Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Karina Mro

Biographic Data

ID4376573
NAMEKarina Mro
GIVEN NAMESKarina
FAMILY NAMEMro
SIGNATUREMRO K
AFFILIATIONSGerman Institute of Development and Sustainability
ORCID0000-0001-5111-1366
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS10
TOTAL CITATIONS44
WORKS AS AUTHOR10
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2018
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2025
H-INDEX3
  • Social Cohesion

    Open Access•F Burchi, Charlotte Fiedler et al.•ARTICLE•Social Indicators Research•2025•References: 24

    Social cohesion is crucial to increasing societies’ resilience to shocks and to enabling sustainable futures. Amidst growing tensions and polarization in all world regions, social cohesion ranks high on the agendas of researchers, decision-makers and international organizations. Despite the strong interest in the topic, there are major constraints to understanding its patterns, causes and effects: the lack of a common conceptualization and measur…

  • Strategic responses to autocratization in international democracy promotion

    Open Access•Julia Leininger, Karina Mro et al.•ARTICLE•Democratization•2025•Cited by: 3•References: 31

  • Democracy promotion in times of autocratization

    Open Access•Sonja Grimm, Brigitte Weiffen et al.•ARTICLE•Democratization•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 73

  • Democratization and Peace after Civil War—What Difference Can International Engagement Make? Insights from Liberia

    Open Access•Karina Mro•ARTICLE•International Studies Perspectives•2024•References: 29

    What role can international engagement play for the relationship between post-conflict democratization and conflict recurrence? Empirical evidence indicates that democratization risks triggering violence. Consequently, some scholars criticize the liberal peacebuilding approach, which centers on the promotion of democracy and competitive elections with the aim of fostering peace after civil wars. This article (1) illustrates the risks and potentia…

  • Covid-19 and Political Trust in Local Governments

    Open Access•Charlotte Fiedler, Hugo Marcos-Marne et al.•ARTICLE•Political Studies Review•2024•Cited by: 2•References: 65

    The COVID-19 pandemic has reinvigorated debates about the drivers of political trust. Research so far has mainly focused on national-level institutions, during the early stages of the pandemic and using data from established democracies. However, how does this relationship look like if we pay attention to subnational institutions in non-consolidated democracies, and further away from the initial COVID-19 outbreak? To contribute to this line of re…

  • Dealing With the Past for a Peaceful Future? Analysing the Effect of Transitional Justice Instruments on Trust in Postconflict Societies

    Open Access•Charlotte Fiedler, Karina Mro et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of…•2023•Cited by: 1•References: 9

    Can dealing with a history of violent conflict through transitional justice help to rebuild social trust? Addressing three gaps in the current literature, we (1) analyse the effect of transitional justice on social trust, thereby going beyond the predominant focus on renewed violence; (2) use novel, handcoded data to take donor support for transitional justice into account, a relevant but mostly overlooked factor; and (3) systematically investiga…

  • Identifying Pathways to Peace

    Open Access•Karina Mro, Charlotte Fiedler et al.•ARTICLE•International Studies Quarterly•2022•Cited by: 15•References: 55

    This article provides new evidence on how the international community can effectively foster peace after civil war. It expands the current literature's narrow focus on either peacekeeping or aggregated aid flows, adopting a comprehensive, yet disaggregated, view on international peacebuilding efforts. We distinguish five areas of peacebuilding support (peacekeeping, nonmilitary security support, support for politics and governance, for socioecono…

  • Disaggregating democracy aid to explain peaceful democratisation after civil wars

    Open Access•Karina Mro•ARTICLE•European Journal of International…•2021•Cited by: 3•References: 14

    Democratisation is hailed as a pathway to peace by some, yet, blamed for provoking renewed violence by others. Can democracy aid explain the effect of democratisation after civil war? Building upon findings that transitions to democracy are prone to violence, this article shows that external democracy aid can mitigate such negative effects. It is the first to disaggregate democracy aid and analyse its effect on peace after civil war. To this end,…

  • Gradual, Cooperative, Coordinated

    Open Access•Charlotte Fiedler, Jörn Grävingholt et al.•ARTICLE•International Studies Perspectives•2019•Cited by: 9•References: 38

    This article analyzes the success factors for external engagement aimed at fostering peace in conflict-affected states. It focuses on a set of three factors that have been under-researched so far: the strategic prioritization between stability and democracy, the degree of coordination, and the mode of interaction. We compare international engagement in six countries—Burundi, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Nepal, Senegal, and Timor-Leste. These countries all …

  • First Peace, then Democracy? Evaluating Strategies of International Support at Critical Junctures after Civil War

    Open Access•Karina Mro•ARTICLE•International Peacekeeping•2018•Cited by: 10•References: 29

    Existing research suggests that democratization can run counter to building peace in post-conflict contexts. This article analyses the effect of two competing strategies that external actors use to address the conflict of objective between democracy and peace: prioritization and gradualism. The prioritization approach advises sequencing, which means postponing support for democratization and concentrating first on peace in terms of the absence of…

  • Identifying Pathways to Peace

    Open Access•Karina Mro, Charlotte Fiedler et al.•ARTICLE•International Studies Quarterly•2022•Cited by: 15•References: 55

    This article provides new evidence on how the international community can effectively foster peace after civil war. It expands the current literature's narrow focus on either peacekeeping or aggregated aid flows, adopting a comprehensive, yet disaggregated, view on international peacebuilding efforts. We distinguish five areas of peacebuilding support (peacekeeping, nonmilitary security support, support for politics and governance, for socioecono…

  • First Peace, then Democracy? Evaluating Strategies of International Support at Critical Junctures after Civil War

    Open Access•Karina Mro•ARTICLE•International Peacekeeping•2018•Cited by: 10•References: 29

    Existing research suggests that democratization can run counter to building peace in post-conflict contexts. This article analyses the effect of two competing strategies that external actors use to address the conflict of objective between democracy and peace: prioritization and gradualism. The prioritization approach advises sequencing, which means postponing support for democratization and concentrating first on peace in terms of the absence of…

  • Gradual, Cooperative, Coordinated

    Open Access•Charlotte Fiedler, Jörn Grävingholt et al.•ARTICLE•International Studies Perspectives•2019•Cited by: 9•References: 38

    This article analyzes the success factors for external engagement aimed at fostering peace in conflict-affected states. It focuses on a set of three factors that have been under-researched so far: the strategic prioritization between stability and democracy, the degree of coordination, and the mode of interaction. We compare international engagement in six countries—Burundi, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Nepal, Senegal, and Timor-Leste. These countries all …

  • Strategic responses to autocratization in international democracy promotion

    Open Access•Julia Leininger, Karina Mro et al.•ARTICLE•Democratization•2025•Cited by: 3•References: 31

  • Disaggregating democracy aid to explain peaceful democratisation after civil wars

    Open Access•Karina Mro•ARTICLE•European Journal of International…•2021•Cited by: 3•References: 14

    Democratisation is hailed as a pathway to peace by some, yet, blamed for provoking renewed violence by others. Can democracy aid explain the effect of democratisation after civil war? Building upon findings that transitions to democracy are prone to violence, this article shows that external democracy aid can mitigate such negative effects. It is the first to disaggregate democracy aid and analyse its effect on peace after civil war. To this end,…

  • Covid-19 and Political Trust in Local Governments

    Open Access•Charlotte Fiedler, Hugo Marcos-Marne et al.•ARTICLE•Political Studies Review•2024•Cited by: 2•References: 65

    The COVID-19 pandemic has reinvigorated debates about the drivers of political trust. Research so far has mainly focused on national-level institutions, during the early stages of the pandemic and using data from established democracies. However, how does this relationship look like if we pay attention to subnational institutions in non-consolidated democracies, and further away from the initial COVID-19 outbreak? To contribute to this line of re…

  • Democracy promotion in times of autocratization

    Open Access•Sonja Grimm, Brigitte Weiffen et al.•ARTICLE•Democratization•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 73

  • Dealing With the Past for a Peaceful Future? Analysing the Effect of Transitional Justice Instruments on Trust in Postconflict Societies

    Open Access•Charlotte Fiedler, Karina Mro et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of…•2023•Cited by: 1•References: 9

    Can dealing with a history of violent conflict through transitional justice help to rebuild social trust? Addressing three gaps in the current literature, we (1) analyse the effect of transitional justice on social trust, thereby going beyond the predominant focus on renewed violence; (2) use novel, handcoded data to take donor support for transitional justice into account, a relevant but mostly overlooked factor; and (3) systematically investiga…

  • First Peace, then Democracy? Evaluating Strategies of International Support at Critical Junctures after Civil War

    Open Access•Karina Mro•ARTICLE•International Peacekeeping•2018•Cited by: 10•References: 29

    Existing research suggests that democratization can run counter to building peace in post-conflict contexts. This article analyses the effect of two competing strategies that external actors use to address the conflict of objective between democracy and peace: prioritization and gradualism. The prioritization approach advises sequencing, which means postponing support for democratization and concentrating first on peace in terms of the absence of…

  • Gradual, Cooperative, Coordinated

    Open Access•Charlotte Fiedler, Jörn Grävingholt et al.•ARTICLE•International Studies Perspectives•2019•Cited by: 9•References: 38

    This article analyzes the success factors for external engagement aimed at fostering peace in conflict-affected states. It focuses on a set of three factors that have been under-researched so far: the strategic prioritization between stability and democracy, the degree of coordination, and the mode of interaction. We compare international engagement in six countries—Burundi, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Nepal, Senegal, and Timor-Leste. These countries all …

  • Disaggregating democracy aid to explain peaceful democratisation after civil wars

    Open Access•Karina Mro•ARTICLE•European Journal of International…•2021•Cited by: 3•References: 14

    Democratisation is hailed as a pathway to peace by some, yet, blamed for provoking renewed violence by others. Can democracy aid explain the effect of democratisation after civil war? Building upon findings that transitions to democracy are prone to violence, this article shows that external democracy aid can mitigate such negative effects. It is the first to disaggregate democracy aid and analyse its effect on peace after civil war. To this end,…

  • Identifying Pathways to Peace

    Open Access•Karina Mro, Charlotte Fiedler et al.•ARTICLE•International Studies Quarterly•2022•Cited by: 15•References: 55

    This article provides new evidence on how the international community can effectively foster peace after civil war. It expands the current literature's narrow focus on either peacekeeping or aggregated aid flows, adopting a comprehensive, yet disaggregated, view on international peacebuilding efforts. We distinguish five areas of peacebuilding support (peacekeeping, nonmilitary security support, support for politics and governance, for socioecono…

  • Dealing With the Past for a Peaceful Future? Analysing the Effect of Transitional Justice Instruments on Trust in Postconflict Societies

    Open Access•Charlotte Fiedler, Karina Mro et al.•ARTICLE•International Journal of…•2023•Cited by: 1•References: 9

    Can dealing with a history of violent conflict through transitional justice help to rebuild social trust? Addressing three gaps in the current literature, we (1) analyse the effect of transitional justice on social trust, thereby going beyond the predominant focus on renewed violence; (2) use novel, handcoded data to take donor support for transitional justice into account, a relevant but mostly overlooked factor; and (3) systematically investiga…

  • Democratization and Peace after Civil War—What Difference Can International Engagement Make? Insights from Liberia

    Open Access•Karina Mro•ARTICLE•International Studies Perspectives•2024•References: 29

    What role can international engagement play for the relationship between post-conflict democratization and conflict recurrence? Empirical evidence indicates that democratization risks triggering violence. Consequently, some scholars criticize the liberal peacebuilding approach, which centers on the promotion of democracy and competitive elections with the aim of fostering peace after civil wars. This article (1) illustrates the risks and potentia…

  • Covid-19 and Political Trust in Local Governments

    Open Access•Charlotte Fiedler, Hugo Marcos-Marne et al.•ARTICLE•Political Studies Review•2024•Cited by: 2•References: 65

    The COVID-19 pandemic has reinvigorated debates about the drivers of political trust. Research so far has mainly focused on national-level institutions, during the early stages of the pandemic and using data from established democracies. However, how does this relationship look like if we pay attention to subnational institutions in non-consolidated democracies, and further away from the initial COVID-19 outbreak? To contribute to this line of re…

  • Social Cohesion

    Open Access•F Burchi, Charlotte Fiedler et al.•ARTICLE•Social Indicators Research•2025•References: 24

    Social cohesion is crucial to increasing societies’ resilience to shocks and to enabling sustainable futures. Amidst growing tensions and polarization in all world regions, social cohesion ranks high on the agendas of researchers, decision-makers and international organizations. Despite the strong interest in the topic, there are major constraints to understanding its patterns, causes and effects: the lack of a common conceptualization and measur…

  • Strategic responses to autocratization in international democracy promotion

    Open Access•Julia Leininger, Karina Mro et al.•ARTICLE•Democratization•2025•Cited by: 3•References: 31

  • Democracy promotion in times of autocratization

    Open Access•Sonja Grimm, Brigitte Weiffen et al.•ARTICLE•Democratization•2025•Cited by: 1•References: 73

Law (8 works) · Political Conflict and Governance (8 works) · Political science (8 works) · Sociology (8 works) · Peacebuilding and International Security (7 works) · Political economy (7 works) · Politics (7 works) · Democracy (5 works) · Democratization (5 works) · International Development and Aid (5 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae