Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Anqi Shao

Biographic Data

ID4267259
NAMEAnqi Shao
GIVEN NAMESAnqi
FAMILY NAMEShao
SIGNATURESHAO A
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison
ORCID0000-0002-4051-2276
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS8
TOTAL CITATIONS11
WORKS AS AUTHOR8
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2020
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX2
  • The human factor in AI governance

    Open Access•Dayeon Eom, Julianne Renner et al.•ARTICLE•Technology in Society•2026

  • When AI Bots do not Follow Instructions

    Anqi Shao, Dietram A Scheufele•ARTICLE•Journal of Broadcasting &…•2026

  • Constructing Vec-tionaries to Extract Message Features from Texts

    Open Access•Z Duan, Anqi Shao et al.•ARTICLE•Political Analysis•2025•References: 37

    While researchers often study message features like moral content in text, such as party manifestos and social media posts, their quantification remains a challenge. Conventional human coding struggles with scalability and intercoder reliability. While dictionary-based methods are cost-effective and computationally efficient, they often lack contextual sensitivity and are limited by the vocabularies developed for the original applications. In thi…

  • What does it mean to “do your own research?” A comparative content analysis of Dyor messages in Instagram and Facebook posts about reproductive health, food, and vaccines

    Open Access•Sedona Chinn, A Hasell et al.•ARTICLE•New Media & Society•2024•References: 43

    Calls to “do your own research” (DYOR) on social media promote a range of claims, from expert-recommended treatments to conspiracy theories. Exploring how the slogan is used offers insight into how individuals navigate concerns about information accuracy in an abundant but low-trust media ecosystem. This quantitative content analysis investigates how DYOR messages in Facebook and Instagram posts about reproductive health, food and diet, and vacci…

  • Media Systems and Attention Cycles

    Open Access•Christopher D Wirz, Anqi Shao et al.•ARTICLE•Journalism & Mass Communication…•2022

    We examined initial newspaper coverage of the COVID-19 outbreak (January–May 2020) in the United States and China, countries with contrasting media systems and pandemic experiences. We join the context-rich media systems literature and the longitudinal nature of the issue-attention literature to expand each by providing more system-level context for explaining how media cover an issue over time. U.S. coverage peaked later and stayed consistently …

  • Science Factionalism

    Open Access•Kaiping Chen, Yepeng Jin et al.•ARTICLE•Social Media + Society•2022•Cited by: 4•References: 66

    Misinformation and intergroup bias are two pathologies challenging informed citizenship. This article examines how identity language is used in misinformation and debunking messages about controversial science on the Chinese digital public spheres and their impact on how the public engage with science. We collected an 8-year time series dataset of public discussion ( N = 6,039) on one of the most controversial science issues in China (GMO) from a…

  • A Mixed Methods Study of Public Perception of Social Distancing

    Open Access•Pauline Ho, Kaiping Chen et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2021•Cited by: 6•References: 10

    In a rapidly changing public health crisis such as COVID-19, researchers need innovative approaches that can effectively link qualitative approaches and computational methods. In this article, computational and qualitative methods are used to analyze survey data collected in March 2020 ( n = 2,270) to explore the content of persuasive messages and their relationship with self-reported health behavior—that is, social distancing. Results suggest th…

  • Enhanced threat or therapeutic benefit? Risk and benefit perceptions of human gene editing by purpose and heritability of edits

    Emily L Howell, Patrice Kohl et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Risk Research•2020•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    Public discourse and deliberation are key to developing socially responsible and acceptable human gene editing research and applications. Researchers have raised concerns, however, that discourse about heritable gene edits, especially for non-therapeutic (or enhancement) purposes, might negatively bias public opinion of applications, including non-heritable edits to cure or prevent disease. Yet limited research exists examining how information ab…

  • A Mixed Methods Study of Public Perception of Social Distancing

    Open Access•Pauline Ho, Kaiping Chen et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2021•Cited by: 6•References: 10

    In a rapidly changing public health crisis such as COVID-19, researchers need innovative approaches that can effectively link qualitative approaches and computational methods. In this article, computational and qualitative methods are used to analyze survey data collected in March 2020 ( n = 2,270) to explore the content of persuasive messages and their relationship with self-reported health behavior—that is, social distancing. Results suggest th…

  • Science Factionalism

    Open Access•Kaiping Chen, Yepeng Jin et al.•ARTICLE•Social Media + Society•2022•Cited by: 4•References: 66

    Misinformation and intergroup bias are two pathologies challenging informed citizenship. This article examines how identity language is used in misinformation and debunking messages about controversial science on the Chinese digital public spheres and their impact on how the public engage with science. We collected an 8-year time series dataset of public discussion ( N = 6,039) on one of the most controversial science issues in China (GMO) from a…

  • Enhanced threat or therapeutic benefit? Risk and benefit perceptions of human gene editing by purpose and heritability of edits

    Emily L Howell, Patrice Kohl et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Risk Research•2020•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    Public discourse and deliberation are key to developing socially responsible and acceptable human gene editing research and applications. Researchers have raised concerns, however, that discourse about heritable gene edits, especially for non-therapeutic (or enhancement) purposes, might negatively bias public opinion of applications, including non-heritable edits to cure or prevent disease. Yet limited research exists examining how information ab…

  • Enhanced threat or therapeutic benefit? Risk and benefit perceptions of human gene editing by purpose and heritability of edits

    Emily L Howell, Patrice Kohl et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Risk Research•2020•Cited by: 1•References: 7

    Public discourse and deliberation are key to developing socially responsible and acceptable human gene editing research and applications. Researchers have raised concerns, however, that discourse about heritable gene edits, especially for non-therapeutic (or enhancement) purposes, might negatively bias public opinion of applications, including non-heritable edits to cure or prevent disease. Yet limited research exists examining how information ab…

  • A Mixed Methods Study of Public Perception of Social Distancing

    Open Access•Pauline Ho, Kaiping Chen et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2021•Cited by: 6•References: 10

    In a rapidly changing public health crisis such as COVID-19, researchers need innovative approaches that can effectively link qualitative approaches and computational methods. In this article, computational and qualitative methods are used to analyze survey data collected in March 2020 ( n = 2,270) to explore the content of persuasive messages and their relationship with self-reported health behavior—that is, social distancing. Results suggest th…

  • Media Systems and Attention Cycles

    Open Access•Christopher D Wirz, Anqi Shao et al.•ARTICLE•Journalism & Mass Communication…•2022

    We examined initial newspaper coverage of the COVID-19 outbreak (January–May 2020) in the United States and China, countries with contrasting media systems and pandemic experiences. We join the context-rich media systems literature and the longitudinal nature of the issue-attention literature to expand each by providing more system-level context for explaining how media cover an issue over time. U.S. coverage peaked later and stayed consistently …

  • Science Factionalism

    Open Access•Kaiping Chen, Yepeng Jin et al.•ARTICLE•Social Media + Society•2022•Cited by: 4•References: 66

    Misinformation and intergroup bias are two pathologies challenging informed citizenship. This article examines how identity language is used in misinformation and debunking messages about controversial science on the Chinese digital public spheres and their impact on how the public engage with science. We collected an 8-year time series dataset of public discussion ( N = 6,039) on one of the most controversial science issues in China (GMO) from a…

  • What does it mean to “do your own research?” A comparative content analysis of Dyor messages in Instagram and Facebook posts about reproductive health, food, and vaccines

    Open Access•Sedona Chinn, A Hasell et al.•ARTICLE•New Media & Society•2024•References: 43

    Calls to “do your own research” (DYOR) on social media promote a range of claims, from expert-recommended treatments to conspiracy theories. Exploring how the slogan is used offers insight into how individuals navigate concerns about information accuracy in an abundant but low-trust media ecosystem. This quantitative content analysis investigates how DYOR messages in Facebook and Instagram posts about reproductive health, food and diet, and vacci…

  • Constructing Vec-tionaries to Extract Message Features from Texts

    Open Access•Z Duan, Anqi Shao et al.•ARTICLE•Political Analysis•2025•References: 37

    While researchers often study message features like moral content in text, such as party manifestos and social media posts, their quantification remains a challenge. Conventional human coding struggles with scalability and intercoder reliability. While dictionary-based methods are cost-effective and computationally efficient, they often lack contextual sensitivity and are limited by the vocabularies developed for the original applications. In thi…

  • The human factor in AI governance

    Open Access•Dayeon Eom, Julianne Renner et al.•ARTICLE•Technology in Society•2026

  • When AI Bots do not Follow Instructions

    Anqi Shao, Dietram A Scheufele•ARTICLE•Journal of Broadcasting &…•2026

Psychology (5 works) · Computer Science (4 works) · Sociology (4 works) · Perception (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Advertising (2 works) · Business (2 works) · China (2 works) · Climate Change Communication and Perception (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae