Sarah-Michelle Nienhau
Biographic Data
| ID | 4378738 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Sarah-Michelle Nienhau |
| GIVEN NAMES | Sarah-Michelle |
| FAMILY NAME | Nienhau |
| SIGNATURE | NIENHAU S |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-1130-5286 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 2 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 2 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2021 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Framing the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Comparison of Political and Media Framing During the First Three Waves in Germany
The study focuses on the framing of the COVID-19 pandemic in German parliamentary debates and media reports. It concentrates on the first three pandemic waves. The goal is not only to compare political and media framing, but also to show how frames changed from wave to wave. A content analysis of plenary protocols and articles from Welt Online and SZ Online has been carried out, coding single frame elements instead of complete frames, which are i…
Different Arenas, Different Deliberative Quality? Using a Systemic Framework to Evaluate Online Deliberation on Immigration Policy in Germany
One major strand of contemporary research on political participation addresses online deliberation. Over time, online deliberation has become increasingly pluralistic. Our study applies a framework derived from systemic deliberative theory to evaluate different online deliberation processes on German immigration policy. A crucial premise of the systemic deliberative theory is that the quality of deliberation varies systematically between differen…
Framing the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Comparison of Political and Media Framing During the First Three Waves in Germany
The study focuses on the framing of the COVID-19 pandemic in German parliamentary debates and media reports. It concentrates on the first three pandemic waves. The goal is not only to compare political and media framing, but also to show how frames changed from wave to wave. A content analysis of plenary protocols and articles from Welt Online and SZ Online has been carried out, coding single frame elements instead of complete frames, which are i…
Different Arenas, Different Deliberative Quality? Using a Systemic Framework to Evaluate Online Deliberation on Immigration Policy in Germany
One major strand of contemporary research on political participation addresses online deliberation. Over time, online deliberation has become increasingly pluralistic. Our study applies a framework derived from systemic deliberative theory to evaluate different online deliberation processes on German immigration policy. A crucial premise of the systemic deliberative theory is that the quality of deliberation varies systematically between differen…
Framing the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Comparison of Political and Media Framing During the First Three Waves in Germany
The study focuses on the framing of the COVID-19 pandemic in German parliamentary debates and media reports. It concentrates on the first three pandemic waves. The goal is not only to compare political and media framing, but also to show how frames changed from wave to wave. A content analysis of plenary protocols and articles from Welt Online and SZ Online has been carried out, coding single frame elements instead of complete frames, which are i…
Law (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Politics (2 works) · Social Media and Politics (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 (1 works) · Deliberation (1 works) · Deliberative democracy (1 works) · Democracy (1 works) · Electoral Systems and Political Participation (1 works)