Janet Hiebert
Biographic Data
| ID | 4374266 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Janet Hiebert |
| GIVEN NAMES | Janet |
| FAMILY NAME | Hiebert |
| SIGNATURE | HIEBERT J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Canadian Political Science Association |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 11 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 5 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1992 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2013 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
The courts/parliament trade-off: Canadian attitudes on judicial influence in public policy
Do citizens have meaningful attitudes – i.e. enduring, subjectively important and psychologically consequential evaluative orientations – regarding the relative roles of courts and legislatures in resolving contentious issues of public policy? If so, what explains these preferences? Using data from the Canadian Election Study, the authors find that Canadians possess meaningful attitudes on what they term the ‘courts/parliament trade-off’. They al…
Société québécoise de science politique
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button
Canadian Political Science Association/Association canadienne de science politique
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button
Canada: The State of the Federation 1994
Reasoning with the CharterLeon E. Trakman Toronto: Butterworths, 1991, pp. xxi, 219
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Canada: The State of the Federation 1994
The courts/parliament trade-off: Canadian attitudes on judicial influence in public policy
Do citizens have meaningful attitudes – i.e. enduring, subjectively important and psychologically consequential evaluative orientations – regarding the relative roles of courts and legislatures in resolving contentious issues of public policy? If so, what explains these preferences? Using data from the Canadian Election Study, the authors find that Canadians possess meaningful attitudes on what they term the ‘courts/parliament trade-off’. They al…
Reasoning with the CharterLeon E. Trakman Toronto: Butterworths, 1991, pp. xxi, 219
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content
Canada: The State of the Federation 1994
Société québécoise de science politique
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button
Canadian Political Science Association/Association canadienne de science politique
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button
The courts/parliament trade-off: Canadian attitudes on judicial influence in public policy
Do citizens have meaningful attitudes – i.e. enduring, subjectively important and psychologically consequential evaluative orientations – regarding the relative roles of courts and legislatures in resolving contentious issues of public policy? If so, what explains these preferences? Using data from the Canadian Election Study, the authors find that Canadians possess meaningful attitudes on what they term the ‘courts/parliament trade-off’. They al…
Political science (5 works) · Action (physics (2 works) · Canadian Identity and History (2 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Content (measure theory (2 works) · Judicial and Constitutional Studies (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Mathematics (2 works) · Physics (2 works)