Thomas Coendet
Biographic Data
| ID | 4276983 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Thomas Coendet |
| GIVEN NAMES | Thomas |
| FAMILY NAME | Coendet |
| SIGNATURE | COENDET T |
| AFFILIATIONS | Distinguished Research Fellow and Assistant Professor at Shanghai Jiao Tong University; 1954 Huashan Road, 200030, Shanghai, China |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 4 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2012 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2019 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Critical Legal Orientalism
Critical legal Orientalism is a tale of two empires, the United States and China. In the mid-nineteenth century, the United States established a special U.S. court for China, thus incorporating China as the largest district of their jurisdiction. This extraterritorial court operated for about a century and advanced an American legal imperialism in China that continues today. It is an empire founded on the notion of China as a place where law actu…
Legal Reasoning
Referring to foreign legal systems for the sake of producing a convincing judicial argument has been a custom in judicial decision-making for more than a century. However, a generally accepted theoretical framework for this kind of reasoning is yet to be established. The article suggests that such a framework must answer at least the following three fundamental questions: first, what is the normative relationship, as a matter of principle, betwee…
Rechtsvergleichende Argumentation
Comparative Legal Reasoning. A Theory of the Comparative Approach in Contemporary Legal Discourse.
Rechtsvergleichende Argumentation
Critical Legal Orientalism
Critical legal Orientalism is a tale of two empires, the United States and China. In the mid-nineteenth century, the United States established a special U.S. court for China, thus incorporating China as the largest district of their jurisdiction. This extraterritorial court operated for about a century and advanced an American legal imperialism in China that continues today. It is an empire founded on the notion of China as a place where law actu…
Rechtsvergleichende Argumentation
Comparative Legal Reasoning. A Theory of the Comparative Approach in Contemporary Legal Discourse.
Rechtsvergleichende Argumentation
Legal Reasoning
Referring to foreign legal systems for the sake of producing a convincing judicial argument has been a custom in judicial decision-making for more than a century. However, a generally accepted theoretical framework for this kind of reasoning is yet to be established. The article suggests that such a framework must answer at least the following three fundamental questions: first, what is the normative relationship, as a matter of principle, betwee…
Critical Legal Orientalism
Critical legal Orientalism is a tale of two empires, the United States and China. In the mid-nineteenth century, the United States established a special U.S. court for China, thus incorporating China as the largest district of their jurisdiction. This extraterritorial court operated for about a century and advanced an American legal imperialism in China that continues today. It is an empire founded on the notion of China as a place where law actu…
Argumentation theory (2 works) · Epistemology (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Philosophy (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Argumentation (1 work) · China (1 work) · Comparative and International Law Studies (1 work) · Comparative law (1 work)