500 people. The results suggested that the odds of cheating are almost 3 times higher at the end of a series than earlier. Participants could cheat in 1 of 2 ways: They could lie about the outcome of a private coin flip to get a…
Psychology (5 works) · Social Psychology (5 works) · Cultural Differences and Values (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 works) · Social Psychology (3 works) · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Law (2 works)