David Crabtree
Biographic Data
| ID | 4376593 |
|---|---|
| NAME | David Crabtree |
| GIVEN NAMES | David |
| FAMILY NAME | Crabtree |
| SIGNATURE | CRABTREE D |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Chicago |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-7340-4442 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 17 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 4 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 1947 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2025 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Can unamendable term limits prevent presidents-for-life
Who deserves what and why during the Covid ‐19 pandemic
How does the public decide who is deserving of welfare benefits? To shed light on this question, we investigate whether the CARIN principles of deservingness—specifically the ideas of control, attitude, reciprocity, identity, and need—impact the public's perception of American welfare target groups. We draw contrast between traditional welfare programs and pandemic‐related programs to gain a more comparative understanding of the principles' effec…
Examining policy feedback effects from Covid-19 on social welfare support
Can experience with one set of policies result in support for a set of different, but related, policies? To show how this is possible, we develop a new dimension of policy feedback effects missing from prior studies – outcome distance. We then examine what we call a middle-distance outcome and apply this concept to the case of welfare attitudes in the United States. A novel counterfactual survey design is used to estimate the within-subject effec…
Red squill—most specific of the raticides
Examining policy feedback effects from Covid-19 on social welfare support
Can experience with one set of policies result in support for a set of different, but related, policies? To show how this is possible, we develop a new dimension of policy feedback effects missing from prior studies – outcome distance. We then examine what we call a middle-distance outcome and apply this concept to the case of welfare attitudes in the United States. A novel counterfactual survey design is used to estimate the within-subject effec…
Who deserves what and why during the Covid ‐19 pandemic
How does the public decide who is deserving of welfare benefits? To shed light on this question, we investigate whether the CARIN principles of deservingness—specifically the ideas of control, attitude, reciprocity, identity, and need—impact the public's perception of American welfare target groups. We draw contrast between traditional welfare programs and pandemic‐related programs to gain a more comparative understanding of the principles' effec…
Red squill—most specific of the raticides
Red squill—most specific of the raticides
Who deserves what and why during the Covid ‐19 pandemic
How does the public decide who is deserving of welfare benefits? To shed light on this question, we investigate whether the CARIN principles of deservingness—specifically the ideas of control, attitude, reciprocity, identity, and need—impact the public's perception of American welfare target groups. We draw contrast between traditional welfare programs and pandemic‐related programs to gain a more comparative understanding of the principles' effec…
Examining policy feedback effects from Covid-19 on social welfare support
Can experience with one set of policies result in support for a set of different, but related, policies? To show how this is possible, we develop a new dimension of policy feedback effects missing from prior studies – outcome distance. We then examine what we call a middle-distance outcome and apply this concept to the case of welfare attitudes in the United States. A novel counterfactual survey design is used to estimate the within-subject effec…
Can unamendable term limits prevent presidents-for-life
Political science (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 (2 works) · Employment and Welfare Studies (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Medicine (2 works) · Pandemic (2 works) · Welfare (2 works) · 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak (1 works)