Samantha Bielen
Biographic Data
| ID | 4266170 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Samantha Bielen |
| GIVEN NAMES | Samantha |
| FAMILY NAME | Bielen |
| SIGNATURE | BIELEN S |
| AFFILIATIONS | Hasselt University |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-4525-7446 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 9 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 12 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 9 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2018 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Justice under threat
Sisterhood and credible narratives
Prosecutors and crime deterrence
Blame based on one's name? Extralegal disparities in criminal conviction and sentencing
Quality of judicial institutions, crimes, misdemeanors, and dishonesty
Gender-based judicial ingroup bias in sex crime sentencing
Consumer Confidence and Household Saving Behaviors
How Courts Decide Federalism Disputes
An urgent question in contemporary federal theory is how institutions impact upon the centralization grade of multi-tiered systems. This article focuses on constitutional courts as one of such institutions. It constructs a classification for measuring a court’s position in federalism disputes and tests hypotheses about what determines variation across decisions within one court. The case study is Belgium, as a model of contemporary fragmenting sy…
The Duration of Judicial Deliberation
We utilize case-level data from a large Belgian court to study a policy-relevant but thus far empirically unexplored aspect of judicial behavior: the time that a judge takes to deliberate on a case before rendering a verdict. Exploiting the de facto random administrative assignment of filed cases among the serving judges and using survival-analysis methods, we find that the duration of judicial deliberation varies not only with measures of case c…
How Courts Decide Federalism Disputes
An urgent question in contemporary federal theory is how institutions impact upon the centralization grade of multi-tiered systems. This article focuses on constitutional courts as one of such institutions. It constructs a classification for measuring a court’s position in federalism disputes and tests hypotheses about what determines variation across decisions within one court. The case study is Belgium, as a model of contemporary fragmenting sy…
Consumer Confidence and Household Saving Behaviors
Gender-based judicial ingroup bias in sex crime sentencing
The Duration of Judicial Deliberation
We utilize case-level data from a large Belgian court to study a policy-relevant but thus far empirically unexplored aspect of judicial behavior: the time that a judge takes to deliberate on a case before rendering a verdict. Exploiting the de facto random administrative assignment of filed cases among the serving judges and using survival-analysis methods, we find that the duration of judicial deliberation varies not only with measures of case c…
How Courts Decide Federalism Disputes
An urgent question in contemporary federal theory is how institutions impact upon the centralization grade of multi-tiered systems. This article focuses on constitutional courts as one of such institutions. It constructs a classification for measuring a court’s position in federalism disputes and tests hypotheses about what determines variation across decisions within one court. The case study is Belgium, as a model of contemporary fragmenting sy…
Quality of judicial institutions, crimes, misdemeanors, and dishonesty
Gender-based judicial ingroup bias in sex crime sentencing
Consumer Confidence and Household Saving Behaviors
Blame based on one's name? Extralegal disparities in criminal conviction and sentencing
Prosecutors and crime deterrence
Sisterhood and credible narratives
Justice under threat
Political science (7 works) · Law (5 works) · Psychology (5 works) · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 works) · Criminology (4 works) · Social Psychology (4 works) · Economics (3 works) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Adjudication (2 works)