Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Peter C Hanson

Biographic Data

ID4371940
NAMEPeter C Hanson
GIVEN NAMESPeter C
FAMILY NAMEHanson
SIGNATUREHANSON P C
AFFILIATIONSGrinnell College
ORCID0009-0007-0220-8314
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS5
TOTAL CITATIONS67
AUTHOR COUNT5
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2009
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX2
  • The Limits of Egalitarianism: Responses to a Racial Frame on the Use of Standardized Tests in College Admissions

    Open Access•Peter C Hanson•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•2025•References: 12

    This article presents the results of a survey experiment fielded on a 1,000-person live interview telephone poll designed to test the effects of a racial frame on attitudes about the use of standardized tests in college admissions. Respondents were presented with one of two versions of a question about whether it is fair for colleges to always admit the candidate with higher standardized test scores when comparing two applicants. Both versions of…

  • Wallner, James I. On Parliamentary War: Partisan Conflict and Procedural Change in the U.S. Senate

    Peter C Hanson, Peter Hanson•ARTICLE•Congress & the Presidency•2019

    Wallner, James I. On Parliamentary War: Partisan Conflict and Procedural Change in the U.S. Senate." Congress & the Presidency, 46(2), pp. 348–349

  • Koger, Gregory, and Matthew J. Lebo, Strategic Party Government: Why Winning Trumps Ideology

    Peter C Hanson, Peter Hanson•ARTICLE•Congress & the Presidency•2017•References: 1

    Koger, Gregory, and Matthew J. Lebo, Strategic Party Government: Why Winning Trumps Ideology." Congress & the Presidency, 44(3), pp. 387–388

  • Abandoning the Regular Order: Majority Party Influence on Appropriations in the U.S. Senate

    Open Access•Peter C Hanson•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•2014•Cited by: 4•References: 24

    There is a debate about the extent of the Senate majority party’s influence and the conditions under which it is used. This article demonstrates that the majority party influences legislative outcomes to meet electoral goals and protect its reputation by manipulating the consideration of the dozen annual appropriations bills. The majority party limits amendments and eases passage of the budget when it abandons the “regular order” and creates an o…

  • The Senate Electoral Cycle and Bicameral Appropriations Politics

    Open Access•Kenneth A Shepsle, Robert P Van Houweling et al.•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•2009•Cited by: 63•References: 29

    We consider the consequences of the Senate electoral cycle and bicameralism for distributive politics, introducing the concept of contested credit claiming, i.e., that members of a state's House and Senate delegations must share the credit for appropriations that originate in their chamber with delegation members in the other chamber. Using data that isolate appropriations of each chamber, we test a model of the strategic incentives contested cre…

  • The Senate Electoral Cycle and Bicameral Appropriations Politics

    Open Access•Kenneth A Shepsle, Robert P Van Houweling et al.•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•2009•Cited by: 63•References: 29

    We consider the consequences of the Senate electoral cycle and bicameralism for distributive politics, introducing the concept of contested credit claiming, i.e., that members of a state's House and Senate delegations must share the credit for appropriations that originate in their chamber with delegation members in the other chamber. Using data that isolate appropriations of each chamber, we test a model of the strategic incentives contested cre…

  • Abandoning the Regular Order: Majority Party Influence on Appropriations in the U.S. Senate

    Open Access•Peter C Hanson•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•2014•Cited by: 4•References: 24

    There is a debate about the extent of the Senate majority party’s influence and the conditions under which it is used. This article demonstrates that the majority party influences legislative outcomes to meet electoral goals and protect its reputation by manipulating the consideration of the dozen annual appropriations bills. The majority party limits amendments and eases passage of the budget when it abandons the “regular order” and creates an o…

  • The Senate Electoral Cycle and Bicameral Appropriations Politics

    Open Access•Kenneth A Shepsle, Robert P Van Houweling et al.•ARTICLE•American Journal of Political…•2009•Cited by: 63•References: 29

    We consider the consequences of the Senate electoral cycle and bicameralism for distributive politics, introducing the concept of contested credit claiming, i.e., that members of a state's House and Senate delegations must share the credit for appropriations that originate in their chamber with delegation members in the other chamber. Using data that isolate appropriations of each chamber, we test a model of the strategic incentives contested cre…

  • Abandoning the Regular Order: Majority Party Influence on Appropriations in the U.S. Senate

    Open Access•Peter C Hanson•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•2014•Cited by: 4•References: 24

    There is a debate about the extent of the Senate majority party’s influence and the conditions under which it is used. This article demonstrates that the majority party influences legislative outcomes to meet electoral goals and protect its reputation by manipulating the consideration of the dozen annual appropriations bills. The majority party limits amendments and eases passage of the budget when it abandons the “regular order” and creates an o…

  • Koger, Gregory, and Matthew J. Lebo, Strategic Party Government: Why Winning Trumps Ideology

    Peter C Hanson, Peter Hanson•ARTICLE•Congress & the Presidency•2017•References: 1

    Koger, Gregory, and Matthew J. Lebo, Strategic Party Government: Why Winning Trumps Ideology." Congress & the Presidency, 44(3), pp. 387–388

  • Wallner, James I. On Parliamentary War: Partisan Conflict and Procedural Change in the U.S. Senate

    Peter C Hanson, Peter Hanson•ARTICLE•Congress & the Presidency•2019

    Wallner, James I. On Parliamentary War: Partisan Conflict and Procedural Change in the U.S. Senate." Congress & the Presidency, 46(2), pp. 348–349

  • The Limits of Egalitarianism: Responses to a Racial Frame on the Use of Standardized Tests in College Admissions

    Open Access•Peter C Hanson•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•2025•References: 12

    This article presents the results of a survey experiment fielded on a 1,000-person live interview telephone poll designed to test the effects of a racial frame on attitudes about the use of standardized tests in college admissions. Respondents were presented with one of two versions of a question about whether it is fair for colleges to always admit the candidate with higher standardized test scores when comparing two applicants. Both versions of…

Law (5 works) · Law (5 works) · Political science (5 works) · Politics (5 works) · Electoral Systems and Political Participation (4 works) · Public Administration (4 works) · Public Administration (4 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Economics (2 works) · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae