Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Jess Sargeant

Biographic Data

ID4390600
NAMEJess Sargeant
GIVEN NAMESJess
FAMILY NAMESargeant
SIGNATURESARGEANT J
AFFILIATIONSLabour Together , London
VERIFIEDNo
TOTAL WORKS3
TOTAL CITATIONS15
AUTHOR COUNT3
EDITOR COUNT0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2018
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2024
H-INDEX1
  • The British Political Tradition and Constitutional Policy

    Open Access•Steph Coulter, Rebecca Mckee et al.•ARTICLE•Parliamentary Affairs•2024•Cited by: 1•References: 37

    The Review of the UK Constitution was an eighteen-month project assessing the functioning of the UK constitution resulting in a set of practical, innovative, and robust recommendations. This article draws out one theme from this research, the offer of Deliberative Mini Publics (DMPs) in the process of constitutional change in the UK. Using Marsh, Richards, and Smith’s ‘Asymmetric Power Model’ as a mechanism for understanding the centralised and t…

  • Information in Referendum Campaigns

    Alan Renwick, Michela Palese et al.•ARTICLE•Representation•2020•Cited by: 13•References: 56

    High-quality information is widely regarded as essential for democratic referendum campaigns, but what this means and how it can be advanced has not been systematically studied. By reviewing existing literature and drawing on a survey of practice around the democratic world, this article addresses this gap by making three contributions. First, it identifies four key dimensions to high-quality information: accuracy; balance; accessibility; and rel…

  • Discussing Brexit—Could We Do Better

    Open Access•Alan Renwick, Michela Palese et al.•ARTICLE•The Political Quarterly•2018•Cited by: 1

    It is widely recognised—by both Remainers and Leavers—that the quality of public debate in the lead‐up to the UK 's 2016 referendum on EU membership was dismal. That was partly because of the nature of the referendum itself: it was on a broad proposal rather than a specific law; the government that called it did not support the change on the ballot paper and refused to prepare for the possibility of a vote for leaving the EU . It was also influen…

  • Information in Referendum Campaigns

    Alan Renwick, Michela Palese et al.•ARTICLE•Representation•2020•Cited by: 13•References: 56

    High-quality information is widely regarded as essential for democratic referendum campaigns, but what this means and how it can be advanced has not been systematically studied. By reviewing existing literature and drawing on a survey of practice around the democratic world, this article addresses this gap by making three contributions. First, it identifies four key dimensions to high-quality information: accuracy; balance; accessibility; and rel…

  • The British Political Tradition and Constitutional Policy

    Open Access•Steph Coulter, Rebecca Mckee et al.•ARTICLE•Parliamentary Affairs•2024•Cited by: 1•References: 37

    The Review of the UK Constitution was an eighteen-month project assessing the functioning of the UK constitution resulting in a set of practical, innovative, and robust recommendations. This article draws out one theme from this research, the offer of Deliberative Mini Publics (DMPs) in the process of constitutional change in the UK. Using Marsh, Richards, and Smith’s ‘Asymmetric Power Model’ as a mechanism for understanding the centralised and t…

  • Discussing Brexit—Could We Do Better

    Open Access•Alan Renwick, Michela Palese et al.•ARTICLE•The Political Quarterly•2018•Cited by: 1

    It is widely recognised—by both Remainers and Leavers—that the quality of public debate in the lead‐up to the UK 's 2016 referendum on EU membership was dismal. That was partly because of the nature of the referendum itself: it was on a broad proposal rather than a specific law; the government that called it did not support the change on the ballot paper and refused to prepare for the possibility of a vote for leaving the EU . It was also influen…

  • Discussing Brexit—Could We Do Better

    Open Access•Alan Renwick, Michela Palese et al.•ARTICLE•The Political Quarterly•2018•Cited by: 1

    It is widely recognised—by both Remainers and Leavers—that the quality of public debate in the lead‐up to the UK 's 2016 referendum on EU membership was dismal. That was partly because of the nature of the referendum itself: it was on a broad proposal rather than a specific law; the government that called it did not support the change on the ballot paper and refused to prepare for the possibility of a vote for leaving the EU . It was also influen…

  • Information in Referendum Campaigns

    Alan Renwick, Michela Palese et al.•ARTICLE•Representation•2020•Cited by: 13•References: 56

    High-quality information is widely regarded as essential for democratic referendum campaigns, but what this means and how it can be advanced has not been systematically studied. By reviewing existing literature and drawing on a survey of practice around the democratic world, this article addresses this gap by making three contributions. First, it identifies four key dimensions to high-quality information: accuracy; balance; accessibility; and rel…

  • The British Political Tradition and Constitutional Policy

    Open Access•Steph Coulter, Rebecca Mckee et al.•ARTICLE•Parliamentary Affairs•2024•Cited by: 1•References: 37

    The Review of the UK Constitution was an eighteen-month project assessing the functioning of the UK constitution resulting in a set of practical, innovative, and robust recommendations. This article draws out one theme from this research, the offer of Deliberative Mini Publics (DMPs) in the process of constitutional change in the UK. Using Marsh, Richards, and Smith’s ‘Asymmetric Power Model’ as a mechanism for understanding the centralised and t…

Democracy (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Political science (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Computer Science (2 works) · Deliberative democracy (2 works) · Electoral Systems and Political Participation (2 works) · Law and economics (2 works) · Misinformation (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae