Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Marius Frenken

Biographic Data

ID4394593
NAMEMarius Frenken
GIVEN NAMESMarius
FAMILY NAMEFrenken
SIGNATUREFRENKEN M
AFFILIATIONSJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz
ORCID0000-0001-9418-4987
VERIFIEDYes
TOTAL WORKS7
TOTAL CITATIONS29
WORKS AS AUTHOR7
WORKS AS EDITOR0
FIRST PUBLICATION YEAR2021
LATEST PUBLICATION YEAR2026
H-INDEX2
  • Commemorating or closing? A mixed methods approach to understanding perpetrator memory in Germany

    Jakob Bläsi, Marius Frenken et al.•ARTICLE•Peace and Conflict Journal of…•2026

  • “Just Because It’s a Conspiracy Theory Doesn’t Mean They’re Not Out to Get You”

    Open Access•Marius Frenken, Annika Reusch et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychological and…•2025

    Although conspiracy theories exhibit varying degrees of plausibility as explanations for societal events, they are typically considered epistemically problematic. Since normative ascriptions of plausibility are not essential to their definition, we sought to examine whether judgments of (im)plausible conspiracy theories have different psychological underpinnings. In two preregistered studies ( N = 563), the plausibility of fictitious conspiracy t…

  • Law and order, magical spirits, and false flag operations

    Open Access•Marius Frenken, Roland Imhoff•ARTICLE•Political Psychology•2025•Cited by: 2•References: 79

    In Western democracies, commentators have noted an unprecedented diversity in protest movements opposing ecological and health regulations, including traditional right‐wing authoritarians alongside conspiracy and spiritual believers. Some of these beliefs appear to be incompatible with one another, since authoritarianism is a hallmark of (extreme) right‐wing movements, while spirituality is typically expected to be more prevalent in liberal alter…

  • On the Relation Between Religiosity and the Endorsement of Conspiracy Theories

    Open Access•Marius Frenken, M Bilewicz et al.•ARTICLE•Political Psychology•2023•Cited by: 23•References: 80

    Religious and conspiracy beliefs share the feature of assuming powerful forces that determine the fate of the world. Correspondingly, they have been theorized to address similar psychological needs and to be based on similar cognitions, but there exist little authoritative answers about their relationship. We delineate two theory‐driven possibilities. If conspiracy theories and religions serve as surrogates for each other by fulfilling similar ne…

  • Tearing apart the “evil” twins

    Open Access•Roland Imhoff, Tisa Bertlich et al.•ARTICLE•Current Opinion in Psychology•2022

  • Malevolent intentions and secret coordination. Dissecting cognitive processes in conspiracy beliefs via diffusion modeling

    Open Access•Marius Frenken, Roland Imhoff•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2022•Cited by: 4•References: 53

  • Cognitive processes behind the shooter bias

    Open Access•Marius Frenken, Wanja Hemmerich et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2021•References: 50

  • On the Relation Between Religiosity and the Endorsement of Conspiracy Theories

    Open Access•Marius Frenken, M Bilewicz et al.•ARTICLE•Political Psychology•2023•Cited by: 23•References: 80

    Religious and conspiracy beliefs share the feature of assuming powerful forces that determine the fate of the world. Correspondingly, they have been theorized to address similar psychological needs and to be based on similar cognitions, but there exist little authoritative answers about their relationship. We delineate two theory‐driven possibilities. If conspiracy theories and religions serve as surrogates for each other by fulfilling similar ne…

  • Malevolent intentions and secret coordination. Dissecting cognitive processes in conspiracy beliefs via diffusion modeling

    Open Access•Marius Frenken, Roland Imhoff•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2022•Cited by: 4•References: 53

  • Law and order, magical spirits, and false flag operations

    Open Access•Marius Frenken, Roland Imhoff•ARTICLE•Political Psychology•2025•Cited by: 2•References: 79

    In Western democracies, commentators have noted an unprecedented diversity in protest movements opposing ecological and health regulations, including traditional right‐wing authoritarians alongside conspiracy and spiritual believers. Some of these beliefs appear to be incompatible with one another, since authoritarianism is a hallmark of (extreme) right‐wing movements, while spirituality is typically expected to be more prevalent in liberal alter…

  • Cognitive processes behind the shooter bias

    Open Access•Marius Frenken, Wanja Hemmerich et al.•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2021•References: 50

  • Tearing apart the “evil” twins

    Open Access•Roland Imhoff, Tisa Bertlich et al.•ARTICLE•Current Opinion in Psychology•2022

  • Malevolent intentions and secret coordination. Dissecting cognitive processes in conspiracy beliefs via diffusion modeling

    Open Access•Marius Frenken, Roland Imhoff•ARTICLE•Journal of Experimental Social…•2022•Cited by: 4•References: 53

  • On the Relation Between Religiosity and the Endorsement of Conspiracy Theories

    Open Access•Marius Frenken, M Bilewicz et al.•ARTICLE•Political Psychology•2023•Cited by: 23•References: 80

    Religious and conspiracy beliefs share the feature of assuming powerful forces that determine the fate of the world. Correspondingly, they have been theorized to address similar psychological needs and to be based on similar cognitions, but there exist little authoritative answers about their relationship. We delineate two theory‐driven possibilities. If conspiracy theories and religions serve as surrogates for each other by fulfilling similar ne…

  • “Just Because It’s a Conspiracy Theory Doesn’t Mean They’re Not Out to Get You”

    Open Access•Marius Frenken, Annika Reusch et al.•ARTICLE•Social Psychological and…•2025

    Although conspiracy theories exhibit varying degrees of plausibility as explanations for societal events, they are typically considered epistemically problematic. Since normative ascriptions of plausibility are not essential to their definition, we sought to examine whether judgments of (im)plausible conspiracy theories have different psychological underpinnings. In two preregistered studies ( N = 563), the plausibility of fictitious conspiracy t…

  • Law and order, magical spirits, and false flag operations

    Open Access•Marius Frenken, Roland Imhoff•ARTICLE•Political Psychology•2025•Cited by: 2•References: 79

    In Western democracies, commentators have noted an unprecedented diversity in protest movements opposing ecological and health regulations, including traditional right‐wing authoritarians alongside conspiracy and spiritual believers. Some of these beliefs appear to be incompatible with one another, since authoritarianism is a hallmark of (extreme) right‐wing movements, while spirituality is typically expected to be more prevalent in liberal alter…

  • Commemorating or closing? A mixed methods approach to understanding perpetrator memory in Germany

    Jakob Bläsi, Marius Frenken et al.•ARTICLE•Peace and Conflict Journal of…•2026

Psychology (6 works) · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 works) · Social Psychology (6 works) · Misinformation and Its Impacts (4 works) · Social Psychology (4 works) · Epistemology (3 works) · Law (3 works) · Politics (3 works) · Cognition (2 works) · Cognitive psychology (2 works)

Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae