Johanna Pettersson Fürst
Biographic Data
| ID | 4383936 |
|---|---|
| NAME | Johanna Pettersson Fürst |
| GIVEN NAMES | Johanna Pettersson |
| FAMILY NAME | Fürst |
| SIGNATURE | FÜRST J P |
| AFFILIATIONS | Uppsala University |
| ORCID | 0000-0003-3866-7962 |
| VERIFIED | Yes |
| TOTAL WORKS | 4 |
| TOTAL CITATIONS | 6 |
| AUTHOR COUNT | 4 |
| EDITOR COUNT | 0 |
| FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2023 |
| LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR | 2026 |
| H-INDEX | 1 |
Competing Ethoses in Swedish Higher Education and Research
Academic freedom is essential for higher education and research. The ethos of the academic profession and the ability to exercise it depend not only on autonomy from external influences, such as political control, but also on individual and collegial autonomy within higher education institutions (HEIs). This study provides new and in-depth insights into how norms within the internal decision-making processes of HEIs affect the freedom of academic…
Promoting Nordicness through prizes
Recent geopolitical developments have placed Nordic cooperation on the agenda. As an important institution of Nordic cooperation, the Nordic Council has historically been outperformed by the EU and NATO in matters of hard power (e.g. economic and military cooperation), and has instead prioritized influence through soft power (e.g. cultural diplomacy). The article demonstrates how the Nordic Council, through what we call regional soft power, promo…
Defensive integration through cooperative re-bordering? How member states use internal border controls in Schengen
Following the refugee crisis in 2015 and the coronavirus pandemic in 2020, the use of internal border controls within the EU expanded considerably. This change seems to be at odds with the freedom of movement within the Schengen Area, a cornerstone of European integration. Previous research has been inconclusive as to whether this re-bordering signals a move towards renationalisation and disintegration or if it should be understood as a reconfigu…
Differentiated Implementation of Controls
The use of temporary internal border controls in the Schengen Area reached a new record during the outbreak and spread of the Covid-19 pandemic. Several member states chose to introduce internal border controls that had not done so up until that point, while others have had continuous border controls in place since the refugee crisis in 2015. Other member states have never or only rarely used this temporary opt-out from the principle of free move…
Defensive integration through cooperative re-bordering? How member states use internal border controls in Schengen
Following the refugee crisis in 2015 and the coronavirus pandemic in 2020, the use of internal border controls within the EU expanded considerably. This change seems to be at odds with the freedom of movement within the Schengen Area, a cornerstone of European integration. Previous research has been inconclusive as to whether this re-bordering signals a move towards renationalisation and disintegration or if it should be understood as a reconfigu…
Differentiated Implementation of Controls
The use of temporary internal border controls in the Schengen Area reached a new record during the outbreak and spread of the Covid-19 pandemic. Several member states chose to introduce internal border controls that had not done so up until that point, while others have had continuous border controls in place since the refugee crisis in 2015. Other member states have never or only rarely used this temporary opt-out from the principle of free move…
Differentiated Implementation of Controls
The use of temporary internal border controls in the Schengen Area reached a new record during the outbreak and spread of the Covid-19 pandemic. Several member states chose to introduce internal border controls that had not done so up until that point, while others have had continuous border controls in place since the refugee crisis in 2015. Other member states have never or only rarely used this temporary opt-out from the principle of free move…
Defensive integration through cooperative re-bordering? How member states use internal border controls in Schengen
Following the refugee crisis in 2015 and the coronavirus pandemic in 2020, the use of internal border controls within the EU expanded considerably. This change seems to be at odds with the freedom of movement within the Schengen Area, a cornerstone of European integration. Previous research has been inconclusive as to whether this re-bordering signals a move towards renationalisation and disintegration or if it should be understood as a reconfigu…
Competing Ethoses in Swedish Higher Education and Research
Academic freedom is essential for higher education and research. The ethos of the academic profession and the ability to exercise it depend not only on autonomy from external influences, such as political control, but also on individual and collegial autonomy within higher education institutions (HEIs). This study provides new and in-depth insights into how norms within the internal decision-making processes of HEIs affect the freedom of academic…
Promoting Nordicness through prizes
Recent geopolitical developments have placed Nordic cooperation on the agenda. As an important institution of Nordic cooperation, the Nordic Council has historically been outperformed by the EU and NATO in matters of hard power (e.g. economic and military cooperation), and has instead prioritized influence through soft power (e.g. cultural diplomacy). The article demonstrates how the Nordic Council, through what we call regional soft power, promo…
Politics (3 works) · Economics (2 works) · European Criminal Justice and Data Protection (2 works) · European union (2 works) · European Union Policy and Governance (2 works) · Geography (2 works) · International trade (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Law (2 works) · Member states (2 works)