Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Rainer Eising

Biographic Data

ID4375359
NAMERainer Eising
GIVEN NAMESRainer
FAMILY NAMEEising
SIGNATUREEISING R
AFFILIATIONSRuhr University Bochum
ORCID0000-0001-9843-6918
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS25
TOTAL CITATIONS811
AUTHOR COUNT24
EDITOR COUNT1
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR1999
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2021
H-INDEX13
  • Business interests, public interests, and experts in parliamentary committees: Their impact on legislative amendments in the German Bundestag

    James P Cro, James P Cross et al.•ARTICLE•West European Politics•2021•Cited by: 20•References: 34

    This study examines the evolving role of parliamentary committees in legislative decision-making and their relationships with external actors when amending bills. Drawing on resource dependence theory and informational perspectives on parliamentary committees, we analyse the impact of information provided by business interest organizations, public interest groups, and experts in the German Bundestag's public hearings in 2004, 2007, and 2011. Usin…

  • Uncovering interest group participation in Germany: Web collection of written statements in ministries and the parliament

    Open Access•Daniel Rasch, Florian Spohr et al.•ARTICLE•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2020•Cited by: 3•References: 23

    This article discusses web collection of interest group statements on bills as a data source. Written statements allow the identification of actors active in policy-making as well as those actors’ positions, lobbying coalitions and issue saliency. These data also can contribute to the measurement of interest groups’ influence on legislation. Taking web collection from the German parliament’s and ministries’ web pages as an example, we demonstrate…

  • National interest organisations in EU policy-making

    Rainer Eising, Daniel Rasch et al.•ARTICLE•West European Politics•2017•Cited by: 8•References: 37

    Comparative and EU interest group studies are marked by a progression towards theory-driven, large-N empirical studies in the past 20 years. With the study of national interest organisations in EU policy-making, this special issue puts centre stage a theoretically and empirically neglected topic in this research field. The individual contributions include interest group characteristics, institutional contexts as well as issue contexts as explanat…

  • Imperfect public goods and the logic of selective exit in EU interest organisations

    Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•West European Politics•2017•Cited by: 4•References: 23

    How do national members react to performance failures of EU-level interest groups? Albert Hirschman suggested two responses: exit and voice. Building on this distinction, the article develops the category of selective exit which denotes members' interest representation outside the boundaries of the EU-level interest organisation in response to performance failures. Selective exit enables members to raise voice from within and exert pressure from …

  • Who says what to whom? Alignments and arguments in EU policy-making

    Rainer Eising, Daniel Rasch et al.•ARTICLE•West European Politics•2017•Cited by: 17•References: 40

    In the EU multilevel polity, domestic interest groups seek to shape EU legislation by accessing both national and EU institutions. Previous studies indicated that institutional and issue contexts as well as organisational characteristics shape their strategies of interest representation. However, we know much less about how alignments and arguments impact on their participation in EU and national policy consultations. Addressing this gap, we inve…

  • The More, the Merrier? Interest Groups and Legislative Change in the Public Hearings of the German Parliamentary Committees

    Rainer Eising, Florian Spohr•ARTICLE•German Politics•2017•Cited by: 30

    The article examines the impact of organised interests on the passage of legislation in the German Bundestag through an empirical analysis of the position papers presented in the public hearings of its standing committees in 2011. These committees are the most important forums to revise legislative proposals. Drawing on resource dependency theory, we employ GLM regression analyses to study if interest groups act as change agents that bring legisl…

  • Studying Interest Groups: Methodological challenges and tools

    Open Access•Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•European Political Science•2016•Cited by: 3•References: 31

    Research on interest groups has evolved from a focus on small-N studies to larger-N studies in the past 15 years. While both European and American research has become more sophisticated and aware of methodological aspects, there is yet no specialized literature on methods regarding how to study interest groups. Only few studies discuss the methodological implications of interest group studies, as well as the transferability of methods employed in…

  • Framing processes and lobbying in EU foreign policy: Case study and process-tracing methods

    Open Access•Benedetta Voltolini, Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•European Political Science•2016•Cited by: 7•References: 26

    This article discusses the potential of case study and process-tracing methods for studying lobbying and framing in the European Union (EU). It argues that case studies and process tracing allow us to explore different sets of questions than large-N and quantitative approaches and to shed light on the mechanisms that contribute to policy change. Through these methods it is possible to study long-term processes and under-researched areas, to analy…

  • Selektive Abwanderung im EU-Verbandssystem. Das Strategierepertoire unzufriedener Mitglieder

    Open Access•Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 14

  • Institutions, policies, and arguments: Context and strategy in EU policy framing

    Rainer Eising, Daniel Rasch et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of European Public Policy•2015•Cited by: 38•References: 22

    Studies of framing in the EU political system are still a rarity and they suffer from a lack of systematic empirical analysis. Addressing this gap, we ask if institutional and policy contexts intertwined with the strategic side of framing can explain the number and types of frames employed by different stakeholders. We use a computer-assisted manual content analysis and develop a fourfold typology of frames to study the frames that were prevalent…

  • The Intereuro Project: Logic and structure

    Open Access•Jan Beyers, Laura Chaqués-Bonafont et al.•ARTICLE•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2014•Cited by: 25•References: 17

  • Identifying frames: A comparison of research methods

    Open Access•Frida Boräng, Rainer Eising et al.•ARTICLE•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2014•Cited by: 15•References: 23

  • Liberalisierung und Europäisierung: Die Regulative Reform der Elektrizitätsversorgung in Großbritannien, der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und der Bundesrepublik Deutschland

    Rainer Eising•BOOK•Liberalisierung und Europäisierung•2013

  • Researching Interest Group Politics in Europe and Elsewhere: Much We Study, Little We Know

    Jan Beyers, Rainer Eising et al.•ARTICLE•West European Politics•2008•Cited by: 192•References: 33

    While understanding interest group systems remains crucial to understanding the functioning of advanced democracies, the study of interest groups remains a somewhat niche field within political science. Nevertheless, during the last 15 years, the academic interest in group politics has grown and we reflect on the state of the current literature. The main objective is to take stock, consider the main empirical and theoretical/conceptual achievemen…

  • Clientelism, Committees, Pluralism and Protests in the European Union: Matching Patterns

    Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•West European Politics•2008•Cited by: 19•References: 31

    Many efforts have been made to identify general patterns of interest intermediation in the EU, ranging from early studies about clientela relations to recent depictions of protest politics. This review covers studies that aim at cross-sectoral generalisations as well as analyses that are confined to specific sectors, policy areas, and issues. While many analyses are rooted in the debate on corporatism and pluralism, since the 1990s the conceptual…

  • Conclusion: Embedding Interest Group Research

    Jan Beyers, Rainer Eising et al.•ARTICLE•West European Politics•2008•Cited by: 13•References: 29

    All the contributors to this volume share a belief that the study of interest groups will be advanced through an interactive process that conjoins empirical research with the systematic constructio

  • The access of business interests to EU institutions: Towards Élite Pluralism

    Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•Journal of European Public Policy•2007•Cited by: 101•References: 20

    It has often been suggested that bias in the access of interest organizations to policy-makers leads to biased policies. The paper analyses the access of interest organizations to the EU institutions drawing on data from 800 business interest associations and 34 large firms. Exploring the proposition that some form of élite pluralism may emerge in the EU, it argues that the contact patterns derive from resource dependencies among the political ac…

  • Institutional Context, Organizational Resources and Strategic Choices: Explaining Interest Group Access in the European Union

    Open Access•Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•European Union Politics•2007•Cited by: 153•References: 28

    Drawing on a survey of 800 business associations, the article seeks to explain why interest groups lobby the EU institutions and what groups maintain contacts with them. Rooted in organizational theory, it argues that four main dimensions influence access patterns — institutional context, resource dependencies, interest group organization, and strategic choices. The empirical analysis demonstrates that all dimensions are relevant. Nonetheless, co…

  • Multilevel Governance and Business Interests in the European Union

    Open Access•Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•Governance•2004•Cited by: 82•References: 25

    The article analyzes how business interests responded to European integration. It draws on survey data of eight hundred German, French, British, and European Union (EU) trade associations as well as thirty‐four large firms. The argument is that the multilevel governance approach to European integration captures the realities of EU interest intermediation better than neofunctionalism and intergovernmentalism. The article suggests that the strategi…

  • Transformation of Governance in the European Union

    Beate Kohler-Koch, Rainer Eising•BOOK•Transformation of Governance in…•2003

  • Policy Learning in Embedded Negotiations: Explaining EU Electricity Liberalization

    Open Access•Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•International Organization•2002•Cited by: 40•References: 30

    Taking the example of the liberalization of the electricity supply industy, I analyze member-state negotiations in the European Union (EU). Confronting central tenets of the intergovernmental approach, I suggest that member-state executives act within the limits of bounded rationality and do not always hold clear and fixed preferences. I focus on the large member states Germany, France, and the United Kingdom and identify four institutional mecha…

  • Moving Targets: National Interests and Electricity Liberalization in the European Union

    Open Access•Rainer Eising, Nicolas Jabko•ARTICLE•Comparative Political Studies•2001•Cited by: 39•References: 19

    After 10 years of controversial negotiations, in 1996 the European Union finally took action to liberalize the electricity supply industry. Given the intensity of bilateral contacts between France and Germany, the reform has often been presented as a straightforward intergovernmental deal. This article argues that the French-German deal was only the tip of the iceberg. Perceptions of national interests evolved considerably in both countries. The …

  • Liberalisierung und Europäisierung

    Open Access•Rainer Eising•BOOK•Liberalisierung und Europäisierung•2000

  • Liberalisierung und Europäisierung: (Die Regulative Reform Der Elektrizitätsversorgung In Großbritannien, Der Europäischen Gemeinschaft Und Der . . . … und Staatstätigkeit )

    Rainer Eising•BOOK•Liberalisierung und Europäisierung•2000

  • The Transformation of Governance in the European Union

    Beate Kohler‐koch, Beate Kohler-Koch et al.•BOOK•Transformation of Governance in…•1999

    Part I: The Conceptual Challenge of European Governance Chapter 1. Introduction: Network governance in the European Union Rainer Eising and Beate Kohler-Koch Chapter 2. The evolution and transformation of European governance Beate Kohler-Koch Part II: The Transformation of European Governance: Variations on a Theme Chapter 3. Transformation in European environmental governance Andrea Lenschow Chapter 4. Regulating genetic engineering in the Europ…

  • Researching Interest Group Politics in Europe and Elsewhere: Much We Study, Little We Know

    Jan Beyers, Rainer Eising et al.•ARTICLE•West European Politics•2008•Cited by: 192•References: 33

    While understanding interest group systems remains crucial to understanding the functioning of advanced democracies, the study of interest groups remains a somewhat niche field within political science. Nevertheless, during the last 15 years, the academic interest in group politics has grown and we reflect on the state of the current literature. The main objective is to take stock, consider the main empirical and theoretical/conceptual achievemen…

  • Institutional Context, Organizational Resources and Strategic Choices: Explaining Interest Group Access in the European Union

    Open Access•Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•European Union Politics•2007•Cited by: 153•References: 28

    Drawing on a survey of 800 business associations, the article seeks to explain why interest groups lobby the EU institutions and what groups maintain contacts with them. Rooted in organizational theory, it argues that four main dimensions influence access patterns — institutional context, resource dependencies, interest group organization, and strategic choices. The empirical analysis demonstrates that all dimensions are relevant. Nonetheless, co…

  • The access of business interests to EU institutions: Towards Élite Pluralism

    Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•Journal of European Public Policy•2007•Cited by: 101•References: 20

    It has often been suggested that bias in the access of interest organizations to policy-makers leads to biased policies. The paper analyses the access of interest organizations to the EU institutions drawing on data from 800 business interest associations and 34 large firms. Exploring the proposition that some form of élite pluralism may emerge in the EU, it argues that the contact patterns derive from resource dependencies among the political ac…

  • Multilevel Governance and Business Interests in the European Union

    Open Access•Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•Governance•2004•Cited by: 82•References: 25

    The article analyzes how business interests responded to European integration. It draws on survey data of eight hundred German, French, British, and European Union (EU) trade associations as well as thirty‐four large firms. The argument is that the multilevel governance approach to European integration captures the realities of EU interest intermediation better than neofunctionalism and intergovernmentalism. The article suggests that the strategi…

  • Policy Learning in Embedded Negotiations: Explaining EU Electricity Liberalization

    Open Access•Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•International Organization•2002•Cited by: 40•References: 30

    Taking the example of the liberalization of the electricity supply industy, I analyze member-state negotiations in the European Union (EU). Confronting central tenets of the intergovernmental approach, I suggest that member-state executives act within the limits of bounded rationality and do not always hold clear and fixed preferences. I focus on the large member states Germany, France, and the United Kingdom and identify four institutional mecha…

  • Moving Targets: National Interests and Electricity Liberalization in the European Union

    Open Access•Rainer Eising, Nicolas Jabko•ARTICLE•Comparative Political Studies•2001•Cited by: 39•References: 19

    After 10 years of controversial negotiations, in 1996 the European Union finally took action to liberalize the electricity supply industry. Given the intensity of bilateral contacts between France and Germany, the reform has often been presented as a straightforward intergovernmental deal. This article argues that the French-German deal was only the tip of the iceberg. Perceptions of national interests evolved considerably in both countries. The …

  • Institutions, policies, and arguments: Context and strategy in EU policy framing

    Rainer Eising, Daniel Rasch et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of European Public Policy•2015•Cited by: 38•References: 22

    Studies of framing in the EU political system are still a rarity and they suffer from a lack of systematic empirical analysis. Addressing this gap, we ask if institutional and policy contexts intertwined with the strategic side of framing can explain the number and types of frames employed by different stakeholders. We use a computer-assisted manual content analysis and develop a fourfold typology of frames to study the frames that were prevalent…

  • The More, the Merrier? Interest Groups and Legislative Change in the Public Hearings of the German Parliamentary Committees

    Rainer Eising, Florian Spohr•ARTICLE•German Politics•2017•Cited by: 30

    The article examines the impact of organised interests on the passage of legislation in the German Bundestag through an empirical analysis of the position papers presented in the public hearings of its standing committees in 2011. These committees are the most important forums to revise legislative proposals. Drawing on resource dependency theory, we employ GLM regression analyses to study if interest groups act as change agents that bring legisl…

  • The Intereuro Project: Logic and structure

    Open Access•Jan Beyers, Laura Chaqués-Bonafont et al.•ARTICLE•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2014•Cited by: 25•References: 17

  • Business interests, public interests, and experts in parliamentary committees: Their impact on legislative amendments in the German Bundestag

    James P Cro, James P Cross et al.•ARTICLE•West European Politics•2021•Cited by: 20•References: 34

    This study examines the evolving role of parliamentary committees in legislative decision-making and their relationships with external actors when amending bills. Drawing on resource dependence theory and informational perspectives on parliamentary committees, we analyse the impact of information provided by business interest organizations, public interest groups, and experts in the German Bundestag's public hearings in 2004, 2007, and 2011. Usin…

  • Clientelism, Committees, Pluralism and Protests in the European Union: Matching Patterns

    Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•West European Politics•2008•Cited by: 19•References: 31

    Many efforts have been made to identify general patterns of interest intermediation in the EU, ranging from early studies about clientela relations to recent depictions of protest politics. This review covers studies that aim at cross-sectoral generalisations as well as analyses that are confined to specific sectors, policy areas, and issues. While many analyses are rooted in the debate on corporatism and pluralism, since the 1990s the conceptual…

  • Who says what to whom? Alignments and arguments in EU policy-making

    Rainer Eising, Daniel Rasch et al.•ARTICLE•West European Politics•2017•Cited by: 17•References: 40

    In the EU multilevel polity, domestic interest groups seek to shape EU legislation by accessing both national and EU institutions. Previous studies indicated that institutional and issue contexts as well as organisational characteristics shape their strategies of interest representation. However, we know much less about how alignments and arguments impact on their participation in EU and national policy consultations. Addressing this gap, we inve…

  • Identifying frames: A comparison of research methods

    Open Access•Frida Boräng, Rainer Eising et al.•ARTICLE•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2014•Cited by: 15•References: 23

  • Conclusion: Embedding Interest Group Research

    Jan Beyers, Rainer Eising et al.•ARTICLE•West European Politics•2008•Cited by: 13•References: 29

    All the contributors to this volume share a belief that the study of interest groups will be advanced through an interactive process that conjoins empirical research with the systematic constructio

  • National interest organisations in EU policy-making

    Rainer Eising, Daniel Rasch et al.•ARTICLE•West European Politics•2017•Cited by: 8•References: 37

    Comparative and EU interest group studies are marked by a progression towards theory-driven, large-N empirical studies in the past 20 years. With the study of national interest organisations in EU policy-making, this special issue puts centre stage a theoretically and empirically neglected topic in this research field. The individual contributions include interest group characteristics, institutional contexts as well as issue contexts as explanat…

  • Framing processes and lobbying in EU foreign policy: Case study and process-tracing methods

    Open Access•Benedetta Voltolini, Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•European Political Science•2016•Cited by: 7•References: 26

    This article discusses the potential of case study and process-tracing methods for studying lobbying and framing in the European Union (EU). It argues that case studies and process tracing allow us to explore different sets of questions than large-N and quantitative approaches and to shed light on the mechanisms that contribute to policy change. Through these methods it is possible to study long-term processes and under-researched areas, to analy…

  • Imperfect public goods and the logic of selective exit in EU interest organisations

    Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•West European Politics•2017•Cited by: 4•References: 23

    How do national members react to performance failures of EU-level interest groups? Albert Hirschman suggested two responses: exit and voice. Building on this distinction, the article develops the category of selective exit which denotes members' interest representation outside the boundaries of the EU-level interest organisation in response to performance failures. Selective exit enables members to raise voice from within and exert pressure from …

  • Uncovering interest group participation in Germany: Web collection of written statements in ministries and the parliament

    Open Access•Daniel Rasch, Florian Spohr et al.•ARTICLE•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2020•Cited by: 3•References: 23

    This article discusses web collection of interest group statements on bills as a data source. Written statements allow the identification of actors active in policy-making as well as those actors’ positions, lobbying coalitions and issue saliency. These data also can contribute to the measurement of interest groups’ influence on legislation. Taking web collection from the German parliament’s and ministries’ web pages as an example, we demonstrate…

  • Studying Interest Groups: Methodological challenges and tools

    Open Access•Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•European Political Science•2016•Cited by: 3•References: 31

    Research on interest groups has evolved from a focus on small-N studies to larger-N studies in the past 15 years. While both European and American research has become more sophisticated and aware of methodological aspects, there is yet no specialized literature on methods regarding how to study interest groups. Only few studies discuss the methodological implications of interest group studies, as well as the transferability of methods employed in…

  • Selektive Abwanderung im EU-Verbandssystem. Das Strategierepertoire unzufriedener Mitglieder

    Open Access•Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 14

  • The Transformation of Governance in the European Union

    Beate Kohler‐koch, Beate Kohler-Koch et al.•BOOK•Transformation of Governance in…•1999

    Part I: The Conceptual Challenge of European Governance Chapter 1. Introduction: Network governance in the European Union Rainer Eising and Beate Kohler-Koch Chapter 2. The evolution and transformation of European governance Beate Kohler-Koch Part II: The Transformation of European Governance: Variations on a Theme Chapter 3. Transformation in European environmental governance Andrea Lenschow Chapter 4. Regulating genetic engineering in the Europ…

  • Liberalisierung und Europäisierung

    Open Access•Rainer Eising•BOOK•Liberalisierung und Europäisierung•2000

  • Liberalisierung und Europäisierung: (Die Regulative Reform Der Elektrizitätsversorgung In Großbritannien, Der Europäischen Gemeinschaft Und Der . . . … und Staatstätigkeit )

    Rainer Eising•BOOK•Liberalisierung und Europäisierung•2000

  • Moving Targets: National Interests and Electricity Liberalization in the European Union

    Open Access•Rainer Eising, Nicolas Jabko•ARTICLE•Comparative Political Studies•2001•Cited by: 39•References: 19

    After 10 years of controversial negotiations, in 1996 the European Union finally took action to liberalize the electricity supply industry. Given the intensity of bilateral contacts between France and Germany, the reform has often been presented as a straightforward intergovernmental deal. This article argues that the French-German deal was only the tip of the iceberg. Perceptions of national interests evolved considerably in both countries. The …

  • Policy Learning in Embedded Negotiations: Explaining EU Electricity Liberalization

    Open Access•Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•International Organization•2002•Cited by: 40•References: 30

    Taking the example of the liberalization of the electricity supply industy, I analyze member-state negotiations in the European Union (EU). Confronting central tenets of the intergovernmental approach, I suggest that member-state executives act within the limits of bounded rationality and do not always hold clear and fixed preferences. I focus on the large member states Germany, France, and the United Kingdom and identify four institutional mecha…

  • Transformation of Governance in the European Union

    Beate Kohler-Koch, Rainer Eising•BOOK•Transformation of Governance in…•2003

  • Multilevel Governance and Business Interests in the European Union

    Open Access•Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•Governance•2004•Cited by: 82•References: 25

    The article analyzes how business interests responded to European integration. It draws on survey data of eight hundred German, French, British, and European Union (EU) trade associations as well as thirty‐four large firms. The argument is that the multilevel governance approach to European integration captures the realities of EU interest intermediation better than neofunctionalism and intergovernmentalism. The article suggests that the strategi…

  • The access of business interests to EU institutions: Towards Élite Pluralism

    Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•Journal of European Public Policy•2007•Cited by: 101•References: 20

    It has often been suggested that bias in the access of interest organizations to policy-makers leads to biased policies. The paper analyses the access of interest organizations to the EU institutions drawing on data from 800 business interest associations and 34 large firms. Exploring the proposition that some form of élite pluralism may emerge in the EU, it argues that the contact patterns derive from resource dependencies among the political ac…

  • Institutional Context, Organizational Resources and Strategic Choices: Explaining Interest Group Access in the European Union

    Open Access•Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•European Union Politics•2007•Cited by: 153•References: 28

    Drawing on a survey of 800 business associations, the article seeks to explain why interest groups lobby the EU institutions and what groups maintain contacts with them. Rooted in organizational theory, it argues that four main dimensions influence access patterns — institutional context, resource dependencies, interest group organization, and strategic choices. The empirical analysis demonstrates that all dimensions are relevant. Nonetheless, co…

  • Researching Interest Group Politics in Europe and Elsewhere: Much We Study, Little We Know

    Jan Beyers, Rainer Eising et al.•ARTICLE•West European Politics•2008•Cited by: 192•References: 33

    While understanding interest group systems remains crucial to understanding the functioning of advanced democracies, the study of interest groups remains a somewhat niche field within political science. Nevertheless, during the last 15 years, the academic interest in group politics has grown and we reflect on the state of the current literature. The main objective is to take stock, consider the main empirical and theoretical/conceptual achievemen…

  • Clientelism, Committees, Pluralism and Protests in the European Union: Matching Patterns

    Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•West European Politics•2008•Cited by: 19•References: 31

    Many efforts have been made to identify general patterns of interest intermediation in the EU, ranging from early studies about clientela relations to recent depictions of protest politics. This review covers studies that aim at cross-sectoral generalisations as well as analyses that are confined to specific sectors, policy areas, and issues. While many analyses are rooted in the debate on corporatism and pluralism, since the 1990s the conceptual…

  • Conclusion: Embedding Interest Group Research

    Jan Beyers, Rainer Eising et al.•ARTICLE•West European Politics•2008•Cited by: 13•References: 29

    All the contributors to this volume share a belief that the study of interest groups will be advanced through an interactive process that conjoins empirical research with the systematic constructio

  • Liberalisierung und Europäisierung: Die Regulative Reform der Elektrizitätsversorgung in Großbritannien, der Europäischen Gemeinschaft und der Bundesrepublik Deutschland

    Rainer Eising•BOOK•Liberalisierung und Europäisierung•2013

  • The Intereuro Project: Logic and structure

    Open Access•Jan Beyers, Laura Chaqués-Bonafont et al.•ARTICLE•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2014•Cited by: 25•References: 17

  • Identifying frames: A comparison of research methods

    Open Access•Frida Boräng, Rainer Eising et al.•ARTICLE•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2014•Cited by: 15•References: 23

  • Institutions, policies, and arguments: Context and strategy in EU policy framing

    Rainer Eising, Daniel Rasch et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of European Public Policy•2015•Cited by: 38•References: 22

    Studies of framing in the EU political system are still a rarity and they suffer from a lack of systematic empirical analysis. Addressing this gap, we ask if institutional and policy contexts intertwined with the strategic side of framing can explain the number and types of frames employed by different stakeholders. We use a computer-assisted manual content analysis and develop a fourfold typology of frames to study the frames that were prevalent…

  • Studying Interest Groups: Methodological challenges and tools

    Open Access•Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•European Political Science•2016•Cited by: 3•References: 31

    Research on interest groups has evolved from a focus on small-N studies to larger-N studies in the past 15 years. While both European and American research has become more sophisticated and aware of methodological aspects, there is yet no specialized literature on methods regarding how to study interest groups. Only few studies discuss the methodological implications of interest group studies, as well as the transferability of methods employed in…

  • Framing processes and lobbying in EU foreign policy: Case study and process-tracing methods

    Open Access•Benedetta Voltolini, Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•European Political Science•2016•Cited by: 7•References: 26

    This article discusses the potential of case study and process-tracing methods for studying lobbying and framing in the European Union (EU). It argues that case studies and process tracing allow us to explore different sets of questions than large-N and quantitative approaches and to shed light on the mechanisms that contribute to policy change. Through these methods it is possible to study long-term processes and under-researched areas, to analy…

  • Selektive Abwanderung im EU-Verbandssystem. Das Strategierepertoire unzufriedener Mitglieder

    Open Access•Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft•2016•Cited by: 2•References: 14

  • National interest organisations in EU policy-making

    Rainer Eising, Daniel Rasch et al.•ARTICLE•West European Politics•2017•Cited by: 8•References: 37

    Comparative and EU interest group studies are marked by a progression towards theory-driven, large-N empirical studies in the past 20 years. With the study of national interest organisations in EU policy-making, this special issue puts centre stage a theoretically and empirically neglected topic in this research field. The individual contributions include interest group characteristics, institutional contexts as well as issue contexts as explanat…

  • Imperfect public goods and the logic of selective exit in EU interest organisations

    Rainer Eising•ARTICLE•West European Politics•2017•Cited by: 4•References: 23

    How do national members react to performance failures of EU-level interest groups? Albert Hirschman suggested two responses: exit and voice. Building on this distinction, the article develops the category of selective exit which denotes members' interest representation outside the boundaries of the EU-level interest organisation in response to performance failures. Selective exit enables members to raise voice from within and exert pressure from …

  • Who says what to whom? Alignments and arguments in EU policy-making

    Rainer Eising, Daniel Rasch et al.•ARTICLE•West European Politics•2017•Cited by: 17•References: 40

    In the EU multilevel polity, domestic interest groups seek to shape EU legislation by accessing both national and EU institutions. Previous studies indicated that institutional and issue contexts as well as organisational characteristics shape their strategies of interest representation. However, we know much less about how alignments and arguments impact on their participation in EU and national policy consultations. Addressing this gap, we inve…

  • The More, the Merrier? Interest Groups and Legislative Change in the Public Hearings of the German Parliamentary Committees

    Rainer Eising, Florian Spohr•ARTICLE•German Politics•2017•Cited by: 30

    The article examines the impact of organised interests on the passage of legislation in the German Bundestag through an empirical analysis of the position papers presented in the public hearings of its standing committees in 2011. These committees are the most important forums to revise legislative proposals. Drawing on resource dependency theory, we employ GLM regression analyses to study if interest groups act as change agents that bring legisl…

  • Uncovering interest group participation in Germany: Web collection of written statements in ministries and the parliament

    Open Access•Daniel Rasch, Florian Spohr et al.•ARTICLE•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2020•Cited by: 3•References: 23

    This article discusses web collection of interest group statements on bills as a data source. Written statements allow the identification of actors active in policy-making as well as those actors’ positions, lobbying coalitions and issue saliency. These data also can contribute to the measurement of interest groups’ influence on legislation. Taking web collection from the German parliament’s and ministries’ web pages as an example, we demonstrate…

  • Business interests, public interests, and experts in parliamentary committees: Their impact on legislative amendments in the German Bundestag

    James P Cro, James P Cross et al.•ARTICLE•West European Politics•2021•Cited by: 20•References: 34

    This study examines the evolving role of parliamentary committees in legislative decision-making and their relationships with external actors when amending bills. Drawing on resource dependence theory and informational perspectives on parliamentary committees, we analyse the impact of information provided by business interest organizations, public interest groups, and experts in the German Bundestag's public hearings in 2004, 2007, and 2011. Usin…

Political science (23 works) · Law (19 works) · Law (18 works) · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (18 works) · Economics (17 works) · Politics (17 works) · European Union Policy and Governance (15 works) · Interest group (12 works) · Political economy (9 works) · Public Administration (9 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae