Jungsub Shin
Biographic Data
| ID | 4380988 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Jungsub Shin |
| GIVEN NAMES | Jungsub |
| FAMILY NAME | Shin |
| SIGNATURE | SHIN J |
| AFFILIATIONS | Soongsil University |
| ORCID | 0000-0001-8573-1168 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 6 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 17 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 6 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2016 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 3 |
Party membership motivations and political activism in a polarized new democracy
This study investigates party membership motivations in South Korea, a highly polarized new democracy, and how they distinctively shape intra-party and campaign participation. Using survey data from 1,410 Democratic and People Power Party members, we evaluate the General Incentives Model alongside negative partisan motivation. Results show that while altruism is the primary reason for joining, higher affective polarization significantly intensifi…
Public Support for Government and Leaders during the Covid-19 Crisis
This paper investigates how COVID-19 anxiety and public evaluations of government crisis management relate to executive approval rates and trust in government in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Contrary to expectations from previous studies, we find no significant relationship between COVID-19 anxiety and changes in trust or executive approval. However, there is a consistent positive association between citizens’ evaluations of their government’s…
Who is responsible? The effect of clarity of responsibility on voter turnout
Does voters’ ability to discern who is responsible for policy outcomes affect voter turnout? Although particular institutional arrangements which influence this ability – known as clarity of responsibility – appear to affect how voters form retrospective judgements, existing literature is less informed about its role on voter turnout. This article argues that voters tend to turn out less if they cannot discern who is responsible for policy outcom…
Do the welfare benefits weaken the economic vote? A cross-national analysis of the welfare state and economic voting
Comparative economic voting studies have found great instability in economic voting across countries and over time. In explaining this instability, we highlight the role of welfare systems because strong welfare protection attenuates voters’ incentives to base their vote on government economic performance. By analyzing 174 legislature elections in 31 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries from 1980 to 2010 and by …
Comprehensive Retrospective Voting in Mixed Electoral Systems
Performance-based retrospective voting is a fundamental mechanism of democracy. A good deal of scholarship has examined this electoral mechanism, but the extant studies have two omissions. First, there is little research that considers several retrospective evaluations together using an incumbent voting model. Second, there is little research that examines the difference in the effects of voters’ retrospective evaluations on two different ballots…
The Consequences of Government Ideology and Taxation on Welfare Voting
Welfare spending has grown considerably and is currently a core component of government expenditure in most advanced countries. Although a good deal of scholarship assumes that benefiting from welfare spending increases the likelihood of voting for the incumbent parties, the impact of general welfare spending on incumbent parties’ electoral success has received scant attention. Moreover, we do not have much evidence regarding the conditions under…
Who is responsible? The effect of clarity of responsibility on voter turnout
Does voters’ ability to discern who is responsible for policy outcomes affect voter turnout? Although particular institutional arrangements which influence this ability – known as clarity of responsibility – appear to affect how voters form retrospective judgements, existing literature is less informed about its role on voter turnout. This article argues that voters tend to turn out less if they cannot discern who is responsible for policy outcom…
The Consequences of Government Ideology and Taxation on Welfare Voting
Welfare spending has grown considerably and is currently a core component of government expenditure in most advanced countries. Although a good deal of scholarship assumes that benefiting from welfare spending increases the likelihood of voting for the incumbent parties, the impact of general welfare spending on incumbent parties’ electoral success has received scant attention. Moreover, we do not have much evidence regarding the conditions under…
Do the welfare benefits weaken the economic vote? A cross-national analysis of the welfare state and economic voting
Comparative economic voting studies have found great instability in economic voting across countries and over time. In explaining this instability, we highlight the role of welfare systems because strong welfare protection attenuates voters’ incentives to base their vote on government economic performance. By analyzing 174 legislature elections in 31 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries from 1980 to 2010 and by …
The Consequences of Government Ideology and Taxation on Welfare Voting
Welfare spending has grown considerably and is currently a core component of government expenditure in most advanced countries. Although a good deal of scholarship assumes that benefiting from welfare spending increases the likelihood of voting for the incumbent parties, the impact of general welfare spending on incumbent parties’ electoral success has received scant attention. Moreover, we do not have much evidence regarding the conditions under…
Comprehensive Retrospective Voting in Mixed Electoral Systems
Performance-based retrospective voting is a fundamental mechanism of democracy. A good deal of scholarship has examined this electoral mechanism, but the extant studies have two omissions. First, there is little research that considers several retrospective evaluations together using an incumbent voting model. Second, there is little research that examines the difference in the effects of voters’ retrospective evaluations on two different ballots…
Who is responsible? The effect of clarity of responsibility on voter turnout
Does voters’ ability to discern who is responsible for policy outcomes affect voter turnout? Although particular institutional arrangements which influence this ability – known as clarity of responsibility – appear to affect how voters form retrospective judgements, existing literature is less informed about its role on voter turnout. This article argues that voters tend to turn out less if they cannot discern who is responsible for policy outcom…
Do the welfare benefits weaken the economic vote? A cross-national analysis of the welfare state and economic voting
Comparative economic voting studies have found great instability in economic voting across countries and over time. In explaining this instability, we highlight the role of welfare systems because strong welfare protection attenuates voters’ incentives to base their vote on government economic performance. By analyzing 174 legislature elections in 31 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries from 1980 to 2010 and by …
Public Support for Government and Leaders during the Covid-19 Crisis
This paper investigates how COVID-19 anxiety and public evaluations of government crisis management relate to executive approval rates and trust in government in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. Contrary to expectations from previous studies, we find no significant relationship between COVID-19 anxiety and changes in trust or executive approval. However, there is a consistent positive association between citizens’ evaluations of their government’s…
Party membership motivations and political activism in a polarized new democracy
This study investigates party membership motivations in South Korea, a highly polarized new democracy, and how they distinctively shape intra-party and campaign participation. Using survey data from 1,410 Democratic and People Power Party members, we evaluate the General Incentives Model alongside negative partisan motivation. Results show that while altruism is the primary reason for joining, higher affective polarization significantly intensifi…
Electoral Systems and Political Participation (6 works) · Economics (5 works) · Political science (5 works) · Politics (5 works) · Law (4 works) · Voting (4 works) · Democracy (3 works) · Government (linguistics (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Public economics (3 works)