George Asiamah
Biographic Data
| ID | 4383932 |
|---|---|
| NAME | George Asiamah |
| GIVEN NAMES | George |
| FAMILY NAME | Asiamah |
| SIGNATURE | ASIAMAH G |
| AFFILIATIONS | University of Sheffield |
| ORCID | 0000-0002-2986-8570 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 5 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 1 |
| WORKS AS AUTHOR | 5 |
| WORKS AS EDITOR | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2024 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Legally robust, politically fragile? The discursive institutional dilution of conservative climate discourse in UK Net Zero politics (2010–2024)
The Conservative Party governed the UK during 2010–2024; a period which included several flagship climate actions as well as rollbacks under austerity. To date, however, limited attention has been paid to how discourses and institutions co-evolve, and how narrative strategies shape the meaning and durability of legal commitments. This article examines the evolution of UK climate governance from 2010 to 2024 by introducing a new conceptual process…
Asymmetric Regulatory Embeddedness and Post‐Brexit Governance
Why has the United Kingdom repeatedly restored substantive compatibility with European Union (EU) regulatory norms despite formal withdrawal? This article introduces the concept of asymmetric regulatory embeddedness (ARE) to explain post‐membership governance in highly integrated sectors. ARE captures the structural condition in which a former member state remains economically, institutionally and infrastructurally embedded within a dominant regu…
To Ban or Not to Ban
This article applies the Multiple Streams Framework (MSF) to examine post‐Brexit antimicrobial resistance (AMR) governance in UK agriculture, focusing on the contested regulation of prophylactic antibiotic use in farm animals. The study reveals how Brexit created a structural policy window, yet political and ideological dynamics rendered it functionally ineffective. While the problem and policy streams were well developed—supported by strong scie…
Political rhetoric vs practical reality of ‘Taking Back Control
In the vortex of the Brexit discourse, the phrase 'taking back control' emerged as a resonant mantra, encapsulating a desire for enhanced sovereignty and self-direction. Despite its widespread usage and political importance, the phrase's practical implications remain underexplored in academic literature. This study introduces a novel analytical framework that conceptualises the notion of taking back control as an outcome of de-Europeanisation and…
Divorced but co-habiting
Political rhetoric vs practical reality of ‘Taking Back Control
In the vortex of the Brexit discourse, the phrase 'taking back control' emerged as a resonant mantra, encapsulating a desire for enhanced sovereignty and self-direction. Despite its widespread usage and political importance, the phrase's practical implications remain underexplored in academic literature. This study introduces a novel analytical framework that conceptualises the notion of taking back control as an outcome of de-Europeanisation and…
Divorced but co-habiting
To Ban or Not to Ban
This article applies the Multiple Streams Framework (MSF) to examine post‐Brexit antimicrobial resistance (AMR) governance in UK agriculture, focusing on the contested regulation of prophylactic antibiotic use in farm animals. The study reveals how Brexit created a structural policy window, yet political and ideological dynamics rendered it functionally ineffective. While the problem and policy streams were well developed—supported by strong scie…
Political rhetoric vs practical reality of ‘Taking Back Control
In the vortex of the Brexit discourse, the phrase 'taking back control' emerged as a resonant mantra, encapsulating a desire for enhanced sovereignty and self-direction. Despite its widespread usage and political importance, the phrase's practical implications remain underexplored in academic literature. This study introduces a novel analytical framework that conceptualises the notion of taking back control as an outcome of de-Europeanisation and…
Legally robust, politically fragile? The discursive institutional dilution of conservative climate discourse in UK Net Zero politics (2010–2024)
The Conservative Party governed the UK during 2010–2024; a period which included several flagship climate actions as well as rollbacks under austerity. To date, however, limited attention has been paid to how discourses and institutions co-evolve, and how narrative strategies shape the meaning and durability of legal commitments. This article examines the evolution of UK climate governance from 2010 to 2024 by introducing a new conceptual process…
Asymmetric Regulatory Embeddedness and Post‐Brexit Governance
Why has the United Kingdom repeatedly restored substantive compatibility with European Union (EU) regulatory norms despite formal withdrawal? This article introduces the concept of asymmetric regulatory embeddedness (ARE) to explain post‐membership governance in highly integrated sectors. ARE captures the structural condition in which a former member state remains economically, institutionally and infrastructurally embedded within a dominant regu…
Corporate governance (3 works) · European union (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Autonomy (2 works) · Brexit (2 works) · Economics (2 works) · European Union Policy and Governance (2 works) · Europeanisation (2 works) · Global Financial Regulation and Crises (2 works) · Ideology (2 works)