Neil R Paine
Biographic Data
| ID | 4371075 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Neil R Paine |
| GIVEN NAMES | Neil R |
| FAMILY NAME | Paine |
| SIGNATURE | PAINE N R |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 3 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 3 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 3 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1988 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1990 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Acceptability Voting
Nurmi has analysed a number of voting procedures with respect to various criteria. It has been pointed out that acceptability voting not only fares as well as approval voting under Nurmi's type of analysis but also may be more intuitively appealing to voters
Voting Procedures
This Comment proposes a new procedure for selecting a single winner in a multicandidate election. This procedure may be viewed as an offspeing of two other procedures which have been recently analysed in this journal
An Extension of Nurmi's Summary Analysis of Voting Procedures
Nurmi has analysed a number of voting procedures with respect to various criteria. The purpose of this Comment is to extend Nurmi's analysis to include the so-called social utility method of candidate selection. This method assumes that each voter has a von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function defined over all candidates (i.e., that, roughly speaking, each voter can assign a cardinal rating to each candidate); then the winning candidate is the on…
Acceptability Voting
Nurmi has analysed a number of voting procedures with respect to various criteria. It has been pointed out that acceptability voting not only fares as well as approval voting under Nurmi's type of analysis but also may be more intuitively appealing to voters
Voting Procedures
This Comment proposes a new procedure for selecting a single winner in a multicandidate election. This procedure may be viewed as an offspeing of two other procedures which have been recently analysed in this journal
An Extension of Nurmi's Summary Analysis of Voting Procedures
Nurmi has analysed a number of voting procedures with respect to various criteria. The purpose of this Comment is to extend Nurmi's analysis to include the so-called social utility method of candidate selection. This method assumes that each voter has a von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function defined over all candidates (i.e., that, roughly speaking, each voter can assign a cardinal rating to each candidate); then the winning candidate is the on…
Voting Procedures
This Comment proposes a new procedure for selecting a single winner in a multicandidate election. This procedure may be viewed as an offspeing of two other procedures which have been recently analysed in this journal
An Extension of Nurmi's Summary Analysis of Voting Procedures
Nurmi has analysed a number of voting procedures with respect to various criteria. The purpose of this Comment is to extend Nurmi's analysis to include the so-called social utility method of candidate selection. This method assumes that each voter has a von Neumann-Morgenstern utility function defined over all candidates (i.e., that, roughly speaking, each voter can assign a cardinal rating to each candidate); then the winning candidate is the on…
Acceptability Voting
Nurmi has analysed a number of voting procedures with respect to various criteria. It has been pointed out that acceptability voting not only fares as well as approval voting under Nurmi's type of analysis but also may be more intuitively appealing to voters
Computer Science (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Voting (3 works) · Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 works) · Game Theory and Voting Systems (2 works) · Mathematics (2 works) · Politics (2 works) · Anti-plurality voting (1 work)