Paige C Brazy
Dados Biográficos
| ID | 4235013 |
|---|---|
| NOME | Paige C Brazy |
| PRENOMES | Paige C |
| SOBRENOME | Brazy |
| ASSINATURA | BRAZY P C |
| AFILIAÇÕES | University of Wisconsin–Madison |
| VERIFICADO | Não |
| TOTAL DE OBRAS | 5 |
| TOTAL DE CITAÇÕES | 48 |
| TOTAL COMO AUTOR | 5 |
| TOTAL COMO EDITOR | 0 |
| PRIMEIRO ANO DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2003 |
| ANO MAIS RECENTE DE PUBLICAÇÃO | 2013 |
| ÍNDICE H | 4 |
When Gender Fits Self-Regulatory Preferences
Females are perceived to have less power than males. These differences in perceived power might render different self-regulatory strategies appropriate: Women should (as members of other low-power groups) care about security, whereas men should (as members of other high-power groups) strive for accomplishment. These regulatory implications of gender provide the basis for regulatory fit between individuals' gender and their regulatory focus. Highe…
Why some groups just feel better
The current research applied the regulatory fit hypothesis (E. T. Higgins, 2000) to the evaluation of groups, suggesting that individuals' group appraisal depends on how well the groups fit their regulatory needs. Specifically, it was predicted that higher power groups would fit and be more valued by those individuals with a promotion focus because these groups provide a better opportunity to sustain nurturance and achievement needs. Alternativel…
Strength and Safety in Numbers
The present article examines how individual and situational differences in individuals' regulatory focus on nurturance and gain (promotion) and on security and safety (prevention) may have significant, and distinct, social and interpersonal implications. We first review recent research examining how significant others affect goal pursuit and how individual differences in regulatory focus may moderate the various behavioral, evaluative, and experi…
The Bogus Pipeline and Motivations to Respond without Prejudice
The current work draws upon recent developments in attitude and prejudice theory as well as the assessment of people's motivation to respond without prejudice in order to reexamine the classic bogus pipeline technique. Specifically, the present study examines the joint impact of individual differences in the source of motivation to respond without prejudice and the social context in which racial beliefs are reported (i.e. private, public, pipelin…
Implicit regulatory focus associated with asymmetrical frontal cortical activity
Implicit regulatory focus associated with asymmetrical frontal cortical activity
Why some groups just feel better
The current research applied the regulatory fit hypothesis (E. T. Higgins, 2000) to the evaluation of groups, suggesting that individuals' group appraisal depends on how well the groups fit their regulatory needs. Specifically, it was predicted that higher power groups would fit and be more valued by those individuals with a promotion focus because these groups provide a better opportunity to sustain nurturance and achievement needs. Alternativel…
The Bogus Pipeline and Motivations to Respond without Prejudice
The current work draws upon recent developments in attitude and prejudice theory as well as the assessment of people's motivation to respond without prejudice in order to reexamine the classic bogus pipeline technique. Specifically, the present study examines the joint impact of individual differences in the source of motivation to respond without prejudice and the social context in which racial beliefs are reported (i.e. private, public, pipelin…
When Gender Fits Self-Regulatory Preferences
Females are perceived to have less power than males. These differences in perceived power might render different self-regulatory strategies appropriate: Women should (as members of other low-power groups) care about security, whereas men should (as members of other high-power groups) strive for accomplishment. These regulatory implications of gender provide the basis for regulatory fit between individuals' gender and their regulatory focus. Highe…
The Bogus Pipeline and Motivations to Respond without Prejudice
The current work draws upon recent developments in attitude and prejudice theory as well as the assessment of people's motivation to respond without prejudice in order to reexamine the classic bogus pipeline technique. Specifically, the present study examines the joint impact of individual differences in the source of motivation to respond without prejudice and the social context in which racial beliefs are reported (i.e. private, public, pipelin…
Implicit regulatory focus associated with asymmetrical frontal cortical activity
Strength and Safety in Numbers
The present article examines how individual and situational differences in individuals' regulatory focus on nurturance and gain (promotion) and on security and safety (prevention) may have significant, and distinct, social and interpersonal implications. We first review recent research examining how significant others affect goal pursuit and how individual differences in regulatory focus may moderate the various behavioral, evaluative, and experi…
Why some groups just feel better
The current research applied the regulatory fit hypothesis (E. T. Higgins, 2000) to the evaluation of groups, suggesting that individuals' group appraisal depends on how well the groups fit their regulatory needs. Specifically, it was predicted that higher power groups would fit and be more valued by those individuals with a promotion focus because these groups provide a better opportunity to sustain nurturance and achievement needs. Alternativel…
When Gender Fits Self-Regulatory Preferences
Females are perceived to have less power than males. These differences in perceived power might render different self-regulatory strategies appropriate: Women should (as members of other low-power groups) care about security, whereas men should (as members of other high-power groups) strive for accomplishment. These regulatory implications of gender provide the basis for regulatory fit between individuals' gender and their regulatory focus. Highe…
Psychology (5 obras) · Social Psychology (5 obras) · Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 obras) · Regulatory focus theory (4 obras) · Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 obras) · Promotion (chess) (3 obras) · Cultural Differences and Values (2 obras) · Developmental psychology (2 obras) · Political science (2 obras) · Power (physics) (2 obras)