Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Joseph Zamadics

Biographic Data

ID4384146
NAMEJoseph Zamadics
GIVEN NAMESJoseph
FAMILY NAMEZamadics
SIGNATUREZAMADICS J
AFFILIATIONSUniversity of Colorado Boulder
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS3
TOTAL CITATIONS4
WORKS AS AUTHOR3
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2019
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2021
H-INDEX1
  • Ideological cross-pressures or random error? An analysis of spatially inconsistent voting in the US House and US Senate

    C Algara, Joseph Zamadics•ARTICLE•Journal of Legislative Studies•2021•References: 40

    Theoretical and empirical models of congressional voting assume that legislators vote with the sole purpose to move policy closer to their ideologically ideal point. While NOMINATE correctly classifies most votes cast by members of Congress, a significant number of votes are misclassified and coded as spatial error. The literature on congressional voting assumes this error to be random and idiosyncratic across members. We argue that spatial error…

  • The Member-Level Determinants and Consequences of Party Legislative Obstruction in the U.S. Senate

    Open Access•C Algara, Joseph Zamadics et al.•ARTICLE•American Politics Research•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 49

    Are Senators cross-pressured by party influence and constituent demands on procedural votes? We present a theory positing that Senators are indeed cross-pressured between these two demands and that electorally vulnerable members use the increased salience of procedural votes to differentiate themselves from their party. In an analysis of Senate procedural votes since the 92nd Congress, we develop a new spatial measure of obstruction preference an…

  • State Policy Outcomes and State Legislative Approval

    Open Access•Stefani R Langehennig, Stefani Langehennig et al.•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•2019•Cited by: 3•References: 37

    Does the public’s approval of their state legislature reflect their satisfaction with the outputs of state government? Using survey responses from the 2014 Cooperative Congressional Election Study, we consider the roots of public approval of state legislatures. We find that people are more likely to voice approval of their state legislature when it produces policy outcomes that correspond with their interests. Liberals view their state legislatur…

  • State Policy Outcomes and State Legislative Approval

    Open Access•Stefani R Langehennig, Stefani Langehennig et al.•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•2019•Cited by: 3•References: 37

    Does the public’s approval of their state legislature reflect their satisfaction with the outputs of state government? Using survey responses from the 2014 Cooperative Congressional Election Study, we consider the roots of public approval of state legislatures. We find that people are more likely to voice approval of their state legislature when it produces policy outcomes that correspond with their interests. Liberals view their state legislatur…

  • The Member-Level Determinants and Consequences of Party Legislative Obstruction in the U.S. Senate

    Open Access•C Algara, Joseph Zamadics et al.•ARTICLE•American Politics Research•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 49

    Are Senators cross-pressured by party influence and constituent demands on procedural votes? We present a theory positing that Senators are indeed cross-pressured between these two demands and that electorally vulnerable members use the increased salience of procedural votes to differentiate themselves from their party. In an analysis of Senate procedural votes since the 92nd Congress, we develop a new spatial measure of obstruction preference an…

  • The Member-Level Determinants and Consequences of Party Legislative Obstruction in the U.S. Senate

    Open Access•C Algara, Joseph Zamadics et al.•ARTICLE•American Politics Research•2019•Cited by: 1•References: 49

    Are Senators cross-pressured by party influence and constituent demands on procedural votes? We present a theory positing that Senators are indeed cross-pressured between these two demands and that electorally vulnerable members use the increased salience of procedural votes to differentiate themselves from their party. In an analysis of Senate procedural votes since the 92nd Congress, we develop a new spatial measure of obstruction preference an…

  • State Policy Outcomes and State Legislative Approval

    Open Access•Stefani R Langehennig, Stefani Langehennig et al.•ARTICLE•Political Research Quarterly•2019•Cited by: 3•References: 37

    Does the public’s approval of their state legislature reflect their satisfaction with the outputs of state government? Using survey responses from the 2014 Cooperative Congressional Election Study, we consider the roots of public approval of state legislatures. We find that people are more likely to voice approval of their state legislature when it produces policy outcomes that correspond with their interests. Liberals view their state legislatur…

  • Ideological cross-pressures or random error? An analysis of spatially inconsistent voting in the US House and US Senate

    C Algara, Joseph Zamadics•ARTICLE•Journal of Legislative Studies•2021•References: 40

    Theoretical and empirical models of congressional voting assume that legislators vote with the sole purpose to move policy closer to their ideologically ideal point. While NOMINATE correctly classifies most votes cast by members of Congress, a significant number of votes are misclassified and coded as spatial error. The literature on congressional voting assumes this error to be random and idiosyncratic across members. We argue that spatial error…

Economics (3 works) · Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Public Administration (3 works) · Law (2 works) · Legislature (2 works) · Politics (2 works) · Public Administration (2 works) · Divergence (linguistics (1 work)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae