Nick Henderson
Biographic Data
| ID | 4382945 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Nick Henderson |
| GIVEN NAMES | Nick |
| FAMILY NAME | Henderson |
| SIGNATURE | HENDERSON N |
| AFFILIATIONS | Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA |
| VERIFIED | No |
| TOTAL WORKS | 2 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 7 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 2 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2016 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| H-INDEX | 2 |
Repression and Dissent: How Tit-for-Tat Leads to Violent and Nonviolent Resistance
Much research examines the state-dissident nexus by large-n studies and rational choice theories. This article contributes an analysis of dissident reasoning through a computational evaluation of ethnographic interviews. The analysis shows that dissident decision-making is based on tit-for-tat deliberations: Dissidents choose violent means primarily in response to violent repression, and nonviolent means in response to nonviolent repression. Ordi…
A Computational Model of Cognitive Maps: Analyzing Violent and Nonviolent Activity in Egypt and Germany
Why do some individuals pick up arms as opposed to others who live under the same conditions? Environmental and group theories fail to differentiate between these individuals. In response, we apply the cognitive mapping approach and model violence as decisions based on chains of beliefs about various types of factors, including state aggression, access to violent groups, religion, and personal characteristics. Based on a double-paired comparison,…
A Computational Model of Cognitive Maps: Analyzing Violent and Nonviolent Activity in Egypt and Germany
Why do some individuals pick up arms as opposed to others who live under the same conditions? Environmental and group theories fail to differentiate between these individuals. In response, we apply the cognitive mapping approach and model violence as decisions based on chains of beliefs about various types of factors, including state aggression, access to violent groups, religion, and personal characteristics. Based on a double-paired comparison,…
Repression and Dissent: How Tit-for-Tat Leads to Violent and Nonviolent Resistance
Much research examines the state-dissident nexus by large-n studies and rational choice theories. This article contributes an analysis of dissident reasoning through a computational evaluation of ethnographic interviews. The analysis shows that dissident decision-making is based on tit-for-tat deliberations: Dissidents choose violent means primarily in response to violent repression, and nonviolent means in response to nonviolent repression. Ordi…
A Computational Model of Cognitive Maps: Analyzing Violent and Nonviolent Activity in Egypt and Germany
Why do some individuals pick up arms as opposed to others who live under the same conditions? Environmental and group theories fail to differentiate between these individuals. In response, we apply the cognitive mapping approach and model violence as decisions based on chains of beliefs about various types of factors, including state aggression, access to violent groups, religion, and personal characteristics. Based on a double-paired comparison,…
Repression and Dissent: How Tit-for-Tat Leads to Violent and Nonviolent Resistance
Much research examines the state-dissident nexus by large-n studies and rational choice theories. This article contributes an analysis of dissident reasoning through a computational evaluation of ethnographic interviews. The analysis shows that dissident decision-making is based on tit-for-tat deliberations: Dissidents choose violent means primarily in response to violent repression, and nonviolent means in response to nonviolent repression. Ordi…
Law (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Political science (2 works) · Politics (2 works) · Psychology (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works) · Social Psychology (2 works) · Sociology (2 works) · State (computer science (2 works) · Aggression (1 works)