Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Margaret Samahita

Biographic Data

ID4267100
NAMEMargaret Samahita
GIVEN NAMESMargaret
FAMILY NAMESamahita
SIGNATURESAMAHITA M
AFFILIATIONSUniversity College Dublin
ORCID0000-0002-8693-1185
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS8
TOTAL CITATIONS11
AUTHOR COUNT8
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2019
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX1
  • “Luxury beliefs”

    Open Access•Margaret Samahita•ARTICLE•Journal of Behavioral and…•2026

  • Vulnerability to and acceptability of different types of sludge

    Open Access•Leonhard K Lades, Margaret Samahita et al.•ARTICLE•Behavioural Public Policy•2025•References: 27

    Sludge is one of the most important yet underappreciated problems in modern society. Examples of sludge include unnecessarily complex paperwork requirements, hard-to-navigate documents and websites, long waiting time, and unfriendly or confusing staff interactions. However, little is known about whether some people are more vulnerable to and less accepting of some types of sludge than others. Drawing on data from a nationally representative surve…

  • Anchoring and subjective belief distributions

    Open Access•Håkan J Holm, Margaret Samahita et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Economic Behavior &…•2025•References: 5

    We investigate how the anchoring effect—a well-established cognitive bias—influences subjective belief distributions. While prior research extensively examines the impact of anchoring and other biases on point estimates, their effect on the underlying distribution and its higher moments remains unexplored. Using two pre-registered online experiments (N = 1467) and two elicitation methods, we find that anchoring impacts not just the mean, but also…

  • Are Economics Conferences Gender‐Neutral? Evidence from Ireland

    Open Access•Margaret Samahita, Kevin Devereux•ARTICLE•Oxford Bulletin of Economics and…•2024

    We study gender inequality in conference acceptance using data from the Irish Economic Association annual conference from 2016 to 2022, exploiting the introduction of anonymized submission in 2021 to study the effect of blinding. While no gender gap is observed in organizers' acceptance decisions, there is an indication of gender difference favouring the in‐group at the reviewer stage. In particular, male reviewers persistently give higher scores…

  • Compliance Spending Aversion

    Open Access•Margaret Samahita, Leonhard K Lades et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Behavioral Public…•2023

    Charities are increasingly required to spend more resources on administrative tasks to comply with regulations. Given previous findings on donors’ overhead aversion, namely that donors avoid giving to charities with a high ratio of overhead relative to program spending, we investigate whether donors also penalize charities that spend high shares of donations on administrative compliance tasks, despite these tasks being outside the charities’ cont…

  • No mood effects in the field

    Open Access•Margaret Samahita, Håkan J Holm•ARTICLE•Journal of Economic Psychology•2023•References: 31

    We study mood effect in the field to measure its economic impact and address shortcomings in the existing literature, which typically uses one single mood proxy and ignores selection effects. Using over 50 million car inspections in Sweden and England and multiple mood proxies, we study whether car inspectors are more lenient on good mood days and if car owners self-select into those days. We find evidence of a “Friday effect” in England and a sm…

  • Can ❤s Change Minds? Social Media Endorsements and Policy Preferences

    Open Access•Pierluigi Conzo, Laura K Taylor et al.•ARTICLE•Social Media + Society•2023•Cited by: 1•References: 62

    We investigate the effect of social media endorsements (likes, retweets, shares) on individuals' policy preferences. In two pre-registered online experiments ( N = 1,384), we exposed participants to non-neutral policy messages about the COVID-19 pandemic (emphasizing either public health or economic activity as a policy priority) while varying the level of endorsements of these messages. Our experimental treatment did not result in aggregate chan…

  • What drives home solar PV uptake? Subsidies, peer effects and visibility in Sweden

    Open Access•Luis Mundaca, Margaret Samahita•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2019•Cited by: 10•References: 4

  • What drives home solar PV uptake? Subsidies, peer effects and visibility in Sweden

    Open Access•Luis Mundaca, Margaret Samahita•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2019•Cited by: 10•References: 4

  • Can ❤s Change Minds? Social Media Endorsements and Policy Preferences

    Open Access•Pierluigi Conzo, Laura K Taylor et al.•ARTICLE•Social Media + Society•2023•Cited by: 1•References: 62

    We investigate the effect of social media endorsements (likes, retweets, shares) on individuals' policy preferences. In two pre-registered online experiments ( N = 1,384), we exposed participants to non-neutral policy messages about the COVID-19 pandemic (emphasizing either public health or economic activity as a policy priority) while varying the level of endorsements of these messages. Our experimental treatment did not result in aggregate chan…

  • What drives home solar PV uptake? Subsidies, peer effects and visibility in Sweden

    Open Access•Luis Mundaca, Margaret Samahita•ARTICLE•Energy Research & Social Science•2019•Cited by: 10•References: 4

  • Compliance Spending Aversion

    Open Access•Margaret Samahita, Leonhard K Lades et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Behavioral Public…•2023

    Charities are increasingly required to spend more resources on administrative tasks to comply with regulations. Given previous findings on donors’ overhead aversion, namely that donors avoid giving to charities with a high ratio of overhead relative to program spending, we investigate whether donors also penalize charities that spend high shares of donations on administrative compliance tasks, despite these tasks being outside the charities’ cont…

  • No mood effects in the field

    Open Access•Margaret Samahita, Håkan J Holm•ARTICLE•Journal of Economic Psychology•2023•References: 31

    We study mood effect in the field to measure its economic impact and address shortcomings in the existing literature, which typically uses one single mood proxy and ignores selection effects. Using over 50 million car inspections in Sweden and England and multiple mood proxies, we study whether car inspectors are more lenient on good mood days and if car owners self-select into those days. We find evidence of a “Friday effect” in England and a sm…

  • Can ❤s Change Minds? Social Media Endorsements and Policy Preferences

    Open Access•Pierluigi Conzo, Laura K Taylor et al.•ARTICLE•Social Media + Society•2023•Cited by: 1•References: 62

    We investigate the effect of social media endorsements (likes, retweets, shares) on individuals' policy preferences. In two pre-registered online experiments ( N = 1,384), we exposed participants to non-neutral policy messages about the COVID-19 pandemic (emphasizing either public health or economic activity as a policy priority) while varying the level of endorsements of these messages. Our experimental treatment did not result in aggregate chan…

  • Are Economics Conferences Gender‐Neutral? Evidence from Ireland

    Open Access•Margaret Samahita, Kevin Devereux•ARTICLE•Oxford Bulletin of Economics and…•2024

    We study gender inequality in conference acceptance using data from the Irish Economic Association annual conference from 2016 to 2022, exploiting the introduction of anonymized submission in 2021 to study the effect of blinding. While no gender gap is observed in organizers' acceptance decisions, there is an indication of gender difference favouring the in‐group at the reviewer stage. In particular, male reviewers persistently give higher scores…

  • Vulnerability to and acceptability of different types of sludge

    Open Access•Leonhard K Lades, Margaret Samahita et al.•ARTICLE•Behavioural Public Policy•2025•References: 27

    Sludge is one of the most important yet underappreciated problems in modern society. Examples of sludge include unnecessarily complex paperwork requirements, hard-to-navigate documents and websites, long waiting time, and unfriendly or confusing staff interactions. However, little is known about whether some people are more vulnerable to and less accepting of some types of sludge than others. Drawing on data from a nationally representative surve…

  • Anchoring and subjective belief distributions

    Open Access•Håkan J Holm, Margaret Samahita et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Economic Behavior &…•2025•References: 5

    We investigate how the anchoring effect—a well-established cognitive bias—influences subjective belief distributions. While prior research extensively examines the impact of anchoring and other biases on point estimates, their effect on the underlying distribution and its higher moments remains unexplored. Using two pre-registered online experiments (N = 1467) and two elicitation methods, we find that anchoring impacts not just the mean, but also…

  • “Luxury beliefs”

    Open Access•Margaret Samahita•ARTICLE•Journal of Behavioral and…•2026

Psychology (5 works) · Social Psychology (4 works) · Affect (linguistics (3 works) · Business (3 works) · Economics (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Demographic economics (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Medicine (2 works) · Political science (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae