Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Susanne Kopf

Biographic Data

ID4267205
NAMESusanne Kopf
GIVEN NAMESSusanne
FAMILY NAMEKopf
SIGNATUREKOPF S
AFFILIATIONSVienna University of Economics and Business
ORCID0000-0002-1566-9300
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS10
TOTAL CITATIONS10
AUTHOR COUNT9
EDITOR COUNT1
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2017
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX2
  • Unravelling social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS) – four approaches to studying social media through the critical lens

    Open Access•Susanne Kopf•ARTICLE•Critical Discourse Studies•2025•References: 10

    This paper explores the evolution of Social Media Critical Discourse Studies (SM-CDS) and, in this context, outlines four essential approaches for critical research on social media and the underlying communicative paradigm. Thus, the paper adds to existing research in two ways. First, it provides a conceptualisation and visualisation that integrates Digital Discourse Analysis, Critical Discourse Studies, and the critical discourse-analytical stud…

  • Business communication through a corpus linguistic lens

    Open Access•M Gillings, Susanne Kopf•ARTICLE•International Journal of Corpus…•2024

  • Corporate censorship online: Vagueness and discursive imprecision in YouTube’s advertiser-friendly content guidelines

    Open Access•Susanne Kopf•ARTICLE•New Media & Society•2022•Cited by: 4•References: 8

    This article deals with YouTube’s advertiser-friendly content guidelines – the content rules dedicated to defining what YouTube deems advertiser (un)friendly and that YouTube creators seeking to monetise their content through advertising have to follow. Specifically, this study addresses the textual composition of YouTube’s regulations with a focus on occurrences of vagueness. Regarding methods of data analysis, I take a corpus-assisted discourse…

  • In Varietate Concordia? Wikipedia Editor Debates About Eu Culture

    Open Access•Susanne Kopf•ARTICLE•Discourse and Interaction•2021

    This paper addresses how the Wikipedia community has debated the existence of an EU culture on a Wikipedia discussion site between 2001 and 2019. That is, a corpus of discussions among Wikipedia editors (‘Wikipedians’) was examined to shed light on how the Wikipedians involved argue for/against the idea that an overarching EU culture exists at present. This, combined with an examination of debates about concrete cultural elements associated with …

  • Rewarding Good Creators”: Corporate Social Media Discourse on Monetization Schemes for Content Creators

    Open Access•Susanne Kopf•ARTICLE•Social Media + Society•2020•Cited by: 5•References: 1

    This discourse analytical article deals with the power relations between social media corporations and content creators in the context of monetization schemes of social media businesses, i.e., schemes that allow creators to monetize their social media content. Specifically, this study presents an analysis of discourse material pertaining to YouTube’s monetization scheme (the YouTube Partner Program [YPP]) to shed light on the broader point of how…

  • Participation and deliberative discourse on social media – Wikipedia talk pages as transnational public spheres

    Open Access•Susanne Kopf•ARTICLE•Critical Discourse Studies•2020•Cited by: 1•References: 15

    This paper focuses on the potential societal function of Wikipedia beyond serving as an encyclopedia. That is, it assesses both theoretically and empirically whether talk pages (TP) – Wikipedia discussion sites that accompany the encyclopedic entries and provide spaces for debates among Wikipedia editors – may function as transnational public spheres. Despite the increasing number of studies on citizen engagement and participation in the age of s…

  • This is exactly how the Nazis ran it’: (De)legitimising the EU on Wikipedia

    Open Access•Susanne Kopf•ARTICLE•Discourse & Society•2020•References: 10

    This article addresses how the Wikipedia community has grappled with controversial elements of the European Union’s (EU) history from 2001 to 2019. It also examines what perspective on the EU the Wikipedia editors develop in debates about the institution’s history and if/how the community has (de)legitimised the EU’s existence today in the context of discussions about the EU’s predecessors. The data examined consist of Wikipedia contributors’ deb…

  • Discourses of Brexit

    Ursula Lutzky, Andrew Kehoe et al.•BOOK•Discourses of Brexit•2019

  • Discourses of Brexit

    Veronika Koller, Susanne Kopf et al.•BOOK•Discourses of Brexit•2019

  • The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) in the Kronen Zeitung

    Open Access•Susanne Kopf•ARTICLE•Discourse Context & Media•2017•References: 8

  • Rewarding Good Creators”: Corporate Social Media Discourse on Monetization Schemes for Content Creators

    Open Access•Susanne Kopf•ARTICLE•Social Media + Society•2020•Cited by: 5•References: 1

    This discourse analytical article deals with the power relations between social media corporations and content creators in the context of monetization schemes of social media businesses, i.e., schemes that allow creators to monetize their social media content. Specifically, this study presents an analysis of discourse material pertaining to YouTube’s monetization scheme (the YouTube Partner Program [YPP]) to shed light on the broader point of how…

  • Corporate censorship online: Vagueness and discursive imprecision in YouTube’s advertiser-friendly content guidelines

    Open Access•Susanne Kopf•ARTICLE•New Media & Society•2022•Cited by: 4•References: 8

    This article deals with YouTube’s advertiser-friendly content guidelines – the content rules dedicated to defining what YouTube deems advertiser (un)friendly and that YouTube creators seeking to monetise their content through advertising have to follow. Specifically, this study addresses the textual composition of YouTube’s regulations with a focus on occurrences of vagueness. Regarding methods of data analysis, I take a corpus-assisted discourse…

  • Participation and deliberative discourse on social media – Wikipedia talk pages as transnational public spheres

    Open Access•Susanne Kopf•ARTICLE•Critical Discourse Studies•2020•Cited by: 1•References: 15

    This paper focuses on the potential societal function of Wikipedia beyond serving as an encyclopedia. That is, it assesses both theoretically and empirically whether talk pages (TP) – Wikipedia discussion sites that accompany the encyclopedic entries and provide spaces for debates among Wikipedia editors – may function as transnational public spheres. Despite the increasing number of studies on citizen engagement and participation in the age of s…

  • The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) in the Kronen Zeitung

    Open Access•Susanne Kopf•ARTICLE•Discourse Context & Media•2017•References: 8

  • Discourses of Brexit

    Ursula Lutzky, Andrew Kehoe et al.•BOOK•Discourses of Brexit•2019

  • Discourses of Brexit

    Veronika Koller, Susanne Kopf et al.•BOOK•Discourses of Brexit•2019

  • Rewarding Good Creators”: Corporate Social Media Discourse on Monetization Schemes for Content Creators

    Open Access•Susanne Kopf•ARTICLE•Social Media + Society•2020•Cited by: 5•References: 1

    This discourse analytical article deals with the power relations between social media corporations and content creators in the context of monetization schemes of social media businesses, i.e., schemes that allow creators to monetize their social media content. Specifically, this study presents an analysis of discourse material pertaining to YouTube’s monetization scheme (the YouTube Partner Program [YPP]) to shed light on the broader point of how…

  • Participation and deliberative discourse on social media – Wikipedia talk pages as transnational public spheres

    Open Access•Susanne Kopf•ARTICLE•Critical Discourse Studies•2020•Cited by: 1•References: 15

    This paper focuses on the potential societal function of Wikipedia beyond serving as an encyclopedia. That is, it assesses both theoretically and empirically whether talk pages (TP) – Wikipedia discussion sites that accompany the encyclopedic entries and provide spaces for debates among Wikipedia editors – may function as transnational public spheres. Despite the increasing number of studies on citizen engagement and participation in the age of s…

  • This is exactly how the Nazis ran it’: (De)legitimising the EU on Wikipedia

    Open Access•Susanne Kopf•ARTICLE•Discourse & Society•2020•References: 10

    This article addresses how the Wikipedia community has grappled with controversial elements of the European Union’s (EU) history from 2001 to 2019. It also examines what perspective on the EU the Wikipedia editors develop in debates about the institution’s history and if/how the community has (de)legitimised the EU’s existence today in the context of discussions about the EU’s predecessors. The data examined consist of Wikipedia contributors’ deb…

  • In Varietate Concordia? Wikipedia Editor Debates About Eu Culture

    Open Access•Susanne Kopf•ARTICLE•Discourse and Interaction•2021

    This paper addresses how the Wikipedia community has debated the existence of an EU culture on a Wikipedia discussion site between 2001 and 2019. That is, a corpus of discussions among Wikipedia editors (‘Wikipedians’) was examined to shed light on how the Wikipedians involved argue for/against the idea that an overarching EU culture exists at present. This, combined with an examination of debates about concrete cultural elements associated with …

  • Corporate censorship online: Vagueness and discursive imprecision in YouTube’s advertiser-friendly content guidelines

    Open Access•Susanne Kopf•ARTICLE•New Media & Society•2022•Cited by: 4•References: 8

    This article deals with YouTube’s advertiser-friendly content guidelines – the content rules dedicated to defining what YouTube deems advertiser (un)friendly and that YouTube creators seeking to monetise their content through advertising have to follow. Specifically, this study addresses the textual composition of YouTube’s regulations with a focus on occurrences of vagueness. Regarding methods of data analysis, I take a corpus-assisted discourse…

  • Business communication through a corpus linguistic lens

    Open Access•M Gillings, Susanne Kopf•ARTICLE•International Journal of Corpus…•2024

  • Unravelling social media critical discourse studies (SM-CDS) – four approaches to studying social media through the critical lens

    Open Access•Susanne Kopf•ARTICLE•Critical Discourse Studies•2025•References: 10

    This paper explores the evolution of Social Media Critical Discourse Studies (SM-CDS) and, in this context, outlines four essential approaches for critical research on social media and the underlying communicative paradigm. Thus, the paper adds to existing research in two ways. First, it provides a conceptualisation and visualisation that integrates Digital Discourse Analysis, Critical Discourse Studies, and the critical discourse-analytical stud…

Political science (8 works) · Sociology (7 works) · European union (5 works) · Law (5 works) · Business (4 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection (4 works) · Law (4 works) · Philosophy (4 works) · Politics (4 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae