Ragnhild Elise Brinchmann Johansen
Biographic Data
| ID | 4377404 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Ragnhild Elise Brinchmann Johansen |
| GIVEN NAMES | Ragnhild Elise Brinchmann |
| FAMILY NAME | Johansen |
| SIGNATURE | JOHANSEN R E B |
| AFFILIATIONS | Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 6 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 2 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2020 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Sexually destroyed or empowered? Silencing female genital cutting in close relationships
Based on fieldwork among Kurdish-Norwegian migrants, this study explored how female genital cutting (FGC) was a silenced topic between mothers and daughters, and between men and women. The silence was often broken when FGC was discussed as a practice that needed to be rejected. The main reasons for rejecting FGC were to support women's rights and to recognise the negative ways in which FGC affected women's sexuality. This way of breaking the sile…
Why did I circumcise him?’ Unexpected comparisons to male circumcision in a qualitative study on female genital cutting among Kurdish–Norwegians
Based on fieldwork that aimed to gather more knowledge on female genital cutting among Kurdish–Norwegians, in this article we report on how research participants would often talk about male circumcision instead. Informed by current scholarship and public discourse on female genital cutting and male circumcision, we identified three themes when analysing how and why the participants would talk about male circumcision rather than female genital cut…
Why did I circumcise him?’ Unexpected comparisons to male circumcision in a qualitative study on female genital cutting among Kurdish–Norwegians
Based on fieldwork that aimed to gather more knowledge on female genital cutting among Kurdish–Norwegians, in this article we report on how research participants would often talk about male circumcision instead. Informed by current scholarship and public discourse on female genital cutting and male circumcision, we identified three themes when analysing how and why the participants would talk about male circumcision rather than female genital cut…
Why did I circumcise him?’ Unexpected comparisons to male circumcision in a qualitative study on female genital cutting among Kurdish–Norwegians
Based on fieldwork that aimed to gather more knowledge on female genital cutting among Kurdish–Norwegians, in this article we report on how research participants would often talk about male circumcision instead. Informed by current scholarship and public discourse on female genital cutting and male circumcision, we identified three themes when analysing how and why the participants would talk about male circumcision rather than female genital cut…
Sexually destroyed or empowered? Silencing female genital cutting in close relationships
Based on fieldwork among Kurdish-Norwegian migrants, this study explored how female genital cutting (FGC) was a silenced topic between mothers and daughters, and between men and women. The silence was often broken when FGC was discussed as a practice that needed to be rejected. The main reasons for rejecting FGC were to support women's rights and to recognise the negative ways in which FGC affected women's sexuality. This way of breaking the sile…
Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues (2 works) · Gender Studies (2 works) · Gender Studies (2 works) · Genital Health and Disease (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Norwegian (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Sociology (2 works)