Monelle Parent
Biographic Data
| ID | 4256342 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Monelle Parent |
| GIVEN NAMES | Monelle |
| FAMILY NAME | Parent |
| SIGNATURE | PARENT M |
| AFFILIATIONS | Université de Sherbrooke |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 7 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2010 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2011 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Moral Arguments in the Debate over Nanotechnologies
How are we to understand the fact that the philosophical debate over nanotechnologies has been reduced to a clash of seemingly preprogrammed arguments and counterarguments that paralyzes all rational discussion of the ultimate ethical question of social acceptability in matters of nanotechnological development? With this issue as its starting point, the study reported on here, intended to further comprehension of the issues rather than provide a …
The Social and Ethical Acceptability of NBICs for Purposes of Human Enhancement
The emergence and development of convergent technologies for the purpose of improving human performance, including nanotechnology, biotechnology, information sciences, and cognitive science (NBICs), open up new horizons in the debates and moral arguments that must be engaged by philosophers who hope to take seriously the question of the ethical and social acceptability of these technologies. This article advances an analysis of the factors that c…
Les comités d’éthique de la recherche sur l’humain
Cet article présente les résultats d’une étude pancanadienne qui a été menée entre octobre 2007 et juin 2008 auprès de deux catégories de chercheurs canadiens, soit des médecins-chercheurs et des chercheurs académiques, dont les principaux domaines de recherche se situaient en sciences humaines, en sciences sociales, en sciences de la santé ou en sciences naturelles et génie et qui avaient soumis à un comité d’éthique de la recherche leur protoco…
The Social and Ethical Acceptability of NBICs for Purposes of Human Enhancement
The emergence and development of convergent technologies for the purpose of improving human performance, including nanotechnology, biotechnology, information sciences, and cognitive science (NBICs), open up new horizons in the debates and moral arguments that must be engaged by philosophers who hope to take seriously the question of the ethical and social acceptability of these technologies. This article advances an analysis of the factors that c…
Moral Arguments in the Debate over Nanotechnologies
How are we to understand the fact that the philosophical debate over nanotechnologies has been reduced to a clash of seemingly preprogrammed arguments and counterarguments that paralyzes all rational discussion of the ultimate ethical question of social acceptability in matters of nanotechnological development? With this issue as its starting point, the study reported on here, intended to further comprehension of the issues rather than provide a …
Les comités d’éthique de la recherche sur l’humain
Cet article présente les résultats d’une étude pancanadienne qui a été menée entre octobre 2007 et juin 2008 auprès de deux catégories de chercheurs canadiens, soit des médecins-chercheurs et des chercheurs académiques, dont les principaux domaines de recherche se situaient en sciences humaines, en sciences sociales, en sciences de la santé ou en sciences naturelles et génie et qui avaient soumis à un comité d’éthique de la recherche leur protoco…
Les comités d’éthique de la recherche sur l’humain
Cet article présente les résultats d’une étude pancanadienne qui a été menée entre octobre 2007 et juin 2008 auprès de deux catégories de chercheurs canadiens, soit des médecins-chercheurs et des chercheurs académiques, dont les principaux domaines de recherche se situaient en sciences humaines, en sciences sociales, en sciences de la santé ou en sciences naturelles et génie et qui avaient soumis à un comité d’éthique de la recherche leur protoco…
Moral Arguments in the Debate over Nanotechnologies
How are we to understand the fact that the philosophical debate over nanotechnologies has been reduced to a clash of seemingly preprogrammed arguments and counterarguments that paralyzes all rational discussion of the ultimate ethical question of social acceptability in matters of nanotechnological development? With this issue as its starting point, the study reported on here, intended to further comprehension of the issues rather than provide a …
The Social and Ethical Acceptability of NBICs for Purposes of Human Enhancement
The emergence and development of convergent technologies for the purpose of improving human performance, including nanotechnology, biotechnology, information sciences, and cognitive science (NBICs), open up new horizons in the debates and moral arguments that must be engaged by philosophers who hope to take seriously the question of the ethical and social acceptability of these technologies. This article advances an analysis of the factors that c…
Philosophy (3 works) · Environmental ethics (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Philosophy of science (2 works) · Philosophy of technology (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Argument (complex analysis (1 work) · Argumentation theory (1 work)